Hi Phil!
I think that having the default one would be really nice so we can
push the site without the logo "hole".
Anyway I'd like to create something different and simple at the same
time, something like DIgester3[1] logo that a friend of mine gave me
as a present.
WDYT?
Simo
[1] http://commons.a
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On 20 May 2011 21:04, Phil Steitz wrote:
> This code in BigFraction.add looks dangerous to me:
>
> if (ZERO.equals(fraction)) {
> return this;
> }
>
> subtract has similar code and some other methods return the static
> BigFraction.ZERO.
>
> While BigFractions are Immutable, this coul
This code in BigFraction.add looks dangerous to me:
if (ZERO.equals(fraction)) {
return this;
}
subtract has similar code and some other methods return the static
BigFraction.ZERO.
While BigFractions are Immutable, this could cause problems for
applications that are expecting new i
There is no set policy, but Jorg is right that pretty much all use
the same Gimp-generated "logos" other than [math]. Personally, I
like the simple, "text-only" logos and the uniformity (which fits
with the simple, descriptive names), though I am not going to
complain if [ognl] or another componen
On 5/19/11 2:21 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 19 May 2011 06:34, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 5/18/11 9:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>> The following rule seems unnecessary to me:
>>>
>>> http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsEtiquette#Commons_Etiquette
>>>
>>> "each committer who commits to a component must
On 5/19/11 6:29 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>
>> On 05/19/11 06:34, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 5/18/11 9:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
The following rule seems unnecessary to me:
> +1
>
> It should not be a rule.
>
> Does anyone know M
Le 20/05/2011 02:47, Konstantin Kolinko a écrit :
2011/5/20 Gilles Sadowski:
Hello.
following our previous discussions, I'm ready to commit some code regarding
iterative linear solvers. I've read through the Apache web pages on the
subject, but I still have some very silly questions (I do apol
Ouch,
just noticed contests are for money, there's not the chance to get it
for volunteering (and Lucene.net is buying his one for $695) at least
from this site :/
Going to ask somewhere else, I'll let you know,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, May 20
:)
Thanks for you feedback Henri, I'm going to open a context!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> I don't see an issue. Reality is that we generally just couldn't come
> up with good logos back in year do
11 matches
Mail list logo
