2 * +1
--
Olivier
Le 17 oct. 2011 07:56, "Łukasz Lenart" a
écrit :
> +1 for removing @author tag
> +1 for removing $Id$ from header
>
>
> Regards
> --
> Łukasz
> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
> Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
>
> 2011/10/15 Christian Grobmei
+1 for removing @author tag
+1 for removing $Id$ from header
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
2011/10/15 Christian Grobmeier :
> Again, the old discussion.
>
> OGNL has @author tags. I do not like them. Who wan
Hi
The docs are not correct. I'll update them.
You can either use an id that matches a developer/id in the POM, or the name
of the developer. In the first case a link to that developer at the
team-page is created.
On Sunday, October 16, 2011, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Sorry:
>
http://maven.a
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 10:01 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 16 October 2011 20:15, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> I was not aware that the name also had to be included in the developer
> section; I guess that may be used to add some cross-linking.
>
> Perhaps do some experiments with the two styles and see
On 16 October 2011 20:15, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Sorry:
> http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-changes-plugin/changes.html#class_action
> "This MUST be the name of the developer as described in the developers
> section of the pom.xml file."
>
> Is it really the id of the pom.xml? I understo
On 16 October 2011 20:11, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 10/16/11 12:02 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 16 October 2011 17:30, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 16, 2011, at 8:19 AM, Christian Grobmeier
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Adrian Cumiskey
wrote:
> Personally I
Hi Christian!
take a look at digester changes page[1], if you put the committer id,
the report automatically creates a link to the team list page,
anchoring to the committer :)
HTH!
Simo
[1] http://commons.apache.org/digester/changes-report.html
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://sim
Sorry:
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-changes-plugin/changes.html#class_action
"This MUST be the name of the developer as described in the developers
section of the pom.xml file."
Is it really the id of the pom.xml? I understood it so as it would be the name?
No preference, just want to kn
On 10/16/11 12:02 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 16 October 2011 17:30, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Oct 16, 2011, at 8:19 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Adrian Cumiskey
>>> wrote:
Personally I would favour maintaining Ant over Maven any day of the week,
On 16 October 2011 17:30, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Oct 16, 2011, at 8:19 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Adrian Cumiskey
>> wrote:
>>> Personally I would favour maintaining Ant over Maven any day of the week,
>>> although Maven IDE support is generall
Le 16/10/2011 18:10, Phil Steitz a écrit :
On 10/16/11 8:01 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 16/10/2011 09:24, Phil Steitz a écrit :
On 10/9/11 7:46 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 10/9/11 5:39 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi Phil,
Le 08/10/2011 23:42, Phil Steitz a écrit :
On 10/8/11 2:24 PM, Luc Maisono
On Oct 16, 2011, at 8:19 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Adrian Cumiskey
> wrote:
>> Personally I would favour maintaining Ant over Maven any day of the week,
>> although Maven IDE support is generally pretty good I find it so verbose and
>> unwieldy. Thi
On 10/16/11 8:01 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 16/10/2011 09:24, Phil Steitz a écrit :
>> On 10/9/11 7:46 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 10/9/11 5:39 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi Phil,
Le 08/10/2011 23:42, Phil Steitz a écrit :
> On 10/8/11 2:24 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>
I myself only came to buildr recently as I had a requirement to compile
multiple JVM languages on one project. It doesn't seem to be widely used or
adopted as yet, but having used it, it would be the first build tool I would
try to reach for on any new project.
Cheers, Adrian.
On Oct 16, 2011
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Adrian Cumiskey
wrote:
> Personally I would favour maintaining Ant over Maven any day of the week,
> although Maven IDE support is generally pretty good I find it so verbose and
> unwieldy. This is probably not within scope of cutting a RC, but I'd
> recommend
Le 16/10/2011 09:24, Phil Steitz a écrit :
On 10/9/11 7:46 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 10/9/11 5:39 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Hi Phil,
Le 08/10/2011 23:42, Phil Steitz a écrit :
On 10/8/11 2:24 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Phil Steitz a écrit :
I am getting RTE with message above when I try to
Personally I would favour maintaining Ant over Maven any day of the week,
although Maven IDE support is generally pretty good I find it so verbose and
unwieldy. This is probably not within scope of cutting a RC, but I'd recommend
buildr, its so lightweight, low maintenance and extensible, and a
On 16 October 2011 12:31, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> it is now protected[1] but Clirr still complains...
>
> [1] $ svn annotate
> src/main/java/org/apache/commons/dbutils/AbstractQueryRunner.java
> ...
> 1184792 simonetripodi protected final DataSource ds;
> ...
Not sure why that is.
Looks like
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
it is now protected[1] but Clirr still complains...
[1] $ svn annotate
src/main/java/org/apache/commons/dbutils/AbstractQueryRunner.java
...
1184792 simonetripodi protected final DataSource ds;
...
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.c
On 16 October 2011 11:53, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> while fixing the violations emerged in last DbUtils RC, I noticed that
> the bigger part of QueryRunner code has been moved to
> AbstractQueryRunner and Clirr now complains that the 'ds' field in
> QueryRunner disappeared[1], but it
Hi all guys,
while fixing the violations emerged in last DbUtils RC, I noticed that
the bigger part of QueryRunner code has been moved to
AbstractQueryRunner and Clirr now complains that the 'ds' field in
QueryRunner disappeared[1], but it would be available anyway!
Is that acceptable in order to s
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
On 10/9/11 7:46 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 10/9/11 5:39 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Hi Phil,
>>
>> Le 08/10/2011 23:42, Phil Steitz a écrit :
>>> On 10/8/11 2:24 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Phil Steitz a écrit :
> I am getting RTE with message above when I try to run the example
>
24 matches
Mail list logo
