Hi Niall + Gary,
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Jörg Schaible
> wrote:
>> Hi Gary,
>>
>> Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>>> Good day to you all:
>>>
>>> I have prepared Commons IO 2.1 RC3 (there was no RC1 and RC2 vote
>>> because I botched things up and left the tags in SVN.
Are the previous issues now put to bed? ie) Should I roll an RC2?
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:31 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 28 September 2011 18:20, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:12 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>>> On 28 September 2011 18:08, wrote:
>>> > Author: ggregory
>>> > Date: Wed Sep 28 17:08:45 2011
>>> > New Revision: 1176967
>>> >
>>> > URL: htt
Good news! Please read below Pr. Saunders's answer. Should I send the
ICLA through the usual way (secretary@ if I remember well), or shhould
I use another channel, explaining precisely to the recipient at Apache
what it is all about?
Sébastien
Dear Sébastien,
Thank you for your interest in SYMMLQ
Hi Phil,
no Java code available. I'm polishing up my port, will submit it in
the coming days (weeks?) for you to review
Sébastien
2011/9/28 Phil Steitz :
> On 9/27/11 11:58 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> CPL is a weak-copyleft license - ie) putting source derived from it
>> inside Commons Math will m
On Sep 28, 2011, at 21:42, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Hi Gary,
>>
>> Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>>> Good day to you all:
>>>
>>> I have prepared Commons IO 2.1 RC3 (there was no RC1 and RC2 vote because
>>> I botched things up and left the tags
Thank you for the review. I'll get to it tomorrow.
Gary
On Sep 28, 2011, at 18:08, "Jörg Schaible" wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> Good day to you all:
>>
>> I have prepared Commons IO 2.1 RC3 (there was no RC1 and RC2 vote because
>> I botched things up and left the tags in SVN.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> Good day to you all:
>>
>> I have prepared Commons IO 2.1 RC3 (there was no RC1 and RC2 vote because
>> I botched things up and left the tags in SVN.)
>>
>> Tag:
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commo
My fumble. I got it right for rc3.
Gary
On Sep 28, 2011, at 20:38, sebb wrote:
> On 28 September 2011 18:46, wrote:
>> Author: ggregory
>> Date: Wed Sep 28 17:46:49 2011
>> New Revision: 1176985
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1176985&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Create commons-io-2.1-RC2
Rc1 and 2 had no votes. Just my fumbling around. They can be deleted.
Gary
On Sep 28, 2011, at 20:37, sebb wrote:
> On 28 September 2011 18:45, wrote:
>> Author: ggregory
>> Date: Wed Sep 28 17:45:42 2011
>> New Revision: 1176984
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1176984&view=rev
>>
On 28 September 2011 18:46, wrote:
> Author: ggregory
> Date: Wed Sep 28 17:46:49 2011
> New Revision: 1176985
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1176985&view=rev
> Log:
> Create commons-io-2.1-RC2 tag
Ditto - what's this for?
> Added:
> commons/proper/io/tags/commons-io-2.1-RC2/
>
On 28 September 2011 18:45, wrote:
> Author: ggregory
> Date: Wed Sep 28 17:45:42 2011
> New Revision: 1176984
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1176984&view=rev
> Log:
> Creating commons-io-2.1-RC1 tag
Looks like it was re-created?
I'm not sure we need the old RC1 tag anymore.
Was it
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Peter Firmstone
wrote:
> I've just realised the code probably isn't a good fit with commons
> collections, primarily because it utilises Generics.
There is a branch that supports generics, just not enough love to
finish it for a release.
Matt
>
> On 29/09/2011 9
I've just realised the code probably isn't a good fit with commons
collections, primarily because it utilises Generics.
On 29/09/2011 9:07 AM, Peter Firmstone wrote:
These reference collection utilities don't really belong in our
project, but they do assist to solve some fundamental problems us
These reference collection utilities don't really belong in our project,
but they do assist to solve some fundamental problems using references
in collections, the implementation is abstracted so it can be utilised
for any valid Collections Framework Interface implementation, allowing
the user
Hi Gary,
Gary Gregory wrote:
> Good day to you all:
>
> I have prepared Commons IO 2.1 RC3 (there was no RC1 and RC2 vote because
> I botched things up and left the tags in SVN.)
>
> Tag:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/io/tags/commons-io-2.1-RC3/
>
> Site:
>
> https://peopl
On 9/27/11 11:58 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> CPL is a weak-copyleft license - ie) putting source derived from it
> inside Commons Math will make all of Commons Math CPL licensed.
>
> If Mr Saunders is the only copyright owner, and were happy to sign a
> grant or ICLA, then the CPL wouldn't apply in
Good day to you all:
I have prepared Commons IO 2.1 RC3 (there was no RC1 and RC2 vote because I
botched things up and left the tags in SVN.)
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/io/tags/commons-io-2.1-RC3/
Site:
https://people.apache.org/builds/commons/io/2.1/RC3/
Binaries:
htt
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:31 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 28 September 2011 18:20, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:12 PM, sebb wrote:
> >
> >> On 28 September 2011 18:08, wrote:
> >> > Author: ggregory
> >> > Date: Wed Sep 28 17:08:45 2011
> >> > New Revision: 1176967
> >> >
> >> >
On 28 September 2011 18:20, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:12 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 28 September 2011 18:08, wrote:
>> > Author: ggregory
>> > Date: Wed Sep 28 17:08:45 2011
>> > New Revision: 1176967
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1176967&view=rev
>> > Log:
On 28 September 2011 18:08, wrote:
> Author: ggregory
> Date: Wed Sep 28 17:08:45 2011
> New Revision: 1176967
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1176967&view=rev
> Log:
> Remove tag, fixing POM and will retag for RC1
Please tag as RC2 instead; tags are supposed to be immutable.
> Remove
Please apply DBUTILS-78_Future_v3.diff which I uploaded to JIRA. That
should fix the race condition in the unit tests, and prevent GUMP from
failing.
Thanks...
Bill-
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Bill Speirs wrote:
> Yea... it's a race condition, so it's not always going to trigger.
> I've u
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 6:29 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 28 September 2011 11:22, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
> > I wan't able to plug extensions in profiles.
>
> But we already have a site plugin reference in the M3 profile - can't
> one just add the dependency to that?
>
Fixed in SVN. Good catch.
Thank
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Hello.
> I'm sorry. When I said I wanted to write on behalf of the "CM
> community", I meant I didn't want to single myself out, especially
> based on the fact that some have been involved for a long time in this
> project.
If you use "community" in the Apache sense, then strictly speaking, it is
On 28 September 2011 11:22, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> I wan't able to plug extensions in profiles.
But we already have a site plugin reference in the M3 profile - can't
one just add the dependency to that?
> Indeed, ssh support comes "for free" with mvn2
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simone
I wan't able to plug extensions in profiles.
Indeed, ssh support comes "for free" with mvn2
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:17 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 28 September 2011 04:35, wrote:
>> Author: ggregory
>> Date: Wed Sep 28 03:35:42
On 28 September 2011 04:35, wrote:
> Author: ggregory
> Date: Wed Sep 28 03:35:42 2011
> New Revision: 1176700
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1176700&view=rev
> Log:
> To deploy a site with a non-built-in protocol, you need to add the
> corresponding wagon provider. Out of the box, Ma
I'm sorry. When I said I wanted to write on behalf of the "CM
community", I meant I didn't want to single myself out, especially
based on the fact that some have been involved for a long time in this
project.
Anyway, I've sent an email to Pr. Saunders, with attached ICLA, let's
see what his answer
Hi.
>
> I am working on limited dependent variable regressions. I am testing part of
> a logit regression routine. As part of the estimation technique I am need to
> do some nonlinear optimization. Using the
> NonLinearConjugateGradientOptimizer, I submit my problem, but get the
> following excep
Hello.
> I understand. It indeed didn't occur to me that that was what
> "Contributor may choose to distribute the Program in object code form
> under its own license agreement, provided that it complies with the
> terms and conditions of this Agreement". This might indeed be a
> problem...
> Whic
I understand. It indeed didn't occur to me that that was what
"Contributor may choose to distribute the Program in object code form
under its own license agreement, provided that it complies with the
terms and conditions of this Agreement". This might indeed be a
problem...
Which takes us back to t
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbutils has an issue affecting its community integration.
This iss
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
34 matches
Mail list logo
