On 10/29/11 10:24 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 10/8/11 2:24 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>
>> Phil Steitz a écrit :
>>
>>> I am getting RTE with message above when I try to run the example
>>> under "updating the base and differentiated objects" in the docs.
>>> Is this example supposed to work with
On 10/8/11 2:24 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>
>
> Phil Steitz a écrit :
>
>> I am getting RTE with message above when I try to run the example
>> under "updating the base and differentiated objects" in the docs.
>> Is this example supposed to work with the code in trunk? Also, I am
> I'll look at t
On 10/29/11 10:20 AM, cwinter wrote:
> Phil Steitz wrote:
>> I would say pull DiscreteDistribution out. That is where the
>> difference really lies. I have thought about suggesting that we
>> eliminate it altogether; but I still think there may be value in
>> supporting discrete distributions ove
this *is* cool :)
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara
wrote:
> Hi Simo,
>
> there is a checkstyle rule, take a look at http://goo.gl/uU2Cu and
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
Adrian,
you are right OGNL code seems so old-fashion :)
Your help will be (and still now is) appreciated
Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara
G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921
Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara
Maurizio Cucchiara
On
Hi Simo,
there is a checkstyle rule, take a look at http://goo.gl/uU2Cu and
http://goo.gl/1zd1v
Have a nice WE you too.
Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara
G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921
Linkedin :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara
Maurizio Cu
> There's quite a
> bit of that "retro" feel hanging around the OGNL code, I'll be joining
> Maurizio to help freshen that up a little in the coming days.
Sure, just to cite myself:
> Anyway I like it, variables prefixed with '_' look so '90 to me :)
anyway I'm not just sure how it is related to
I really wish that I wasn't old enough to remember the days of 1-3 character
variable names and C++ style '_' variable name prefixing! There's quite a
bit of that "retro" feel hanging around the OGNL code, I'll be joining
Maurizio to help freshen that up a little in the coming days.
Cheers, Adria
Hola,
sorry but I don't understand which is the relation between renaming
fields and checkstyle rules.
Was there a rule that check '_' prefix in the fields name? IIUC, there wasn't.
Have a nice WE!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.c
Hi Simo,
fields renaming was what I did in order to fix the change styles issue
(otherwise I would have never changed the field name).
I though it seems reasonable looking the other commit messages (see
http://goo.gl/TThpd).
Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara
G+ :https://plu
Phil Steitz wrote:
>
> I would say pull DiscreteDistribution out. That is where the
> difference really lies. I have thought about suggesting that we
> eliminate it altogether; but I still think there may be value in
> supporting discrete distributions over sample spaces that are not
> embedded
On 10/29/11 9:07 AM, cwinter wrote:
> cwinter wrote:
>> [...] Regarding IntergerDistribution I don't have a preference on leaving
>> it in the current hierarchy or making it to a new root.
>>
>> Christian
>>
> Just now, while pulling inverseCumulativeProbability form
> ContinuousDistribution up to
cwinter wrote:
>
> [...] Regarding IntergerDistribution I don't have a preference on leaving
> it in the current hierarchy or making it to a new root.
>
> Christian
>
Just now, while pulling inverseCumulativeProbability form
ContinuousDistribution up to Distribution, I got a conflict with
Inte
Hi Gary,
I'm assuming you was talking about subversion connection (release, tag,
etc.)
I encountered same trouble during the site update (AFIAK there is no other
protocol to update the website)
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/parent-wagon-protocols-mvn
On 10/29/11 7:16 AM, cwinter wrote:
> Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 10/28/11 9:31 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> The following question might sound stupid, but occured to me while
>>> thinking about MATH-692. So here goes. What was initially meant by
>>> "Continuous Distribution" (as in Abstra
Phil Steitz wrote:
>
> On 10/28/11 9:31 PM, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
>> Hi,
>> The following question might sound stupid, but occured to me while
>> thinking about MATH-692. So here goes. What was initially meant by
>> "Continuous Distribution" (as in AbstractContinuousDistribution) ?
>> My view
Le 29/10/2011 12:55, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 09:10:12AM +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Le 28/10/2011 23:30, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> I think that something is not quite right in those class names:
>>> UnivariateMatrixFunction
>>> UnivariateRealFun
Hola Mau
that's a fields renaming more than checkstyle issues, just to properly
record changes.
Anyway I like it, variables prefixed with '_' look so '90 to me :)
Thanks for taking care!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetr
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:31:30AM +, Continuum@vmbuild wrote:
> Online report :
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=13852&projectId=97
>
> Build statistics:
> State: Failed
> Previous State: Ok
> Started at: Sat 29 Oct 2011 00:29:22 +
> Finished at: S
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 09:10:12AM +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 28/10/2011 23:30, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> > Hello.
> >
> > I think that something is not quite right in those class names:
> > UnivariateMatrixFunction
> > UnivariateRealFunction
> > UnivariateVectorialFunction
> >
> >
The Apache Commons community is pleased to announce the Apache Commons
Digester 3.1 release!
The Apache Commons Digester package lets you configure an XML to Java
object mapping module which triggers certain actions called rules
whenever a particular pattern of nested XML elements is recognized.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
Le 28/10/2011 23:30, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> Hello.
>
> I think that something is not quite right in those class names:
> UnivariateMatrixFunction
> UnivariateRealFunction
> UnivariateVectorialFunction
>
> To be consistent, we should either
> 1. indicate the "grouping" and "number" typ
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
26 matches
Mail list logo
