On 26 May 2011 14:46, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 9:24 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 23 May 2011 16:22, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:16 AM, sebb wrote:
SCXML has had a couple of ongoing Gump failures, which I started to
look at again.
>>>
>>> Than
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 9:24 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 23 May 2011 16:22, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:16 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> SCXML has had a couple of ongoing Gump failures, which I started to
>>> look at again.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks, the initial breakage was from EL trunk changes, i
On 23 May 2011 16:22, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:16 AM, sebb wrote:
>> SCXML has had a couple of ongoing Gump failures, which I started to
>> look at again.
>>
>
>
> Thanks, the initial breakage was from EL trunk changes, if you follow
> this trail (if you've begun to look
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
