[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-05-07 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-05-07 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbcp (in module commons-dbcp-1.x) failed

2011-05-07 Thread Phil Steitz
Ugh. Forgot the jta dependency. Hopefully fixed now. Phil On 5/8/11 1:03 AM, Gump wrote: > To whom it may engage... > > This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For > more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, > and/or contact the folk at gene.

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-dbcp (in module commons-dbcp-1.x) failed

2011-05-07 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[math] make org.apache.commons.math.linear.FieldVector iterable

2011-05-07 Thread Arne Ploese
Hi, it would be handy to simply iterate over the elements of the vector... Arne - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [all][proposal] Extend Dormant to include no longer active released components

2011-05-07 Thread Phil Steitz
On 5/5/11 1:26 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> As Hen has pointed out a couple of times, we have quite a few >> Commons proper components that are no longer under active >> development. I would like to propose that we extend the "dormant" >> classi