To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-vfs2-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
Hi Jorge,
The patch I see here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@commons.apache.org/msg26521.html
does not apply due to formatting in the email (line lengths I think).
Can you send me (ggregory at apache dor org) the patch (based on HEAD of
trunk) or post a file somewhere?
Thank you,
Gary
On S
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
Am 12.11.2011 00:10, schrieb Henri Yandell:
+1.
Issue found appears related to the 22 parent. Not a blocker for
general users (and easy to work around if hit).
Hen
As I said, I did not find any problems with the RC.
So +1 from me, too.
Oliver
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Henri Yandell
I won't be able to look at this until tonight or tomorrow EST.
Gary
On Nov 12, 2011, at 7:08, "Jörg Schaible" wrote:
> Ping, Gary?
>
> Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
>> Hi Gary,
>>
>> Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>>> For now, I've @Ignore'd
>>> ReflectionToStringBuilderConcurrencyTest.testCopyOnWriteArrayLis
Ping, Gary?
Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> For now, I've @Ignore'd
>> ReflectionToStringBuilderConcurrencyTest.testCopyOnWriteArrayList()
>>
>> FYI: If I reduce the DATA_SIZE from 10 to 1 the test
>> ReflectionToStringBuilderConcurrencyTest.testLinkedList(
On 12 November 2011 06:23, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Looks good, though I'm not sure the redirect on the mirror adds you
> much value. I'd do it if it's standard practice, otherwise skip.
Seems to be standard practice, and it's trivial to do.
It also catches any references to the old location, in ca