Re: svn commit: r1187627 [1/2] - in /commons/proper/ognl/performance-analysis/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/ognl/performance/invocation/ main/java/org/apache/commons/ognl/performance/objects/ main

2011-10-22 Thread sebb
On 22 October 2011 02:28, wrote: > Author: mcucchiara > Date: Sat Oct 22 01:28:28 2011 > New Revision: 1187627 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1187627&view=rev > Log: > Added svn keywords property $Date$ causes problems when comparing SVN tags with source archives. That is because $Dat

Re: [OGNL] Performance analysis

2011-10-22 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
This is the result of the performance comparison: Apache Commons OGNL http://s.apache.org/H1u Legacy OGNL implementation http://s.apache.org/ih There is a huge difference. Furthermore, looks like I need to refine declarative method cache. Twitter     :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara G+        

Re: [OGNL] Performance analysis

2011-10-22 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
For the record, starting from now, OGNL Runtime has a new setCacheFactory method which allows the user to choose his preferred implementation. Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 Linkedin:http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriz

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons-Digester 3.1 based on RC1

2011-10-22 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 21.10.2011 23:19, schrieb Simone Tripodi: Forgot to mention about checkstyle: no idea. If you built the Digester using the provided pom, there shouldn't be ambiguity... any hint? Being no maven guru, I haven't got a clue either. I also would expect that the pom contains sufficient informati

Re: svn commit: r1187657 - in /commons/proper/math/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/math/linear/SymmLQ.java test/java/org/apache/commons/math/linear/SymmLQTest.java

2011-10-22 Thread Sébastien Brisard
> > As I don't see the "with props" marker in the above message, I think the > svn properties for end of line and keyword substitutions are missing. > Could you check if it is the case ? > > Note that you can configure your subversion client to add these > properties automatically when you commit a

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-10-22 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: svn commit: r1187657 - in /commons/proper/math/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/math/linear/SymmLQ.java test/java/org/apache/commons/math/linear/SymmLQTest.java

2011-10-22 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 22/10/2011 08:36, celes...@apache.org a écrit : > Author: celestin Hi Sébastien, > Date: Sat Oct 22 06:36:31 2011 > New Revision: 1187657 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1187657&view=rev > Log: > Implementation of the SYMMLQ iterative linear solver, based on Pr. Saunders > FORTRAN

Re: [math] SymmLQ

2011-10-22 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 22/10/2011 08:41, Sébastien Brisard a écrit : > Hello, Hi Sébastien, > I'm happy to announce that the Java port of the FORTRAN SymmLQ solver > is now ready for you all to review. I've tried to add as many > implementation comments as possible, since the way the iterations are > handled is not

Re: [OGNL] Performance analysis

2011-10-22 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
Apropos the idea of the maven profile is very good. +1 and thank you. Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 Linkedin:http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara Maurizio Cucchiara On 22 October 2011 12:24, Maurizio Cucchi

Re: [OGNL] Performance analysis

2011-10-22 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
Sure you can, before that I should merge new branch with the current trunk. Further, FYI I have just submitted a patch for a small improvement http://issues.carrot2.org/browse/JUNITBENCH-40 Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 L

Re: [OGNL] Performance analysis

2011-10-22 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Mau, that for the explanation, that really helps on clarifying the graph!!! I have an idea about merging the tests in trunk with a profile approach that I already submitted for the Disruptor project[1] - they have performance/benchmark tests too - if it is fine for you I can work on it - not t

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-exec-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-10-22 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

Re: [OGNL] Performance analysis

2011-10-22 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
I almost forgot there are even old vs commons comparison. Stay tuned :) Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 Linkedin:http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara Maurizio Cucchiara On 22 October 2011 09:58, Maurizio Cuc

Re: [OGNL] Performance analysis

2011-10-22 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
Thank you Simo, Ok, I realized after that the graph needs at least a short explanation: In that test I have tried to test every caches which I re-engineered. In the graph you mentioned, there are depicted 3 different kind of cache implementations: 1. Concurrent HashMap (CHM) 2. Thread-safe HashMap

Re: [OGNL] Performance analysis

2011-10-22 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Mau, sorry for the silly question - I'm not familiar with JUnit benchmark - : is there any reason why performance tests have to be separated from the rest of the project? Can we think about merging them in the core once reached the general/lazy consensus? TIA, have a nice WE! Simo http://people