To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-flatfile has an issue affecting its community integration.
This is
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jexl has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:22 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> This is a multiproject site. "mvn site" runs the site command in each
> subproject. There are 0 tests in the root project because there is no code
> there. After the "mvn site" completes cd to the subdirectory and look at
> the site directory t
You're welcome, you're welcome, you're welcome ;)
There are, sadly, still plenty (229) checkstyle errors. Only 3 FindBugs
issues though.
Gary
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:49 PM, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com <
ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> Thank you, thank you, thank you! You probably just c
Thank you, thank you, thank you! You probably just cleared up most of the
remaining checkstyle errors. I've looked at that code a few times and just
completely gave up trying to understand it.
Ralph
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Gary D. Gregory (Resolved) (JIRA) <
j...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
Agreed too, caught the typo too; done in SVN.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:56 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 2 November 2011 14:55, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> > Hi Gary!
> > for this kind of modification, I'd suggest 'update' rather than 'fix'
> > in the type attribute... WDYT?
>
> Agreed.
>
> > HTH, all the b
On 2 November 2011 14:55, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Gary!
> for this kind of modification, I'd suggest 'update' rather than 'fix'
> in the type attribute... WDYT?
Agreed.
> HTH, all the best!
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://tw
Hi Gary!
for this kind of modification, I'd suggest 'update' rather than 'fix'
in the type attribute... WDYT?
HTH, all the best!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 3:4
Wow. It works for me now too.
Cheers
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara
wrote:
> Both work for me
>
> Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara
> G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921
> Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara
>
> Maur
Both work for me
Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara
G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921
Linkedin:http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara
Maurizio Cucchiara
On 2 November 2011 12:07, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> I cannot see the release on the webpa
Cool! Thanks Stefan for pushing it!
I cannot see the release on the webpage (and the download cgi is not
avail at the moment). Is it due to synchronization?
Cheers
Christian
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 5:53 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> The Apache Commons Compress team is pleased to announce the
> com
On 2 November 2011 06:11, Mladen Truk wrote:
> Don't know what would that give, but if you have an itch ... +1
Makes it a bit easier if all Commons components have similar layout;
simplifies pom.xml slightly if defaults are used.
It's nothing major, but it all helps.
> On 11/02/2011 12:58 AM, s
I see your point, Phil, and agree with you. Thanks for clarifying.
Cheers, Mikkel.
Den 01/11/2011 18.24 skrev "Phil Steitz" :
> On 11/1/11 1:05 AM, Mikkel Meyer Andersen wrote:
> > 2011/10/30 Phil Steitz :
> >> On 10/29/11 10:20 AM, cwinter wrote:
> >>> Phil Steitz wrote:
> I would say pull
>
> What exactly do we gain by having the common parent? The inverse
> cdf machinery will work only for the continuous (by that, I mean
> real-valued RV) case. Note how it is overriden now in
> AbstractIntegerDistribution. So why not just leave that alone and
> separate out the discrete/integer/
15 matches
Mail list logo
