Re: [ognl] Codestyle

2011-10-08 Thread Christian Grobmeier
> when we started the OGNL in incubator, we lazily agreed on having the > Maven style[1], I personally don't see the need to change it now that > we are worging towards the release. OK good to know. Thanks Christian > Simo > > [1] http://maven.apache.org/developers/conventions/code.html > > http:

Re: [ognl] Codestyle

2011-10-08 Thread Simone Tripodi
Gute morgen Christian! when we started the OGNL in incubator, we lazily agreed on having the Maven style[1], I personally don't see the need to change it now that we are worging towards the release. Simo [1] http://maven.apache.org/developers/conventions/code.html http://people.apache.org/~simone

[ognl] Codestyle

2011-10-08 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Hi all, Checkstyle shows me more or less that we should go conform the Sun standards. I would love this, but want to make sure we have agreed on it. Because it would need a good bunch of bracket-moving Cheers Christian - To unsu

Re: svn commit: r1179928 - in [...]

2011-10-08 Thread Gilles Sadowski
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 02:29:21PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 10/8/11 2:12 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 07:21:23AM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> On 10/8/11 5:05 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > >>> Hi Phil. > >>> > Can you live with r1180315? > >>> [I guess that you

Re: [nabla] INVOKEVIRTUAL not handled yet

2011-10-08 Thread Phil Steitz
On 10/8/11 2:24 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > > > Phil Steitz a écrit : > >> I am getting RTE with message above when I try to run the example >> under "updating the base and differentiated objects" in the docs. >> Is this example supposed to work with the code in trunk? Also, I am > I'll look at t

Re: svn commit: r1179928 - in [...]

2011-10-08 Thread Phil Steitz
On 10/8/11 2:12 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 07:21:23AM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 10/8/11 5:05 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: >>> Hi Phil. >>> Can you live with r1180315? >>> [I guess that you are talking to me.] >>> >>> I still stand with the arguments of my other p

Re: [nabla] INVOKEVIRTUAL not handled yet

2011-10-08 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Phil Steitz a écrit : >I am getting RTE with message above when I try to run the example >under "updating the base and differentiated objects" in the docs. >Is this example supposed to work with the code in trunk? Also, I am I'll look at this tomorrow, but I think for now you need to have a

Re: svn commit: r1179928 - in [...]

2011-10-08 Thread Gilles Sadowski
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 07:21:23AM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 10/8/11 5:05 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hi Phil. > > > >> Can you live with r1180315? > > [I guess that you are talking to me.] > > > > I still stand with the arguments of my other post about this "1e-9" constant > > being confu

[nabla] INVOKEVIRTUAL not handled yet

2011-10-08 Thread Phil Steitz
I am getting RTE with message above when I try to run the example under "updating the base and differentiated objects" in the docs. Is this example supposed to work with the code in trunk? Also, I am assuming s/ForwardAlgorithmicDifferentiator/ForwardModeAlgorithmicDifferentiator throughout. Cor

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-io (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-10-08 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-io has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue af

Re: [math] SYMMLQ implementation notes

2011-10-08 Thread Ted Dunning
2011/10/8 Sébastien Brisard > FURTHER QUESTION: do you think that this reformatting of the code > (plus renaming of some variables) could be offensive to the original > developer? Should I be careful with that? His original contribution is > fully aknowledged anyway. > I have never seen an insta

Re: [math] SYMMLQ implementation notes

2011-10-08 Thread Phil Steitz
On 10/8/11 9:20 AM, Sébastien Brisard wrote: >> I would encourage you, though, to add as much inline, class and >> javadoc documentation as possible, since that is what developers >> looking at the source will see immediately. >> > Yes, I had second thoughts on putting the notes in an external file

Re: [math] SYMMLQ implementation notes

2011-10-08 Thread Sébastien Brisard
> > I would encourage you, though, to add as much inline, class and > javadoc documentation as possible, since that is what developers > looking at the source will see immediately. > Yes, I had second thoughts on putting the notes in an external file... The main benefit being mathematical formattin

Re: [math] SYMMLQ implementation notes

2011-10-08 Thread Phil Steitz
On 10/8/11 7:44 AM, Sébastien Brisard wrote: > Hi, > I've spent quite a lot of time going through Pr. Saunders' FORTRAN > implementation of this algorithm, and the Java port is almost ready. > This algorithm is quite difficult to read, because some quantities > required at iteration k can be comput

Re: [DISCUSS] Restyling the commons-skin

2011-10-08 Thread Greg Sterijevski
+1 from me. Looks great!

[math] SYMMLQ implementation notes

2011-10-08 Thread Sébastien Brisard
Hi, I've spent quite a lot of time going through Pr. Saunders' FORTRAN implementation of this algorithm, and the Java port is almost ready. This algorithm is quite difficult to read, because some quantities required at iteration k can be computed only in iteration (k+1). So one must be careful in m

Re: svn commit: r1179928 - in [...]

2011-10-08 Thread Phil Steitz
On 10/8/11 5:05 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hi Phil. > >> Can you live with r1180315? > [I guess that you are talking to me.] > > I still stand with the arguments of my other post about this "1e-9" constant > being confusing for the "non numerics-aware" users. > However, I can understand that we

Re: [all] JIRA "lead"

2011-10-08 Thread Phil Steitz
On 10/8/11 7:14 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Hi all, > > I noticed in the JIRA settings that Phil is registered as lead for > all commons components. Should I change this setting and put > myself there as PMC chair or should we select one person for each > component ? > > I don't even know what "lead

[all] JIRA "lead"

2011-10-08 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hi all, I noticed in the JIRA settings that Phil is registered as lead for all commons components. Should I change this setting and put myself there as PMC chair or should we select one person for each component ? I don't even know what "lead" role is in JIRA. There are already several admin

Re: svn commit: r1179928 - in [...]

2011-10-08 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi Phil. > Can you live with r1180315? [I guess that you are talking to me.] I still stand with the arguments of my other post about this "1e-9" constant being confusing for the "non numerics-aware" users. However, I can understand that we may want to also document the departure from the math d

Re: [DISCUSS] Restyling the commons-skin

2011-10-08 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi Simone That looks very nice! Let's get the ball rolling on this. I currently have limited time, but I'm here to help with anything Maven-related in the skin. For me there is no need to do this work on a branch, I don't see us releasing another version of the current skin any time soon. If the

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-10-08 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This