On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 10:47:41PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I was about to do this:
> throw MathRuntimeException.createArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException(
> LocalizedFormats.OUT_OF_RANGE_SIMPLE, index, 0,
> parameters.length);
>
> but remembered that this is now deprecated. Do
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=11066&projectId=95
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Mon 8 Aug 2011 06:25:34 +
Finished at: Mon 8 Aug 2011 06:26:21 +
Total time: 46s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
I was about to do this:
throw MathRuntimeException.createArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException(
LocalizedFormats.OUT_OF_RANGE_SIMPLE, index, 0,
parameters.length);
but remembered that this is now deprecated. Do I need to add a
MathArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException extending the JDK exce
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=11063&projectId=95
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Mon 8 Aug 2011 05:23:35 +
Finished at: Mon 8 Aug 2011 05:23:56 +
Total time: 21s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
On 8/6/11 9:30 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2011-08-06, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> On 8/5/11 9:40 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>>> This means ZipArchiveOutputStream must decide whether it is going to use
>>> the ZIP64 format before it knows whether it would actually need it or
>>> not. If it signals i
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=11060&projectId=95
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Mon 8 Aug 2011 04:20:55 +
Finished at: Mon 8 Aug 2011 04:21:49 +
Total time: 54s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 3:43 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 7 August 2011 22:59, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Oliver Heger
>> wrote:
>>> Maven build works fine on Windows 7 with Java 1.5 and 1.6. I also tested the
>>> ant build successfully. Artifacts and site look good.
>>>
>>>
Hi.
> [...]
> >
> >However, I'm concerned that the "stress" test ("testLinearCombination1")
> >taken from your test case for Vector3D might not be stringent enough. [I
> >think that while changing my implemementation, the test was still passing
> >just before I dicovered that I was using an unitia
On 7 August 2011 22:59, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Oliver Heger
> wrote:
>> Maven build works fine on Windows 7 with Java 1.5 and 1.6. I also tested the
>> ant build successfully. Artifacts and site look good.
>>
>> Minor nits:
>> - The release notes contain some XML
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=11052&projectId=95
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sun 7 Aug 2011 22:26:39 +
Finished at: Sun 7 Aug 2011 22:27:23 +
Total time: 44s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
> Maven build works fine on Windows 7 with Java 1.5 and 1.6. I also tested the
> ant build successfully. Artifacts and site look good.
>
> Minor nits:
> - The release notes contain some XML entities (< >) which is a bit
> strange because it is a
Le 06/08/2011 21:16, Henri Yandell a écrit :
Second try for 3.0.1 :)
Three changes - fixed version for the archive files, proper fix to
LANG-727 and missing javadoc implemented.
RC2 is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0.1-RC2/
SVN:
http://svn.apache.org/re
Maven build works fine on Windows 7 with Java 1.5 and 1.6. I also tested
the ant build successfully. Artifacts and site look good.
Minor nits:
- The release notes contain some XML entities (< >) which is a bit
strange because it is a plain text file.
- When I generate the site locally I get a d
Hi Mark!
Exactly the classloader problem is what we try to solve in log4j-2.0. Tomcat is
by far not the only project which suffers a lot from this shortcoming.
OpenWebBeans, MyFaces, OpenJPA, etc - all projects which are usually in a
shared classpath have the problem that they cannot cleanly us
On 08/07/2011 12:17 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
I use eclipse for this.
I like Jörg suggestion too but have one question: is there a problem
if two different classes have the same id ? They will differ by fully
qualified class name, of course, but is it sufficient ?
nothing wrong with two clas
Your selection methodology might be more complicated than pairwise
comparison. So I think you would have to pass the entire set of remaining
columns. That is an implementation detail, however.
On the interface, yes the public face should not expose the constructor
which takes the PivotStrategyComp
To avoid having the strategy method being overriden in the constructor, we
could instead implement a constructor that takes a column Comparator that
determines if two columns should be exchanged at each stage.
In the interest of maintaining a clean interface, I don't know if this
constructor shoul
Le 06/08/2011 19:00, Phil Steitz a écrit :
On 8/6/11 5:21 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Sébastien Brisard wrote:
Hi,
I've just realized that many classes I've submitted do not define
serialVersionUID, which raises a warning. I have to say that it's
something I've never done myself, but I'd like to
Le 06/08/2011 13:15, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
Hi.
[...]
I've allowed myself to adapt your code to an array version of the
accurate "linearCombination" (committed in revision 1154416).
Thanks Gilles,
I wanted to add this too and simply forgot :-(
Here is a micro-benchmark (for an array
Chris,
In regard to the pivoting, do you think that it would be useful to allow
subclasses to pivot using other strategies? The pivoting I have looks for
the next column with the largest norm. For most garden variety problems this
will be okay. However, you can (I am not sure how effective this wi
2011/8/7 Mark Thomas :
> On 07/08/2011 09:31, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>>> Or maybe Log4j 2 could replace [logging].
>>
>> If we really have to reconsider this stuff, then I'd propose to
>>
>> a) Use java.util.logging, because it doesn't requ
sebb wrote:
> On 6 August 2011 19:37, sebb wrote:
>> On 5 August 2011 07:28, Jörg Schaible
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Gary Gregory wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Jörg Schaible
wrote:
> Hi Hen,
>
> Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> I'd like to release 3.0.1 of L
Oooops, the * below should read MATH-630.
Chris
On 7 August 2011 13:28, Chris Nix wrote:
> Thanks, Greg, for looking more at this. Apologies I've not been able to
> focus on this too much recently.
>
> Yes, the approach above works, however the solvers also require a change so
> that t
Thanks, Greg, for looking more at this. Apologies I've not been able to
focus on this too much recently.
Yes, the approach above works, however the solvers also require a change so
that they don't unexpectedly solve for a permuted matrix. Additionally, a
getRank() method can now be implemented m
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On 07/08/2011 09:31, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> Or maybe Log4j 2 could replace [logging].
>
> If we really have to reconsider this stuff, then I'd propose to
>
> a) Use java.util.logging, because it doesn't require any additional
> dependen
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Or maybe Log4j 2 could replace [logging].
If we really have to reconsider this stuff, then I'd propose to
a) Use java.util.logging, because it doesn't require any additional
dependencies and is guaranteed to work anywhere.
b) Carefully docum
27 matches
Mail list logo
