To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-vfs2-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
Le 07/11/2011 22:38, Luc Maisonobe a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> Gilles has started adding an API for simple bounds constraints in
> optimization, which will soo be available for both Bobyqa and CMA-ES, as
> both method naturally support such constraints.
>
> I wondered if we could take the opportunity
Hi all,
Gilles has started adding an API for simple bounds constraints in
optimization, which will soo be available for both Bobyqa and CMA-ES, as
both method naturally support such constraints.
I wondered if we could take the opportunity to set up a poor man
implementation in the abstract base c
Will have a look when Gilles finished the change next week.
Dietmar
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Gilles Sadowski [mailto:gil...@harfang.homelinux.org]
Gesendet: Montag, 7. November 2011 15:22
An: dev@commons.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [math] CMA-ES input sigma
> [...]
> >
> > P.S. Pleas
Hi all,
I've hit another problem with CMA-ES. I did not see any user setting for
convergence. CMA-ES uses only the no arguments constructor of its base
class, which is BaseAbstractScalarOptimizer. This implies the
convergence checker is set to SimpleScalarValueChecker with default values.
I would
> [...]
> >
> > P.S. Please don't forget that the "CMAESOptimizer" is not yet upgraded to
> > use the new "optimize" API (for simple bounds); I intended to change
> > that by next week.
>
> Ah, thanks. This explain some strange behaviour I get. I will let you
> adapt this, for now I wil
Le 07/11/2011 14:42, Luc Maisonobe a écrit :
> Le 07/11/2011 14:24, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
>> Hi Luc.
>>
>>> I am trying to use CMA-ES optimizer with simple boundaries.
>>> It seems the inputSigma parameter should be normalized as it is checked
>>> against the [0; 1] range in the checkParameters
Le 07/11/2011 14:24, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> Hi Luc.
>
>> I am trying to use CMA-ES optimizer with simple boundaries.
>> It seems the inputSigma parameter should be normalized as it is checked
>> against the [0; 1] range in the checkParameters private method and as
>> its value defaults to 0.3
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=14221&projectId=129
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Mon 7 Nov 2011 13:31:56 +
Finished at: Mon 7 Nov 2011 13:34:45 +
Total time: 2m 49s
Build Trigger: Schedule
B
Hi Luc.
> I am trying to use CMA-ES optimizer with simple boundaries.
> It seems the inputSigma parameter should be normalized as it is checked
> against the [0; 1] range in the checkParameters private method and as
> its value defaults to 0.3 if not not set in the initializeCMA private
> method.
I had exactly this problem (where it wasn't obvious that the sigma parameter
needed to be normalized to [0-1]), a few days ago. I think your second
solution is the more user friendly.
Bruce
On Nov 7, 2011, at 7:58 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to use CMA-ES optimizer with
Hello,
I am trying to use CMA-ES optimizer with simple boundaries.
It seems the inputSigma parameter should be normalized as it is checked
against the [0; 1] range in the checkParameters private method and as
its value defaults to 0.3 if not not set in the initializeCMA private
method.
I would ha
ah, I see - didn't read the content, but just the subject. It gives
you anyway more work...
thanks for taking care,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Mauriz
Every commits have a different message, I thought that this would have
made the peer revision process easier (though it is a big pain in the
..., expecially for the mailboxes :D) .
Furthermore, a detailed message should avoid conditions like this
http://markmail.org/message/vvkvkochvjeit3g7 :)
Hola Mau,
can I ask you why you commit patches step-by-step? Just a matter of curiosity :)
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:49 AM, wrote:
> Author: mcucchiara
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
