To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
This is half a dozen related votes in one thread (for convenience), namely:
1. Accept BCEL [1] as Commons component
1a. Grant Commons karma to Dave Brosius (dbrosius)
2. Accept JCS [2] as Commons component
2a. Grant Commons karma to Aaron Smuts (asmuts)
2b. Grant Commons karma to Thomas Vandahl (
On 6/25/11 4:28 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 17/06/2011 09:02, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 17/06/2011 00:32, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> I think 2.0 is the opportunity to do this right. Almost like we were
>>> designing this from scratch.
>>>
>>> Making the factory an invariant of the pool sounds good.
>>>
On 17/06/2011 09:02, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 17/06/2011 00:32, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> I think 2.0 is the opportunity to do this right. Almost like we were
>> designing this from scratch.
>>
>> Making the factory an invariant of the pool sounds good.
>>
>> Otoh If a setFactory method exists it shoul
I think there are some naming conventions. Try using Abstract in the name
(there are other examples in our tests base) so that gump doesn't attempt to
run it directly.
--
Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.
Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
Hello.
Thanks to Dennis, t
Hello.
Thanks to Dennis, the "BaseSecantSolverTest" is an elegant solution for
testing its subclass with the least amount of duplicate code. However, it
doesn't work on the automatic build machine (gump)...
On my machine, it seems to work as expected: The "BaseSecantSolverTest"
class itself is not
10GB will definitely be fine (and will fit into memory on many modern
machines!).
Somewhere north of a design matrix of 1TB, you will be breaking new ground,
mostly in terms of how well your basic algorithm works. The LSMR should
still work, but size does matter, often in surprising ways.
On Fri
So, where do I post/comment about this really interesting project?
Best,
AlexP
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi James,
> good point, I agree. Feel free to play with the codebase - it is in a
> decent form in the way that people can be able to extend/modify it -
> a
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
