Re: [configuration] Java 5 target for the next release?

2011-10-18 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 18.10.2011 16:58, schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: Hi all, What's the feeling about targeting Java 5 for Commons Configuration 1.8 ? No major refactoring, just small and compatible changes. +1 I had similar plans. Maybe this also helps for the design of version 2.0. When we have two APIs compatibl

Re: [compress] Test files for ZIP64 added

2011-10-18 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 18/10/2011 17:45, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : Writing 5GB of data simply takes time. It's time to add this dependency to the project: com.intel ssd 720 test ;) Emmanuel Bourg - To unsubscri

Re: [configuration] Java 5 target for the next release?

2011-10-18 Thread ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
I am definitely in favor of this. I've been getting complaints that some of the synchronization I put in causes bottlenecks. I would love to convert those to read/write locks to fix that. Ralph On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Hi all, > > What's the feeling about target

Re: [compress] Move to commons-parent 22?

2011-10-18 Thread sebb
On 18 October 2011 17:13, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to get a clean RAT report which means excluding some of the > test resources as RAT doesn't recognize ARs and CPIOs as binaries.  The > RAT version used by parent version 20 doesn't support excludes, RAT 0.7 > used by parent 22

[compress] Move to commons-parent 22?

2011-10-18 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi all, I'd like to get a clean RAT report which means excluding some of the test resources as RAT doesn't recognize ARs and CPIOs as binaries. The RAT version used by parent version 20 doesn't support excludes, RAT 0.7 used by parent 22 does. I've modified the POM locally, ran the tests and bui

[compress] Test files for ZIP64 added

2011-10-18 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi all, I've added a tar.bz2 holding the eleven zips needed to run all tests in Zip64SupportIT to svn trunk and use the antrun plugin to trigger Ant's untar task to extract them before running the tests. The may be better ways to do it. I thought the depedency plugin might be able to help but co

Re: [configuration] Java 5 target for the next release?

2011-10-18 Thread Simone Tripodi
Salut Manu, I think it sounds fine, in the past some components like Digester jumped directly to a major release, some others like Discovery just increased the minor version. I think that just small and compatible changes are enough to justify a minor release. All the best, Simo PS feel free to pi

[configuration] Java 5 target for the next release?

2011-10-18 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi all, What's the feeling about targeting Java 5 for Commons Configuration 1.8 ? No major refactoring, just small and compatible changes. Emmanuel Bourg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additi

[Math] Re: Nightly snapshots

2011-10-18 Thread Gilles Sadowski
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 07:54:13PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > The infra team has unlocked the deployment of snapshots for the > components with a commons-* groupId, and Continuum is properly > configured to be able to deploy the snapshots automatically if we > desire so. Is a nightly snapshot

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-10-18 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-exec-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-10-18 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This i