Thanks guys.
I have just signed off.
2011/8/1 Simone Tripodi :
> Hi Christian,
> thanks a lot for taking care of it, looks much better of what I reported!!!
> Moreover, if last time we reported late, looks like this time we are
> the first! :D
> Thanks a lot, have a nice evening!!!
> Simo
>
> http
On 8/1/11 11:23 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> svn list https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/tools/releases
>
> compare_dirs.pl grab_releases.sh
> sign_and_hash.shverify_archive_equivalence.sh
> gpg-sign-all multisign.sh
svn list https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/tools/releases
compare_dirs.pl grab_releases.sh
sign_and_hash.shverify_archive_equivalence.sh
gpg-sign-allmultisign.shsymlinks.sh
ve
+1
I additionally used a shell script (kindly provided on Christian
Grobmeier blog[1]) to check signatures and output is OK
Well done!!!
Have a nice day, all the best,
Simo
[1]
http://www.grobmeier.de/checking-md5-and-signatures-with-a-shell-script-29062011.html
$ ./verify.sh
Checking file: ./
+1
Phil
On 8/1/11 10:06 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> The proposed Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.7 release is now available
> for voting.
>
> It can be obtained from:
> http://people.apache.org/~mturk/daemon-1.0.7/
> The svn tag is:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/daemon/tags/COMMONS_DAE
The proposed Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.7 release is now available for voting.
It can be obtained from:
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/daemon-1.0.7/
The svn tag is:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/daemon/tags/COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_7_RC1/
The vote will last for 72 hours or less if en
I made a test with Continuum to deploy an artifact, I didn't expect to
trigger a mass failure of all projects. Sorry for the spam.
Emmanuel Bourg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional comma
On 8/1/11 1:40 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Le 01/08/2011 20:39, Phil Steitz a écrit :
>> On 8/1/11 1:31 AM, luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
>>> Hi Phil,
>>>
>>> - Mail original -
In my own applications, I noticed what appears to be poor
performance in the nextInt(int) met
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10700&projectId=120
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:58:28 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:58:38 +
Total time: 9s
Build Trigger: Sche
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10699&projectId=106
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:57:59 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:58:27 +
Total time: 27s
Build Trigger: Sch
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10698&projectId=129
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:57:49 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:57:56 +
Total time: 7s
Build Trigger: Sche
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10697&projectId=130
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:57:41 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:57:47 +
Total time: 6s
Build Trigger: Sche
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10696&projectId=132
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:57:34 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:57:40 +
Total time: 6s
Build Trigger: Sche
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10695&projectId=101
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:57:11 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:57:33 +
Total time: 22s
Build Trigger: Sch
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10694&projectId=100
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:56:57 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:57:10 +
Total time: 12s
Build Trigger: Sch
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10693&projectId=99
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:56:37 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:56:56 +
Total time: 18s
Build Trigger: Sche
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10692&projectId=119
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:56:16 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:56:36 +
Total time: 20s
Build Trigger: Sch
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10691&projectId=131
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:56:05 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:56:14 +
Total time: 8s
Build Trigger: Sche
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10690&projectId=117
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:55:54 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:56:04 +
Total time: 10s
Build Trigger: Sch
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10689&projectId=107
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:54:36 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:55:53 +
Total time: 1m 17s
Build Trigger:
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10688&projectId=206
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:53:10 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:54:33 +
Total time: 1m 23s
Build Trigger:
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10687&projectId=97
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:51:30 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:53:07 +
Total time: 1m 37s
Build Trigger: S
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10686&projectId=96
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:51:15 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:51:28 +
Total time: 12s
Build Trigger: Sche
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10685&projectId=136
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:50:43 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:51:14 +
Total time: 31s
Build Trigger: Sch
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10684&projectId=116
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:50:31 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:50:42 +
Total time: 10s
Build Trigger: Sch
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10683&projectId=94
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:50:09 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:50:30 +
Total time: 20s
Build Trigger: Sche
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10682&projectId=115
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:49:58 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:50:08 +
Total time: 9s
Build Trigger: Sche
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10681&projectId=84
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:49:47 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:49:57 +
Total time: 10s
Build Trigger: Sche
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10680&projectId=83
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:48:09 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:49:45 +
Total time: 1m 35s
Build Trigger: S
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10679&projectId=82
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:48:00 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:48:08 +
Total time: 8s
Build Trigger: Sched
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10678&projectId=81
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:47:47 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:47:59 +
Total time: 11s
Build Trigger: Sche
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10677&projectId=80
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:46:35 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:47:46 +
Total time: 1m 11s
Build Trigger: S
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10676&projectId=79
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:46:23 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:46:34 +
Total time: 11s
Build Trigger: Sche
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10675&projectId=78
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:46:11 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:46:21 +
Total time: 10s
Build Trigger: Sche
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10674&projectId=76
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:45:55 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:46:11 +
Total time: 15s
Build Trigger: Sche
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10673&projectId=74
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:45:43 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:45:54 +
Total time: 11s
Build Trigger: Sche
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10672&projectId=98
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:38:49 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:45:41 +
Total time: 6m 51s
Build Trigger: S
Hi Phil,
Le 01/08/2011 20:39, Phil Steitz a écrit :
On 8/1/11 1:31 AM, luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Hi Phil,
- Mail original -
In my own applications, I noticed what appears to be poor
performance in the nextInt(int) method of the Mersenne twister,
which I was using to *improve* speed
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10671&projectId=72
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:37:22 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:38:48 +
Total time: 1m 26s
Build Trigger: S
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10670&projectId=64
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:36:39 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:37:18 +
Total time: 39s
Build Trigger: Sche
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10669&projectId=71
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:35:52 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:36:38 +
Total time: 45s
Build Trigger: Sche
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10668&projectId=70
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:35:29 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:35:51 +
Total time: 21s
Build Trigger: Sche
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10667&projectId=69
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:35:16 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:35:28 +
Total time: 11s
Build Trigger: Sche
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10666&projectId=68
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:35:05 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:35:15 +
Total time: 9s
Build Trigger: Sched
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10665&projectId=67
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:34:53 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:35:04 +
Total time: 10s
Build Trigger: Sche
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10664&projectId=65
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:33:39 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:34:51 +
Total time: 1m 12s
Build Trigger: S
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10663&projectId=241
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:33:19 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:33:37 +
Total time: 18s
Build Trigger: Sch
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10662&projectId=75
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:32:55 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 20:33:16 +
Total time: 20s
Build Trigger: Sche
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10659&projectId=95
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 19:59:06 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 19:59:45 +
Total time: 38s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build Numbe
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=10658&projectId=67
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 19:56:30 +
Finished at: Mon 1 Aug 2011 19:56:52 +
Total time: 21s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build Numbe
Le 01/08/2011 21:21, Dennis Lundberg a écrit :
Phil, I have to respectfully disagree here.
What you are saying, and I'm paraphrasing here, is that we need to make
it as difficult as possible for our users to get hold of and use the
latest non-stable version of commons components. We should be m
On 8/1/11 12:21 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2011-08-01 20:19, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 8/1/11 10:16 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>> On Aug 1, 2011, at 10:03 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>>
Le 01/08/2011 18:41, Phil Steitz a écrit :
> On 8/1/11 9:25 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Le 01/08/201
On 2011-08-01 20:19, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 8/1/11 10:16 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>> On Aug 1, 2011, at 10:03 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>
>>> Le 01/08/2011 18:41, Phil Steitz a écrit :
On 8/1/11 9:25 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 01/08/2011 17:57, Ralph Goers a écrit :
>> These will ju
On 8/1/11 1:31 AM, luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> - Mail original -
>> In my own applications, I noticed what appears to be poor
>> performance in the nextInt(int) method of the Mersenne twister,
>> which I was using to *improve* speed. I think that for small n, the
>> default
+1
>
> I really prefer a CI-triggered publishing. I see no values in producing a
> "nightly" if nothing has been changed.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@comm
Hi Christian,
thanks a lot for taking care of it, looks much better of what I reported!!!
Moreover, if last time we reported late, looks like this time we are
the first! :D
Thanks a lot, have a nice evening!!!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Aug 1, 2
On 8/1/11 10:16 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> On Aug 1, 2011, at 10:03 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>
>> Le 01/08/2011 18:41, Phil Steitz a écrit :
>>> On 8/1/11 9:25 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 01/08/2011 17:57, Ralph Goers a écrit :
> These will just be new SNAPSHOTs so deploying a new one every
+1 - having it in a maven repo all ready for consumption hopefully increases
the motivation for testing.
If using a nexus repo it can tidy out stale instances.
The snapshot and release repos will be under distinct addresses anyway - so
it requires the consumer to actively configure this anyway...
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2011-08-01, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
>> Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
>> [snip]
>
>>> [1] Once I manage to set finalize the account creation process at the
>>> bug database, that is. Do they really think I'd give them my business
>>> phone number and street address in order
On Aug 1, 2011, at 10:03 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 01/08/2011 18:41, Phil Steitz a écrit :
>> On 8/1/11 9:25 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>>> Le 01/08/2011 17:57, Ralph Goers a écrit :
These will just be new SNAPSHOTs so deploying a new one every
evening regardless of whether it has ch
Le 01/08/2011 18:41, Phil Steitz a écrit :
On 8/1/11 9:25 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 01/08/2011 17:57, Ralph Goers a écrit :
These will just be new SNAPSHOTs so deploying a new one every
evening regardless of whether it has changed should be no big
deal. SNAPSHOTs without a timestamp overwrit
On 2011-08-01, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> [snip]
>> [1] Once I manage to set finalize the account creation process at the
>> bug database, that is. Do they really think I'd give them my business
>> phone number and street address in order to report a bug?
> I always do:
> +
My view is 100% the opposite. We should provide only snapshot jars and if they
want the source they should get it from SVN. This is for two reasons - a)
deploying snapshots is easy and b) this is not a release.
Ralph
On Aug 1, 2011, at 9:41 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 8/1/11 9:25 AM, Emmanuel
On 8/1/11 9:25 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 01/08/2011 17:57, Ralph Goers a écrit :
>> These will just be new SNAPSHOTs so deploying a new one every
>> evening regardless of whether it has changed should be no big
>> deal. SNAPSHOTs without a timestamp overwrite a previous one
>> while timestampe
Le 01/08/2011 17:57, Ralph Goers a écrit :
These will just be new SNAPSHOTs so deploying a new one every evening
regardless of whether it has changed should be no big deal. SNAPSHOTs without a
timestamp overwrite a previous one while timestamped SNAPSHOTs should be
cleaned up automatically by
These will just be new SNAPSHOTs so deploying a new one every evening
regardless of whether it has changed should be no big deal. SNAPSHOTs without a
timestamp overwrite a previous one while timestamped SNAPSHOTs should be
cleaned up automatically by Nexus.
Ralph
On Aug 1, 2011, at 8:45 AM, Em
Le 01/08/2011 17:38, Jörg Schaible a écrit :
I really prefer a CI-triggered publishing. I see no values in producing a
"nightly" if nothing has been changed.
Either nightly or trigger by commit builds are fine as long as it's
automated.
Emmanuel Bourg
--
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
[snip]
> [1] Once I manage to set finalize the account creation process at the
> bug database, that is. Do they really think I'd give them my business
> phone number and street address in order to report a bug?
I always do:
+00042-4200420042
42/0 Lunar City, Moon
SCNR :
Hi Simo,
I added it as you said. Please let me know if I stripped off to much
or if you have other objections. Otherwise we have done our duty ;-)
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2011
Cheers
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Christian!!!
> agreed. I reported too
Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 8/1/11 2:19 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Once upon a time, in an era of pioneers, we had nightly builds
>> producing fresh jars available to heroic developers interested in
>> testing the latest features committed to our projects.
>>
>> As I understand now the
The implication to that is that if you piggyback on a Jenkins or Continuum
instance that is already publishing artifacts then you don't need a new
account. If you want to use a CI system that isn't already set up then you
will need to get one for that CI system to use.
Ralph
On Aug 1, 2011, a
Le 01/08/2011 16:57, Phil Steitz a écrit :
+1 for making nightlies available again. I think Continuum actually
produces the artifacts already and all we need to do is find a way
to make them publicly available. Several years back when the old
set up died, it was because the script that we were
Hi Christian!!!
agreed. I reported too quickly and didn't pay enough attention on
discriminating what we previously reported - and what I should have
put out from the c'n'p :P
Feel free to modify the report according to your latest observations!!!
Thanks for taking care of it, very appreciated!
Hav
On 8/1/11 2:19 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Once upon a time, in an era of pioneers, we had nightly builds
> producing fresh jars available to heroic developers interested in
> testing the latest features committed to our projects.
>
> As I understand now there is no equivalent process.
- Mail original -
>
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
> Envoyé : jeudi 28 juillet 2011 18:32
> À : Commons Developers List
> Objet : Re: [math] Adding a new class to handle Matrix with 3
> columns/rows
>
>
> >> The key point here is that the
Hi,
I've checked current trunk's ZipArchiveInputStream and
ZipArchiveOutputStream implementations against InfoZIP's zip (Cygwin in
this case), 7ZIP, windows Compressed Folders and Oracle's final Java7
JDK's jar command - all on Windows 7.
For InputStream I've created an archive with a single comp
Hi Simo,
thanks for doing that report again. Just wanted to submit, but have a
question (to all).
> * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> towards graduation.
>
> - make at least a big release that shows to Commons PMC the
> compliancy level of OGNL to Commons poli
+1 for uploading snapshots
AFAIK jobs on Continuum are already set up for every commons
component, so we should "just" properly configure the artifacts
deploy...
All the best,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Ralph Goers wrote
Hi all guys,
follows below my report, it contains part copied from July since they
didn't accept we reported after the deadline. Mentors: please sign and
paste on Wiki! :P
TIA, all the best and have a nice day!!!
Simo
OGNL
Apache OGNL is a Java development framework for Object-Graph
Navigation La
Dear OGNL Developers,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 17 August 2011, 10 am Pacific. The
report
for your podli
I believe other projects are doing this with Jenkins so I see no reason we
couldn't also.
Ralph
On Aug 1, 2011, at 2:19 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Once upon a time, in an era of pioneers, we had nightly builds producing
> fresh jars available to heroic developers interested in te
-Message d'origine-
De : Phil Steitz [mailto:phil.ste...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 28 juillet 2011 18:32
À : Commons Developers List
Objet : Re: [math] Adding a new class to handle Matrix with 3 columns/rows
>> The key point here is that the matrix from linear package are not
>> comp
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project jakarta-turbine-jcs has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Hi all,
Once upon a time, in an era of pioneers, we had nightly builds producing
fresh jars available to heroic developers interested in testing the
latest features committed to our projects.
As I understand now there is no equivalent process. There is a snapshot
repository for Maven artifac
Hi Phil,
- Mail original -
> In my own applications, I noticed what appears to be poor
> performance in the nextInt(int) method of the Mersenne twister,
> which I was using to *improve* speed. I think that for small n, the
> default implementation in BistreamGenerator may be running too m
On 2011-08-01, Gump wrote:
> [javac] Compiling 265 source files to
> /srv/gump/public/workspace/apache-commons/jcs/build
> [javac]
> /srv/gump/public/workspace/apache-commons/jcs/src/java/org/apache/jcs/admin/servlet/JCSAdminServlet.java:30:
> package org.apache.velocity.tools.view does
87 matches
Mail list logo
