Re: [math] OpenGamma library

2011-10-14 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hello, first of all, I was the author of this very usefull statement on factories... Very constructive indeed. > > However it also shows that the improvement is only ~13% instead of the ~30% > reported by the benchmark in the paper... > could it be that their "naive" implementation as a 2D array is

Re: [math] OpenGamma library

2011-10-14 Thread Gilles Sadowski
> [...] > > I think that there was an important remark in the paper referred to in this > thread (2nd paragraph, page 10) saying (IIUC) that changing the storage > layout, from 2D to 1D, effectively led to a speed improvement *only* for > matrices of sizes larger than 1010. Which leads me to thin

Re: [math] OpenGamma library

2011-10-14 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. > > [...] > > > > I might have missed the goal of your proposal but I think that main point > > of the discussion had been about having a separate class for operations. I > > don't recall that a new implementation ("SymmetricMatrix") with a > > specifically optimized storage was not approve

Re: [math] OpenGamma library

2011-10-14 Thread Greg Sterijevski
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Gilles Sadowski < gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: > Hello. > > > > > I believe that the BlockMatrix approach you have taken is actually quite > > good and might yield a bit more stable optimization improvement than > simple > > loop unrolling. Consider operati

Re: [math] OpenGamma library

2011-10-14 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. > > I believe that the BlockMatrix approach you have taken is actually quite > good and might yield a bit more stable optimization improvement than simple > loop unrolling. Consider operations on non-overlapping blocks. You could > easily dispatch those in parallel. I agree that it is a bi

Re: [math] OpenGamma library

2011-10-14 Thread Greg Sterijevski
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 14/10/2011 20:08, Greg Sterijevski a écrit : > > I looked more closely at the package and it am impressed with the breadth >> of >> material covered. Moreover, this package will do to finance what Mahout is >> doing to companies like SAS

Re: svn commit: r1183484 - in /commons/proper/lang/trunk/src: main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/StringUtils.java site/changes/changes.xml test/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/StringUtilsTest.java

2011-10-14 Thread sebb
On 14 October 2011 21:12, wrote: > Author: ggregory > Date: Fri Oct 14 20:12:49 2011 > New Revision: 1183484 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1183484&view=rev > Log: (empty) ??? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr..

Re: [math] OpenGamma library

2011-10-14 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 14/10/2011 20:08, Greg Sterijevski a écrit : I looked more closely at the package and it am impressed with the breadth of material covered. Moreover, this package will do to finance what Mahout is doing to companies like SAS and SPSS. Having spent a good part of my career in finance, this pack

Re: [math] OpenGamma library

2011-10-14 Thread Greg Sterijevski
I looked more closely at the package and it am impressed with the breadth of material covered. Moreover, this package will do to finance what Mahout is doing to companies like SAS and SPSS. Having spent a good part of my career in finance, this package (and others) will put a lot of small 'analytic

Re: [math] OpenGamma library

2011-10-14 Thread Phil Steitz
On 10/14/11 7:47 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Hi, > > I just saw this article, that might be of interest for some of the > [math] devs. They claim to have found an optimization that is 1.6 > times faster than Commons Math : > > http://www.opengamma.com/blog/2011/10/14/maths-library-development Than

Re: [math] OpenGamma library

2011-10-14 Thread Greg Sterijevski
Interesting that they are making such heavy wind of their 'innovations' like loop unrolling. I would be interested in how much mileage they will get out of those tricks in more complicated code. I do not intend to disparage their approach, but maintaining code with too many cute optimizations costs

[math] OpenGamma library

2011-10-14 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi, I just saw this article, that might be of interest for some of the [math] devs. They claim to have found an optimization that is 1.6 times faster than Commons Math : http://www.opengamma.com/blog/2011/10/14/maths-library-development Emmanuel Bourg ---

Re: [ognl] Make us of changes.xml

2011-10-14 Thread Simone Tripodi
OK sounds I'm making confusion with other projects :) I'll investigate Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 3:58 PM, sebb wrote: > On 14 October 2011 14:50, Simone Tri

Re: [ognl] Make us of changes.xml

2011-10-14 Thread sebb
On 14 October 2011 14:50, Simone Tripodi wrote: > just to speak about it: what about putting the .vm template in the > remote-resources that bring the LICENSE and NOTICE txt files? AFAIK, we don't use that. Anyway, the NOTICE file is specific to each component. > If it could work, we could put

Re: [ognl] Make us of changes.xml

2011-10-14 Thread Simone Tripodi
just to speak about it: what about putting the .vm template in the remote-resources that bring the LICENSE and NOTICE txt files? If it could work, we could put as well basic assemblies descriptor - and components that require customization can easily modify them... Simo http://people.apache.org/~s

Re: [ognl] Make us of changes.xml

2011-10-14 Thread sebb
On 14 October 2011 14:02, Simone Tripodi wrote: > I love Seb's approach, if we could specify a way to reuse a shared > template to generate the release note s in every component, without > any extra setting, would be amazing! I looked into that already. I don't remember the exact details, but it

Re: [ognl] Make us of changes.xml

2011-10-14 Thread Simone Tripodi
I love Seb's approach, if we could specify a way to reuse a shared template to generate the release note s in every component, without any extra setting, would be amazing! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://ww

Re: [ognl] Make us of changes.xml

2011-10-14 Thread sebb
You can also use changes.xml to produce a release notes text file which can be included in the archives (and used in announces if required). This was added to Commons Parent recently: >>> mvn changes:announcement-generate -Prelease-notes Requires file src/changes/release-notes.vm. A sa

Re: [ognl] Make us of changes.xml

2011-10-14 Thread Simone Tripodi
see my previous message; just to give an example, take a look at the [digester] reports: http://commons.apache.org/digester/changes-report.html (changes.xml introduced only in last release) http://commons.apache.org/digester/jira-report.html (all jira issues) does it make sense? Simo http://peop

Re: [ognl] Make us of changes.xml

2011-10-14 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
Ok, then no objection from my side. Sent from my mobile device, so please excuse typos and brevity. Maurizio Cucchiara Il giorno 14/ott/2011 14.24, "Simone Tripodi" ha scritto: > having the changes.xml is what we already do in all other Commons > component, for the specific reason that the JIR

Re: [ognl] Make us of changes.xml

2011-10-14 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
I still no have preference, I would like to understand why we should add optional work. If there is a valid reason, why not? I guess that the next answer is could jiira automatically do what xml is able to do? Sent from my mobile device, so please excuse typos and brevity. Maurizio Cucchiara Il

Re: [ognl] Make us of changes.xml

2011-10-14 Thread Simone Tripodi
having the changes.xml is what we already do in all other Commons component, for the specific reason that the JIRA report just collect the list of fixed issues, collecting changes allows grouping them by release. +1 for changes Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.liv

Re: svn commit: r1183308 - /commons/proper/ognl/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml

2011-10-14 Thread Simone Tripodi
21-24 should be inverted to have a DESC order :P Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:22 PM, wrote: > Author: grobmeier > Date: Fri Oct 14 11:22:33 2011 > New Revis

Re: [ognl] Make us of changes.xml

2011-10-14 Thread Christian Grobmeier
So your preference is to get rid of changes.xml? Because changes would be visible on the site too On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Maurizio Cucchiara wrote: > Jiira is also able to compute release notes. > > ATM I can't, I will post a link later. > > Sent from my mobile device, so please excu

Re: [ognl] Make us of changes.xml

2011-10-14 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
Jiira is also able to compute release notes. ATM I can't, I will post a link later. Sent from my mobile device, so please excuse typos and brevity. Maurizio Cucchiara Il giorno 14/ott/2011 13.34, "Christian Grobmeier" ha scritto: > Hey guys, > > i would like to suggest we make consequent use

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-10-14 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[ognl] Make us of changes.xml

2011-10-14 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Hey guys, i would like to suggest we make consequent use of changes.xml. Whatever we do, we should open an issue, fix the stuff, and then add a comment to changes.xml. We do this in log4php and I feel it is very good: you always can find the changes per issues (via Fisheye- just check in with the

Re: [ognl] OGNL-9 fixed too?

2011-10-14 Thread Simone Tripodi
Yes, IIUC Mau took care of fixing it! thanks guys! best, Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara wrote: > AFAICR, it was fixed...  you can go

Re: [ognl] OGNL-9 fixed too?

2011-10-14 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
AFAICR, it was fixed... you can go for it. Twitter     :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara G+          :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 Linkedin    :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara Maurizio Cucchiara On 14 October 2011 11:32, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > This looks

[ognl] OGNL-9 fixed too?

2011-10-14 Thread Christian Grobmeier
This looks fixed too - can i set it to resolved? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-9 TO my knowledge i have runned all tests with v4 -- http://www.grobmeier.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.o

Re: [ognl] OGNL-13 resolved?

2011-10-14 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Actually I have resolved the issue (as all) - sorry for being unclear. I can live with what you have proposed. Cheers On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hallo! > I suggest to follow the Commons practice to put issues on 'Resolved' > status instead of 'Closed' and then move

Re: [ognl] OGNL-13 resolved?

2011-10-14 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hallo! I suggest to follow the Commons practice to put issues on 'Resolved' status instead of 'Closed' and then move to 'Closed' only once the RC has passed! Thoughts? best, Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://

Re: [ognl] OGNL-13 resolved?

2011-10-14 Thread Christian Grobmeier
closed then :-) On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara wrote: > So do I > Twitter     :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara > G+          :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 > Linkedin    :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara > > Maurizio Cucchiara > > > > On 14 Oct

Re: [ognl] OGNL-13 resolved?

2011-10-14 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
So do I Twitter     :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara G+          :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 Linkedin    :http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara Maurizio Cucchiara On 14 October 2011 10:52, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Yes, I'd say :) > thanks for taking care of it! > Si

Re: [ognl] OGNL-13 resolved?

2011-10-14 Thread Simone Tripodi
Yes, I'd say :) thanks for taking care of it! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hello guys, > > is this one resolved? > https:

Re: svn commit: r1183238 - /commons/proper/ognl/trunk/src/changes/changes.xml

2011-10-14 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Chris! AFAIK in the dev attribute you have to put your id, not complete name! HTH! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 9:53 AM, wrote: > Author: grobmeier > Date:

[ognl] OGNL-13 resolved?

2011-10-14 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Hello guys, is this one resolved? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-13 Looks like it - if yes, please close :-) Cheers Christian -- http://www.grobmeier.de - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org

Re: [ognl] cleanup ognl-21 - bw?

2011-10-14 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Gents, I have applied the patch as mentioned, but did not remove so much as initially thought. Looking at the discussion and and the code, I suddenly understood that this might take really a good risk. Therefore I would like to look at each of the methods, either fix or deprecate them one by one.