Re: [DIGESTER][SANDBOX] back proposing the Digester3 merge to trunk

2011-05-31 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Rahul :) thanks for following up! I can confirm they're NOT binary compatible even without running clirr, because of the following reasons: - deprecated APIs don't exist anymore; - internals of annotations/xml modules have been rewritten as EDSL extensions; - some Digester methods changed s

[VOTE] Release Commons Validator 1.4 beta 1 based on RC1

2011-05-31 Thread Nick Burch
Hi All Following last week's discussions, I've rolled a RC for Commons Validator 1.4 beta 1. The idea of this release is to get some wider testing of the codebase, owing to the 4.5 year gap since 1.3.1, before we hopefully release 1.4 in a few weeks time. (We believe the code is stable and r

Re: svn commit: r1128371 - in /commons/proper/validator/trunk: pom.xml redirect.pom

2011-05-31 Thread Nick Burch
On Sat, 28 May 2011, sebb wrote: So IMO if we want to change the groupid or make small incompatible changes it would be OK. Changing the groupId without changing the package name can result in two copies of the library on the classpath, which is much harder to debug than a binary API change. I

Re: [DIGESTER][SANDBOX] back proposing the Digester3 merge to trunk

2011-05-31 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > New site is online, does someone have some spare time to check[1] and > provide feedbacks about the merge proposal? Don't have much time, but if its now compatible with 2.x thats a good thing :-) You may want to confirm using a clirr or eq

Re: [OGNL] the opensymphony.com website is no more active

2011-05-31 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
Hi Simone, I have just realized that it looks like the ognl site contains the old doc reference Maurizio Cucchiara Il giorno 31/mag/2011 23.58, "Simone Tripodi" ha scritto: > Hi Maurizio!!! > already done! If you generate the site[1], you can see both > language/developer guide :) > Fortunately

Re: [OGNL] the opensymphony.com website is no more active

2011-05-31 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Maurizio!!! already done! If you generate the site[1], you can see both language/developer guide :) Fortunately we had the XML docbook in the initial codebase to copy :P Feel free anyway to improve it! Thanks and all the best! Simo [1] mvn site && open target/site/index.html http://people.apac

[OGNL] the opensymphony.com website is no more active

2011-05-31 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
Hi guys, FYI the OS.com website shut down, at the moment I'm writing there is no way to access to the old OGNL website/docs. IMHO we should consider to copy the old docs in the new maven generate site, before that everything get lost definitively. What do you think about? [1] http://www.opensympho

Re: [DIGESTER][SANDBOX] back proposing the Digester3 merge to trunk

2011-05-31 Thread Simone Tripodi
New site is online, does someone have some spare time to check[1] and provide feedbacks about the merge proposal? Thanks in advance, have a nice day!!! Simo [1] http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/digester3/ http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, May 31, 2011 at

[OGNL] private@ subscription

2011-05-31 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all OGNL PPMC, please subscribe to ognl-private@, sending en empty email to ognl-private-subscribe@i.a.o it is enough. Looking forward to meet you there! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ - T

[DIGESTER][SANDBOX] back proposing the Digester3 merge to trunk

2011-05-31 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys, after some day of work on Sandbox, I'm back to propose once again the merge of my work in proper /trunk. Failing my first attempt was good, because I had the opportunity to learn a lot and this time the proposal is much better :P What I did: - moved the current sandbox in a separate

Re: [math] Wilcoxon Signed Rank - Why return the maximum W?

2011-05-31 Thread Phil Steitz
On 5/30/11 2:54 PM, Nathanael Costa wrote: > Hi, > > I downloaded the version 3.0 and I noted that the Wilcoxon Signed Rank > returns the maximum W. But anywhere I read about this test says that > the minimum W should be returned. Am I missing something? > > Another question is why do not ignore th

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-05-31 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This