The Apache Commons Daemon team is pleased to announce the
commons-daemon-1.0.8 release!
Version 1.0.8 is both a bug fix and feature update release.
Source and binary distributions are available for download
from the Apache Commons download site:
http://commons.apache.org/daemon/download_daemon.c
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Hello,
Issues that I have reported are
* MATH-581 (Support for iterative linear solvers): there is now a
framework for this feature, as well as two solvers (conjugate
gradient, SYMMLQ). While this might be extended with other solvers as
well, it could certainly wait (and would not lead to a chan
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
> [...]
>
> >
> >> could other people add to this list the features they want to have in 3.0 ?
> >
> > I think that more important is the review of opened tickets, asking for
> > people to commit working on them... [Oops, sorry again.]
>
> Yes, this was what I meant. sorry to have used the term
On 23 November 2011 21:29, wrote:
> Author: wspeirs
> Date: Wed Nov 23 21:29:50 2011
> New Revision: 1205609
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1205609&view=rev
> Log:
> - Removed trailing spaces
> - Added final modifiers to fields in BeanMapHandler
> - Added comments for why CCE warnings
Le 23/11/2011 16:57, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> Hi Luc.
Hi Gilles,
>
>>
>> I have had several questions about release plans for 3.0.
>>
>> I feel guilty for not having pushed this version out yet.
>
> "Release early, release often ..." would alleviate this feeling.
> And would reduce the tensi
On 23 November 2011 19:52, wrote:
> Author: wspeirs
> Date: Wed Nov 23 19:52:45 2011
> New Revision: 1205551
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1205551&view=rev
> Log:
> - Added warning supression for CCE
But why is it safe to suppress the warning?
Please add a comment to each instance s
On 11/22/11 11:19 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> Hi,
> should I create a JIRA ticket to merge xxxDistribution (interface) and
> xxxDistributionImpl?
+1
Phil
> Best,
> Sébastien
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@common
On 11/23/11 2:05 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 23/11/2011 09:16, Mikkel Meyer Andersen a écrit :
>> I also think it is a good idea, but with the addition of thinking
>> parallelisation into the framework (e.g. in the map functionality).
>> Whether it should be done in a branch or not, I don't know,
On 23 November 2011 17:45, Bill Speirs wrote:
> These are good questions/points...
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:35 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> > +
>> > + /**
>> > + * The Class of beans produced by this handler.
>> > + */
>> > + private Class type;
>> > +
>> > + /**
>> > + * The R
Sebastian,
Could you push the maven artifacts?
The one we voted are in the
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/daemon-1.0.8/.deploy/
On 11/23/2011 12:32 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
With my implicit +1 we have
+1 Simone, Phil, Luc, Jörg, Gary, James, Mladen
-1 Sebastian
Commons daemon 1.0.8 has been vo
These are good questions/points...
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:35 PM, sebb wrote:
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * The Class of beans produced by this handler.
> > + */
> > +private Class type;
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * The RowProcessor implementation to use when converting rows into
>
On 23 November 2011 17:06, wrote:
> Author: wspeirs
> Date: Wed Nov 23 17:06:27 2011
> New Revision: 1205492
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1205492&view=rev
> Log:
> - Added generics to a few handlers: patch from DBUTILS-66
The change also generates "Unchecked cast" warnings.
If the
On 23 November 2011 16:31, wrote:
> Author: wspeirs
> Date: Wed Nov 23 16:31:09 2011
> New Revision: 1205485
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1205485&view=rev
> Log:
> - Added BeanMapHandler and associated test case (DBUTILS-67)
> - Updated pom.xml; moved myself from contrib to dev
> - U
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 4:18 AM, Matthew Pocock
wrote:
> Hi Henri,
>
>
> On 23 November 2011 07:14, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> I get the following when I 'mvn clean package':
>>
>>
>> testSpeedCheck(org.apache.commons.codec.language.bm.BeiderMorseEncoderTest):
>> Java heap space
>>
>> My MAVEN_OP
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 02:17:24PM +, sebb wrote:
> On 23 November 2011 13:41, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > As a [math] outsider and curious watcher of the [math] "sub-ML" I can offer
> > the XP mantra: release early, release often. It will never be perfect ;)
I totally agree with this (which was
Hi Luc.
>
> I have had several questions about release plans for 3.0.
>
> I feel guilty for not having pushed this version out yet.
"Release early, release often ..." would alleviate this feeling.
And would reduce the tensions here because much less *new* things would be
under discussion betwee
On 23 November 2011 13:41, Gary Gregory wrote:
> As a [math] outsider and curious watcher of the [math] "sub-ML" I can offer
> the XP mantra: release early, release often. It will never be perfect ;)
I think this is a dangerous mantra for Commons, which strives for
extreme compatibility (to coin
Vote canceled for the issue raised by Sebb below.
Gary
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 8:34 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 20 November 2011 18:25, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Good day to you all:
> >
> > I have prepared Commons Codec 1.6-RC2.
> >
> > The changes from RC1 are what Sebb found:
> > - EOL in sources
>
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 8:34 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 20 November 2011 18:25, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Good day to you all:
> >
> > I have prepared Commons Codec 1.6-RC2.
> >
> > The changes from RC1 are what Sebb found:
> > - EOL in sources
> > - Cruft from a dirty build, so I built this RC as I sho
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 07:19:36AM +0100, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> Hi,
> should I create a JIRA ticket to merge xxxDistribution (interface) and
> xxxDistributionImpl?
+1
Gilles
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@common
As a [math] outsider and curious watcher of the [math] "sub-ML" I can offer
the XP mantra: release early, release often. It will never be perfect ;)
Take care of API breaking changes, release 3, tweak features for 3.1 and so
on.
2c,
Gary
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 4:19 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> He
On 20 November 2011 18:25, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Good day to you all:
>
> I have prepared Commons Codec 1.6-RC2.
>
> The changes from RC1 are what Sebb found:
> - EOL in sources
> - Cruft from a dirty build, so I built this RC as I should have the first
> time around with:
> - mvn clean
> -
Hi,
as for me, I can only think of new features... probably not the best
time... I'll just name them for the record, to see if people would be
interested
- allow for higher-order Legendre-Gauss integration schemes, and indeed
other Gauss-based integration schemes,
- widen the panel of special f
Hi.
> > I also think it is a good idea, but with the addition of thinking
> > parallelisation into the framework (e.g. in the map functionality).
> > Whether it should be done in a branch or not, I don't know, but I guess
> > the people who do know will reply on that :-).
>
> I would very much li
> I would very much like to have a simplified API.
>
> I also would vevery very much like to see 3.0 released, so if we are
> gonna doing some API change here, we should really go forward and do it
> fast. I'll start another thread about this.
>
> Luc
>
you're right, Luc, sorry for that. I'll answe
Just adding a data point: Because of other Maven build I have to do, I
always ause:
MAVEN_OPTS=-XX:MaxPermSize=500m -Xmx2000m
Gary
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:14 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> I get the following when I 'mvn clean package':
>
>
> testSpeedCheck(org.apache.commons.codec.language.bm.
Hi Hen,
Henri Yandell wrote:
> I get the following when I 'mvn clean package':
>
>
testSpeedCheck(org.apache.commons.codec.language.bm.BeiderMorseEncoderTest):
> Java heap space
>
> My MAVEN_OPTS are:
>
> -Xmx2048m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m
>
> Not sure if that's expected (2G felt big enough)
Hi all guys,
our ASF fellow Kristian Rosenvold fixed the EXEC-34 issue while adding
it in Maven, I'm not deep inside [exec] but I aplied locally the patch
and looks working.
Any objection I commit it?
Many thanks in advance!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejo
Hi Henri,
On 23 November 2011 07:14, Henri Yandell wrote:
> I get the following when I 'mvn clean package':
>
>
> testSpeedCheck(org.apache.commons.codec.language.bm.BeiderMorseEncoderTest):
> Java heap space
>
> My MAVEN_OPTS are:
>
> -Xmx2048m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m
>
> Not sure if that's exp
With my implicit +1 we have
+1 Simone, Phil, Luc, Jörg, Gary, James, Mladen
-1 Sebastian
Commons daemon 1.0.8 has been voted by majority of votes.
I'll proceed with copying files to dist and create ANN
when the mirrors pick up.
The proposed Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.8 release
is now available
Hello,
I have had several questions about release plans for 3.0.
I feel guilty for not having pushed this version out yet. It is not in
release shape now and many thing are still ongoing. Typically, a new
thread as been started a few hours ago about an important change in the
linear algebra API (
Le 23/11/2011 09:16, Mikkel Meyer Andersen a écrit :
> I also think it is a good idea, but with the addition of thinking
> parallelisation into the framework (e.g. in the map functionality).
> Whether it should be done in a branch or not, I don't know, but I guess
> the people who do know will repl
I also think it is a good idea, but with the addition of thinking
parallelisation into the framework (e.g. in the map functionality).
Whether it should be done in a branch or not, I don't know, but I guess
the people who do know will reply on that :-).
Cheers, Mikkel.
2011/11/23 Ted Dunning :
> I
I still think it is a good idea.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 22, 2011, at 23:27, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> Hello,
> I would like to revive a discussion which took place a few months ago,
> about the design of the matrix and vector classes. As far as I remember,
> what came out was that these c
36 matches
Mail list logo