On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> looks like last good build.xml commit was done by Niall in the far
> 2008 - since [functor] joined the proper recently and I'd like to cut
> a RC soon, I propose to drop ant support.
+1
> What are plans for ant builds maintenance? Does it
Hello.
> > [...]
>
> >> > I don't think that CM development should be focused on performance
> >> > improvements that are so sensitive to the actual hardware (if it's indeed
> >> > the varying amount of CPU cache that is responsible for this
> >> > discrepancy).
> >> >
> >> That would apparently
Hi all guys,
looks like last good build.xml commit was done by Niall in the far
2008 - since [functor] joined the proper recently and I'd like to cut
a RC soon, I propose to drop ant support.
What are plans for ant builds maintenance? Does it make sense maintain
ant builds for already released comp
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
2011/10/15 Gilles Sadowski :
> Hi.
>
>> first of all, I was the author of this very usefull statement on
>> factories... Very constructive indeed.
>
> Liking something or not is an impression that could well be justified
> afterwards. It also pushes to look for arguments that ascertain the
> feelin
On 10 October 2011 09:42, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hello,
> Looks nice ! I'd like to use for some other projects.
>
> I like too the idea about having this skin in the maven skins.
>
> @Simone: feel free to commit in maven sandbox if you want. It's open
> for all asf committers ( I have just created
Hi Niall,
thanks for your feedback! we are currently developing a more general
skin under maven sandbox[1] - where access is open to every committer
- everybody here at commons is invited to participate on maven dev@
ML.
If you want to see a live demo, the Apache DIrectMemory site[2] is
built using
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> we already discussed in the past that we would like to have a nice new
> style for the site, and I would like to take advantage from a
> discussion born in the incubator ML[1] to renew the discussion,
> because our commons-fell
On 15 October 2011 16:27, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Am 15.10.2011 16:03, schrieb Gary Gregory:
>>
>> Can checkstyle be set up to check for author tags?
>
> Yes, it can. In [configuration] there is the following setup:
>
>
>
>
>
> This means that the @author tag must be pres
On 10/15/11 8:46 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 10/15/11 5:41 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>>> first of all, I was the author of this very usefull statement on
>>> factories... Very constructive indeed.
>> Liking something or not is an impression that could well be justified
>> afterwards. It
On 10/15/11 5:41 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hi.
>
>> first of all, I was the author of this very usefull statement on
>> factories... Very constructive indeed.
> Liking something or not is an impression that could well be justified
> afterwards. It also pushes to look for arguments that ascertain
Am 15.10.2011 16:03, schrieb Gary Gregory:
Can checkstyle be set up to check for author tags?
Yes, it can. In [configuration] there is the following setup:
This means that the @author tag must be present with an arbitrary value.
The value can even be matched ag
Can checkstyle be set up to check for author tags?
Gary
On Oct 15, 2011, at 9:53, sebb wrote:
> On 15 October 2011 14:06, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> There was an ASF guideline or suggestion a couple of years ago to use
>> "Apache Software Foundation" in author tags.
>
> Not that I remember.
>
> Th
On 15 October 2011 14:06, Gary Gregory wrote:
> There was an ASF guideline or suggestion a couple of years ago to use
> "Apache Software Foundation" in author tags.
Not that I remember.
The board recommendation [1] was to not use @author tags at all.
[1]
http://www.apache.org/foundation/record
There was an ASF guideline or suggestion a couple of years ago to use
"Apache Software Foundation" in author tags.
Gary
On Oct 15, 2011, at 8:17, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> -0 on the @author tag since I'm not involved in OGNL.
>
> I find it a bit rude to remove the signature from someone else work
On 10/15/2011 1:37 PM, sebb wrote:
On 15 October 2011 13:16, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
-0 on the @author tag since I'm not involved in OGNL.
I find it a bit rude to remove the signature from someone else work. But
feel free to remove your own name.
Indeed, one should ideally get permission to rem
Hi.
> first of all, I was the author of this very usefull statement on
> factories... Very constructive indeed.
Liking something or not is an impression that could well be justified
afterwards. It also pushes to look for arguments that ascertain the
feeling. ;-)
> >
> > However it also shows th
On 15 October 2011 13:16, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> -0 on the @author tag since I'm not involved in OGNL.
>
> I find it a bit rude to remove the signature from someone else work. But
> feel free to remove your own name.
Indeed, one should ideally get permission to remove the @author tags
and move t
-0 on the @author tag since I'm not involved in OGNL.
I find it a bit rude to remove the signature from someone else work. But
feel free to remove your own name.
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 15/10/2011 10:59, Christian Grobmeier a écrit :
Again, the old discussion.
OGNL has @author tags. I do not lik
For me author tags and IDs in javadoc are helpful when looking at the
code from a source zip.
Gary
On Oct 15, 2011, at 5:42, sebb wrote:
> On 15 October 2011 10:26, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>> Can be useful, if one comes across a source file in isolation from SVN.
>>
>> What exactly can thi
Author tag should just point to the ASF.
Gary
On Oct 15, 2011, at 5:10, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> I'm in favor of removing @author tags too, developers are enlisted on the pom.
> usually at commons we keep @author tags in existing components, anyway
> OGNL is a fresh new codebase so +1 for it :)
Id in class javadoc for me.
Gary
On Oct 15, 2011, at 5:00, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Again, the old discussion.
>
> OGNL has @author tags. I do not like them. Who wants to keep them? I
> prefer a developers section in the pom and of course there is svn
> history.
>
> In addition:
> * $Id: AS
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
+1 for remove the author tag.
+0 for the svn header
Sent from my mobile device, so please excuse typos and brevity.
Maurizio Cucchiara
Il giorno 15/ott/2011 11.10, "Simone Tripodi" ha
scritto:
> I'm in favor of removing @author tags too, developers are enlisted on the
> pom.
> usually at commo
On 15 October 2011 10:26, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> Can be useful, if one comes across a source file in isolation from SVN.
>
> What exactly can this person then do with a revision number, my
> committer name and the date i have last commited if he does not know
> about svn revisions, who else
> Can be useful, if one comes across a source file in isolation from SVN.
What exactly can this person then do with a revision number, my
committer name and the date i have last commited if he does not know
about svn revisions, who else does commit and when last commit was?
> For example, in sour
On 15 October 2011 09:59, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Again, the old discussion.
>
> OGNL has @author tags. I do not like them. Who wants to keep them? I
> prefer a developers section in the pom and of course there is svn
> history.
>
> In addition:
> * $Id: ASTAdd.java 1183232 2011-10-14 07:40:
I'm in favor of removing @author tags too, developers are enlisted on the pom.
usually at commons we keep @author tags in existing components, anyway
OGNL is a fresh new codebase so +1 for it :)
All the best, have a nice WE!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejo
Again, the old discussion.
OGNL has @author tags. I do not like them. Who wants to keep them? I
prefer a developers section in the pom and of course there is svn
history.
In addition:
* $Id: ASTAdd.java 1183232 2011-10-14 07:40:32Z grobmeier $
This line must not be the first of the license head
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
30 matches
Mail list logo
