The site for BSF is still on jakarta.apache.org. Is someone working on
moving it over to Commons?
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Oracle advise using AtomicReference for any threaded cases, and we
have MutableObject for other cases. I'm very dubious about adding a
second version of the same class.
Stephen
Limited mobile access
On 11/09/2011, Henri Yandell (JIRA) wrote:
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-
I sent the original to the wrong thread, my apologies!
Sebastian,
The only observation I made is in the JIRA notes. Use thread safe
collections for the listener lists. There is a bit of overhead, but if you
have long running optimizations you might want to connect, get the state of
the optimizati
Thanks, -Greg
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Gilles Sadowski <
gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
>
> Wrong ML thread.
>
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 03:49:25PM -0500, Greg Sterijevski wrote:
> > Sebastian,
> >
> > The only observation I made is in the JIRA notes. Use thread safe
> > collections
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 5:59 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 September 2011 08:35, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Good morning guys,
>> I just did an experiment on my local checkout of the parent pom,
>> adding the buildnumber plugin, in order to have a new
>> `Implementation-Build` manifest entry in the jars, w
On 11 September 2011 03:55, Ralph Goers wrote:
> When you say trunk would be replaced by the tag name would that be the tag
> that ends with RCx? If so I'd have a problem with that as that tag won't
> exist for long.
Yes, as previously discussed at length in this thread.
> Ralph
>
> On Sep 10
When you say trunk would be replaced by the tag name would that be the tag that
ends with RCx? If so I'd have a problem with that as that tag won't exist for
long.
Ralph
On Sep 10, 2011, at 6:00 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 10 September 2011 21:04, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 10, 2011, at 10:34
On 10 September 2011 21:11, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Why is generating all the reports a problem?
They may not be relevant, especially for multimodule components.
> Ralph
>
> On Sep 10, 2011, at 10:36 AM, s...@apache.org wrote:
>
>> Author: sebb
>> Date: Sat Sep 10 17:36:31 2011
>> New Revision: 116
On 10 September 2011 21:04, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Sep 10, 2011, at 10:34 AM, sebb wrote:
>>
>>
>> I don't see what the harm is in adding the header line.
>
> Before I agree with you I'd want to see what the exact definition would be.
The manifest config in the pom is:
${implementation.build}
On 10 September 2011 21:12, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 9/10/11 10:34 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 10 September 2011 17:58, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 9/10/11 9:21 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
Are you guys arguing about manifests or build processes. I can't really
tell.
There is no perfect bui
Sounds great.
Especially if the implementation of the sub-class is deferred until the
first is completed.
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Gilles Sadowski <
gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Coming back to this with a simple idea that may hopefully satisfy everyone.
>
> What do y
Hello.
Coming back to this with a simple idea that may hopefully satisfy everyone.
What do you think of having one class that performs all operations by
directly applying the computational formulae, without worrying about NaN
or infinities. This would be represent the complex field, would be simp
On 9/10/11 11:02 AM, Greg Sterijevski wrote:
> One more question, if the request list is null, what is the proper return? A
> null or is an exception returned?
IAE
Phil
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Greg Sterijevski
> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Another mostly exceptional question from me! In
On 9/10/11 10:15 AM, Greg Sterijevski wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Another mostly exceptional question from me! In the
> interface UpdatingMultipleLinearRegression, we have regress() and
> regress(int[] variablesToInclude).
>
> 1. What is the appropriate exception to throw when there is a variable index
>
Wrong ML thread.
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 03:49:25PM -0500, Greg Sterijevski wrote:
> Sebastian,
>
> The only observation I made is in the JIRA notes. Use thread safe
> collections for the listener lists. There is a bit of overhead, but if you
> have long running optimizations you might want to c
On 9/10/11 12:45 AM, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> Thanks to you both for your review.
>
>> 0) maybe incrementIterationCount in the manager should be called
>> startIteration
>>
> OK
>> 1) I guess TooManyEvaluations is the only thing left to throw, but
>> MaxIterationsExceeded or even something new li
Sebastian,
The only observation I made is in the JIRA notes. Use thread safe
collections for the listener lists. There is a bit of overhead, but if you
have long running optimizations you might want to connect, get the state of
the optimization and then disconnect.
Thanks,
-Greg
On Sat, Sep 10,
On 9/10/11 10:34 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 10 September 2011 17:58, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 9/10/11 9:21 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>> Are you guys arguing about manifests or build processes. I can't really
>>> tell.
>>>
>>> There is no perfect build process. I'm not a fan of voting on an RC and
>>> th
Why is generating all the reports a problem?
Ralph
On Sep 10, 2011, at 10:36 AM, s...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: sebb
> Date: Sat Sep 10 17:36:31 2011
> New Revision: 1167565
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1167565&view=rev
> Log:
> Don't use Apache POM 10
>
> Modified:
>commons
On Sep 10, 2011, at 10:34 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>
> I don't see what the harm is in adding the header line.
Before I agree with you I'd want to see what the exact definition would be.
Ralph
On 10 September 2011 20:16, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> +1 I I like it!!!
>
>> + ${buildScmBranch}/r${buildNumber};
>> ${maven.build.timestamp}
Except that does not work; the variable is actually ${scmBranch}, in
spite of what the description and log message says ...
I've changed it to
+${
+1 I I like it!!!
> + ${buildScmBranch}/r${buildNumber};
> ${maven.build.timestamp}
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 01:02:30PM -0500, Greg Sterijevski wrote:
> One more question, if the request list is null, what is the proper return? A
> null or is an exception returned?
I think that we didn't quite decided whether to always check for null
argument, or let the JVM generate a standard "N
Hello.
>
> Another mostly exceptional question from me! In the
> interface UpdatingMultipleLinearRegression, we have regress() and
> regress(int[] variablesToInclude).
>
> 1. What is the appropriate exception to throw when there is a variable index
> in the array which does not exist in the data
One more question, if the request list is null, what is the proper return? A
null or is an exception returned?
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Greg Sterijevski
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Another mostly exceptional question from me! In the
> interface UpdatingMultipleLinearRegression, we have regress(
Hi.
> Thanks to you both for your review.
Unfortunately, I didn't have the time to thoroughly read the code.
>
> >
> > 0) maybe incrementIterationCount in the manager should be called
> > startIteration
> >
> OK
> >
> > 1) I guess TooManyEvaluations is the only thing left to throw, but
> > MaxI
Made the changes in my copy, will push them along with the changes to make
SimpleRegression compliant with the UpdatingMultipleRegression interface.
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Greg Sterijevski
wrote:
> Sorry about the formatting. I looked through checkstyle report and my zeal
> to eliminat
On 10 September 2011 17:58, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 9/10/11 9:21 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>> Are you guys arguing about manifests or build processes. I can't really tell.
>>
>> There is no perfect build process. I'm not a fan of voting on an RC and then
>> renaming the tag and so with VFS I created
Sorry about the formatting. I looked through checkstyle report and my zeal
to eliminate extraneous whitespace was only matched by my need to add
whitespace around arguments!!!
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 9/9/11 9:18 PM, gr...@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: gregs
> >
Hi All,
Another mostly exceptional question from me! In the
interface UpdatingMultipleLinearRegression, we have regress() and
regress(int[] variablesToInclude).
1. What is the appropriate exception to throw when there is a variable index
in the array which does not exist in the data? For example
On 9/10/11 9:21 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Are you guys arguing about manifests or build processes. I can't really tell.
>
> There is no perfect build process. I'm not a fan of voting on an RC and then
> renaming the tag and so with VFS I created the tag over and over again for
> each candidate. Th
On 9/9/11 1:54 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 11:26:02AM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 9/9/11 9:27 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>>> I don't think that is correct.
>>>
>>> It is not the case that there was some element in the input that was too
>>> small. For instance, this matrix
Sorry Phil, my bad! Will remember for next time. Thanks, -Greg
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Looks good. One small thing. The process we usually follow in
> [math] is to RESOLVE when an issue is fixed in trunk and the CLOSE
> when a release including the fix has been c
Are you guys arguing about manifests or build processes. I can't really tell.
There is no perfect build process. I'm not a fan of voting on an RC and then
renaming the tag and so with VFS I created the tag over and over again for each
candidate. That has its own pitfalls but works since Nexus s
On 10 September 2011 16:28, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 9/10/11 8:18 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 10 September 2011 16:09, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> Could be I am misunderstanding the proposal here, but IIUC there is another
>>> problem when it comes to release jars. Current practice is to create the
>>> ja
On 9/9/11 10:19 PM, Greg Sterijevski wrote:
> Okay, I have begun nibbling on the doc. I will push a few changes I made in
> connection to doing no intercept regression in SimpleRegression.
Great! I usually now fail at this, but I used to try to bundle all
of the following in commits that change o
On 9/10/11 8:18 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 10 September 2011 16:09, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> Could be I am misunderstanding the proposal here, but IIUC there is another
>> problem when it comes to release jars. Current practice is to create the
>> jars from what ends up being the final RC tag. This tag
Looks good. One small thing. The process we usually follow in
[math] is to RESOLVE when an issue is fixed in trunk and the CLOSE
when a release including the fix has been cut. So you sort of
jumped the gun on this one. OK (IMO) to leave this one as is, but
if we want to be tidy, we should reope
On 9/9/11 9:18 PM, gr...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: gregs
> Date: Sat Sep 10 04:18:31 2011
> New Revision: 1167451
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1167451&view=rev
> Log:
> (MATH-649) SimpleRegression needs the ability to suppress the intercept
The plugin was able to pick this up
On 10 September 2011 16:09, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Could be I am misunderstanding the proposal here, but IIUC there is another
> problem when it comes to release jars. Current practice is to create the
> jars from what ends up being the final RC tag. This tag is then either
> copied or moved to
On 10 September 2011 15:46, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 9/9/11 2:34 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 9 September 2011 19:58, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 9/9/11 12:35 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Good morning guys,
I just did an experiment on my local checkout of the parent pom,
adding the buildnumber
Could be I am misunderstanding the proposal here, but IIUC there is another
problem when it comes to release jars. Current practice is to create the jars
from what ends up being the final RC tag. This tag is then either copied or
moved to the release tag, which becomes the definitive source.
On 9/9/11 2:34 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 September 2011 19:58, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 9/9/11 12:35 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>> Good morning guys,
>>> I just did an experiment on my local checkout of the parent pom,
>>> adding the buildnumber plugin, in order to have a new
>>> `Implementation-Buil
Am 10.09.2011 06:36, schrieb Stefan Bodewig:
On 2011-09-09, Oliver Heger wrote:
After the version number in pom.xml was changed to 1.8-SNAPSHOT the
gump build fails. IIUC, it still searches for a jar ending in
1.7-SNAPSHOT.
I had a look at the gump descriptor in commons-proper.xml, but I did
On 10 September 2011 07:47, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2011/9/9 sebb :
>> On 9 September 2011 21:50, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> 2011/9/9 sebb :
On 9 September 2011 14:53, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Maybe possible to add something for folks using git svn.
>
> An other profile activated if .gi
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Thanks to you both for your review.
>
> 0) maybe incrementIterationCount in the manager should be called
> startIteration
>
OK
>
> 1) I guess TooManyEvaluations is the only thing left to throw, but
> MaxIterationsExceeded or even something new like IllegalIteration
> might make sense here (bad nam
47 matches
Mail list logo
