I'm not sure overriding the template is the correct solution. For the vfs
release I had to manually rename the file when I scp'd it to the dist directory.
Ralph
On Sep 29, 2011, at 1:07 PM, ohe...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: oheger
> Date: Thu Sep 29 20:07:37 2011
> New Revision: 1177415
>
>
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Gary Gregory
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi All:
>>> >
>>> > Does any one know how to pull down the l
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Gary Gregory
>> wrote:
>> > Hi All:
>> >
>> > Does any one know how to pull down the lang3 tests jar out of Maven
>> Central
>> > with Ivy (from Ant)?
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> > Hi All:
> >
> > Does any one know how to pull down the lang3 tests jar out of Maven
> Central
> > with Ivy (from Ant)?
> >
> > I use:
> >
> > > conf="...myconfs..." rev="3.0.1"/>
Will do. -Greg
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Gilles Sadowski <
gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
> Hello Greg.
>
> > I have done what you suggested and notice that it (the optimizer) takes
> > humongous steps in the search for an upper bound. I tried making the
> initial
> > step size small
Okay. As per your other email, I was not aware that the code was in flux.
Thanks,
-Greg
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Gilles Sadowski <
gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> >
> > I would like to add the following method to BOBYQA:
> >
> > /**
> > *
> > * @return the n
Thank you.
I am working on making my Limited Dependent Variable Regressions agnostic to
the optimizer used. Plug and play (to the extent it is possible) is my aim.
I will try to concoct a test which hits this code path. I have used the C
version of BOBYQA under the COIN infrastructure. It is a dec
Hello Greg.
> I have done what you suggested and notice that it (the optimizer) takes
> humongous steps in the search for an upper bound. I tried making the initial
> step size smaller, but to no avail.
Again, it might be most useful if you could factor a small unit test out of
your use-case, so
Hi.
>
> I would like to add the following method to BOBYQA:
>
> /**
> *
> * @return the number of interpolation points
> */
> public int getNumberOfInterpolationPoints(){
> return this.numberOfInterpolationPoints;
> }
>
> Any objections?
I think that, before
Hi.
The work to be done on "BOBYQAOptimizer" is discussed in issue 621:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-621
There is still a lot to do on this code. And I wouldn't advise you to use it
as is because the interface is likely to change: In fact, CM lacks an
interface/base class for opti
Gary Gregory wrote:
> Good day to you all:
>
> I have prepared Commons IO 2.1 RC4.
>
> The difference with RC3 is that this RC contains up-to-date
> RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>
> Tag:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/io/tags/commons-io-2.1-RC4/
>
> Site:
>
> https://people.apache.org
Hello Luc.
> >
> >Referring to:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-650
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-675
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-676
> >
> >In the absence of additional comments I'm proposing to resolve those issues.
> >Please let me know w
Hello All,
I would like to add the following method to BOBYQA:
/**
*
* @return the number of interpolation points
*/
public int getNumberOfInterpolationPoints(){
return this.numberOfInterpolationPoints;
}
Any objections?
-Greg
Hello All,
I am testing some Limited Dependent Variable regressions and in shopping for
an optimizer I ran BOBYQA. I got the following exception:
If this exception is thrown, just remove it from the code
org.apache.commons.math.optimization.direct.PathIsExploredException: If this
exception is thr
Gilles,
I have done what you suggested and notice that it (the optimizer) takes
humongous steps in the search for an upper bound. I tried making the initial
step size smaller, but to no avail.
The Powell optimizer flies very quickly to an optimum. Maybe there is some
misunderstanding in my usage
Hold off on 675. I owe you a couple of changes, related to naming and some
other issues we discussed on the ML.
-Greg
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 29/09/2011 18:04, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
>
> Hello.
>>
>> Referring to:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/b
Le 29/09/2011 18:04, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
Hello.
Referring to:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-650
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-675
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-676
In the absence of additional comments I'm proposing to resolve those issues.
Hello.
Referring to:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-650
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-675
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-676
In the absence of additional comments I'm proposing to resolve those issues.
Please let me know whether there are pending objecti
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Sep 28, 2011, at 10:53 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 28 September 2011 18:20, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:12 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 28 September 2
test (sorry for the noise)
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi Hen!
> I had a review in the past days, I think we should be ready for a new
> release :)
> Have a nice day and thanks for taking care of it!
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99
Hi Hen!
I had a review in the past days, I think we should be ready for a new release :)
Have a nice day and thanks for taking care of it!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Bill Speirs wrote:
> I think so... +1 vote from me.
>
On Sep 28, 2011, at 10:53 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 28 September 2011 18:20, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:12 PM, sebb wrote:
>>>
On 28 September 2011 18:08, wrote:
> Author: ggregory
> Date: Wed Sep 2
Great work, Sebastien!
Technically, the ICLA or software grant should be submitted directly to the
secretary by the contributor, but I would just go ahead and send it along.
There is no need to provide any explanation.
Pls forward Michael's note below to priv...@commons.apache.org, so we have
Resending from my Apache account, the message did not make it to the ML for
some reason. Arg.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Gary Gregory
Date: Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 8:58 AM
Subject: [VOTE][io] Release Commons IO 2.1-RC4
To: Commons Developers List
Good day to you all:
I have pr
Pardon my bad link, binaries are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-005/
Gary
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Good day to you all:
>
> I have prepared Commons IO 2.1 RC4.
>
> The difference with RC3 is that this RC contains up-to-date
Good day to you all:
I have prepared Commons IO 2.1 RC4.
The difference with RC3 is that this RC contains up-to-date
RELEASE-NOTES.txt
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/io/tags/commons-io-2.1-RC4/
Site:
https://people.apache.org/builds/commons/io/2.1/RC4/
Binaries:
https://r
I think so... +1 vote from me.
Bill-
On Sep 29, 2011 1:54 AM, "Henri Yandell" wrote:
> Are the previous issues now put to bed? ie) Should I roll an RC2?
>
> Hen
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
>
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbutils has an issue affecting its community integration.
This iss
29 matches
Mail list logo
