Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Validator 1.4 beta 1 based on RC1

2011-06-01 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi Nick, I do not know enough about this code base to vote on it, but I noticed the following building with Maven: [warn] [XHTML Sink] Modified invalid anchor name: 'Changes Report' to 'Changes_Report' [warn] [XHTML Sink] Modified invalid anchor name: 'Release History' to 'Release_History' [INFO

Re: [discovery]: workaround for openjdk javac bug.

2011-06-01 Thread Simone Tripodi
OK, patch applied, please read my comment on jira issue. Thanks! :) http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:57 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > ouch sorry just noticed you already did it!!! > going to review it, I'll let you know, stay tuned! > Simo

Re: [discovery]: workaround for openjdk javac bug.

2011-06-01 Thread Simone Tripodi
ouch sorry just noticed you already did it!!! going to review it, I'll let you know, stay tuned! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi Denis, > very nice to meet you and thanks a lot for your kind help!!!

Re: [discovery]: workaround for openjdk javac bug.

2011-06-01 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Denis, very nice to meet you and thanks a lot for your kind help!!! Anyway I need to ask you to fill a patch on our JIRA[1] and attach the issue, granting the ASF using the code in the patch. After that I'll be really pleased to apply your patch! Many thanks in advance, have a nice day! Simo [1

[discovery]: workaround for openjdk javac bug.

2011-06-01 Thread Denis Lila
Hi. My name is Denis. I am an openjdk developer at Red Hat. This bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706066 was filed a few days ago and it shows that discovery is not buildable with openjdk6's javac. I found a fix for this (which you can find on the bug comments) but such compiler ch

Re: [DIGESTER][SANDBOX] back proposing the Digester3 merge to trunk

2011-06-01 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Rahul! thanks for your kind feedback :) I'm going to plug the clirr plugin and redeploy the site so we can have a better overview about what changed. The last point is indeed very important for users, the first attempt broke that kind of compatibility that maybe was too rude :P I'll let you know

Re: [DIGESTER][SANDBOX] back proposing the Digester3 merge to trunk

2011-06-01 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi Rahul :) > thanks for following up! > > I can confirm they're NOT binary compatible even without running > clirr, because of the following reasons: > We'll need to analyze with clirr anyway, minimally to produce good release notes and 2.

Incubator PMC/Board report for June 2011 (dev@commons.apache.org)

2011-06-01 Thread no-reply
Dear OGNL Developers, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly board report. The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 15 June 2011, 10 am Pacific. The report for your podling

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-06-01 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [DIGESTER][SANDBOX] back proposing the Digester3 merge to trunk

2011-06-01 Thread Simone Tripodi
I just terminated to fix javadoc violations and re-uploaded the site, quality is now even better thatn the /trunk's :P Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi Rahul :) > thanks for following up! > > I can c