To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:40 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 5 May 2011 20:21, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:04 PM, sebb wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 5 May 2011 19:39, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> >> > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:42 PM, sebb wr
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
YES you're absolutely right!!! :)
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 5/5/11 1:13 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> I wonder if any developer has the need to use JOCL today, given the
>> configuration
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:34 AM, sebb wrote:
> I normally send a separate e-mail to announce @ a.o alone. [Might be
> worth separating dev and user announces too.]
>
> This makes it slightly easier to track the bounces (which don't always
> reference the original e-mail) as well as reducing the re
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> As Hen has pointed out a couple of times, we have quite a few
> Commons proper components that are no longer under active
> development. I would like to propose that we extend the "dormant"
> classification on the web site to include components
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:40 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 5 May 2011 20:21, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:04 PM, sebb wrote:
> >
> >> On 5 May 2011 19:39, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >> > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:42 PM, sebb wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 4 May 2011 16:28, Gary Gregory wrote:
On 5/5/11 1:13 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> +1
>
> I wonder if any developer has the need to use JOCL today, given the
> configuration super-power provided by modern IoC containers/DI
> frameworks
Or even Commons Digester which IIRC, this stuff preceded.
Phil
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripo
+1
I wonder if any developer has the need to use JOCL today, given the
configuration super-power provided by modern IoC containers/DI
frameworks
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 5/5/11 10:26 AM, Emmanuel Bo
sounds reasonable, +1
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> As Hen has pointed out a couple of times, we have quite a few
> Commons proper components that are no longer under active
> development. I would like
On 5 May 2011 20:21, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:04 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 5 May 2011 19:39, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:42 PM, sebb wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 4 May 2011 16:28, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> >> > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:46 AM, sebb wrote:
>> >> >
As Hen has pointed out a couple of times, we have quite a few
Commons proper components that are no longer under active
development. I would like to propose that we extend the "dormant"
classification on the web site to include components that have had
releases. I am not sure whether we need to d
Hi all,
looks like I've been causing too much flares! :D
I understand your concerns, anyway, as in the subject, I just proposed
a *2.0-beta1* release, as a first - of many, maybe - intermediate step
before pushing the 2.0.
We could even downgrade it to alpha1, and warning users that APIs can
appea
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:04 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 5 May 2011 19:39, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:42 PM, sebb wrote:
> >
> >> On 4 May 2011 16:28, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >> > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:46 AM, sebb wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 4 May 2011 06:01, Gary Gregory wrote:
On 5 May 2011 19:39, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:42 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 4 May 2011 16:28, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:46 AM, sebb wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 4 May 2011 06:01, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> >> > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:36 PM, sebb wrote:
>> >>
On 5/5/11 10:26 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 05/05/2011 19:09, Mark Thomas a écrit :
>> I couldn't find much evidence (via Google) of JOCL being in
>> current or
>> recent usage therefore I'd like to drop it from DBCP 2.0.0 onwards.
>>
>> Any objections?
>
> Never heard of JOCL, is this the xml s
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:42 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 4 May 2011 16:28, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:46 AM, sebb wrote:
> >
> >> On 4 May 2011 06:01, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >> > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:36 PM, sebb wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 4 May 2011 03:42, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I couldn't find much evidence (via Google) of JOCL being in current or
> recent usage therefore I'd like to drop it from DBCP 2.0.0 onwards.
>
> Any objections?
>
Do it! :)
Gary
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> ---
On 5/5/11 10:12 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> On 5/5/11 9:20 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> I would like to propose an aggressive release schedule:
>>>
>>> - Push 2.0 out as a generified version of 1.5 ASAP and add/remove/fiddle
>>> nothing else. "
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=8004&projectId=73
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Thu 5 May 2011 18:22:11 +
Finished at: Thu 5 May 2011 18:22:25 +
Total time: 13s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
On 5/5/11 10:27 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 05/05/2011 18:21, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 5/5/11 9:42 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 05/05/2011 17:33, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 5/5/11 9:20 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I would like to propose an aggressive release schedule:
>
> - Push 2.0 out
On 05/05/2011 18:21, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 5/5/11 9:42 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 05/05/2011 17:33, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 5/5/11 9:20 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
I would like to propose an aggressive release schedule:
- Push 2.0 out as a generified version of 1.5 ASAP and add/rem
Le 05/05/2011 19:09, Mark Thomas a écrit :
I couldn't find much evidence (via Google) of JOCL being in current or
recent usage therefore I'd like to drop it from DBCP 2.0.0 onwards.
Any objections?
Never heard of JOCL, is this the xml serialization format that was
introduced in Java 1.4 (with
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=8002&projectId=73
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Thu 5 May 2011 17:23:04 +
Finished at: Thu 5 May 2011 17:23:19 +
Total time: 14s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Numb
On 5/5/11 10:09 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I couldn't find much evidence (via Google) of JOCL being in current or
> recent usage therefore I'd like to drop it from DBCP 2.0.0 onwards.
> Any objections?
Not from me.
Phil
> Mark
>
>
>
> -
On 5/5/11 9:42 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 05/05/2011 17:33, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 5/5/11 9:20 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> I would like to propose an aggressive release schedule:
>>>
>>> - Push 2.0 out as a generified version of 1.5 ASAP and add/remove/fiddle
>>> nothing else. "Just give me the
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 5/5/11 9:20 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > I would like to propose an aggressive release schedule:
> >
> > - Push 2.0 out as a generified version of 1.5 ASAP and add/remove/fiddle
> > nothing else. "Just give me the generics P L E A S E!" :) C
I couldn't find much evidence (via Google) of JOCL being in current or
recent usage therefore I'd like to drop it from DBCP 2.0.0 onwards.
Any objections?
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For a
On 05/05/2011 17:33, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 5/5/11 9:20 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> I would like to propose an aggressive release schedule:
>>
>> - Push 2.0 out as a generified version of 1.5 ASAP and add/remove/fiddle
>> nothing else. "Just give me the generics P L E A S E!" :) Change deprecated
>
On 5/5/11 9:20 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I would like to propose an aggressive release schedule:
>
> - Push 2.0 out as a generified version of 1.5 ASAP and add/remove/fiddle
> nothing else. "Just give me the generics P L E A S E!" :) Change deprecated
> documentation from "Will be removed in 2.0" t
On 5/5/11 8:54 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> some of us (me included :P) are waiting for pool with generics; now
> that the migration has been done, WDYT about releasing a beta1
> release?
> It is basically the latest pool-1.5.X API, but with generics, at least
> we can start playing w
I would like to propose an aggressive release schedule:
- Push 2.0 out as a generified version of 1.5 ASAP and add/remove/fiddle
nothing else. "Just give me the generics P L E A S E!" :) Change deprecated
documentation from "Will be removed in 2.0" to "Will be removed in 3.0".
- Next is 3.0: This
Hi all guys,
some of us (me included :P) are waiting for pool with generics; now
that the migration has been done, WDYT about releasing a beta1
release?
It is basically the latest pool-1.5.X API, but with generics, at least
we can start playing with it.
Thoughts? Just let me know, I can take care o
I normally send a separate e-mail to announce @ a.o alone. [Might be
worth separating dev and user announces too.]
This makes it slightly easier to track the bounces (which don't always
reference the original e-mail) as well as reducing the reply-all
scatter.
On 5 May 2011 15:27, Simone Tripodi
agreed, thanks for pointing it! :)
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> Congratulations to Simone for pushing this release out!
>>
>
>
> +1 to that se
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Congratulations to Simone for pushing this release out!
>
+1 to that sentiment, but not to using reply all and having things
like announce@ on CC (even if it bounces :-).
-Rahul
> Gary
>
> On May 5, 2011, at 8:26, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>
Thank you Gary for the help!!!
And a big "thank you!" goes also to Phil Steiz and Brian Demers,
without them it would have been hard!
Habe a nice day!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Congratulations to S
Congratulations to Simone for pushing this release out!
Gary
On May 5, 2011, at 8:26, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the
> commons-discovery-0.5 release!
>
> The Apache Commons Discovery component is about discovering, or finding,
> implementations for p
The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the
commons-discovery-0.5 release!
The Apache Commons Discovery component is about discovering, or finding,
implementations for pluggable interfaces.
Changes in this version include:
Fixed Bugs:
o Enumeration in Service class is broken. Issue: D
Hi Joerg,
yesterday in the night (my localtime) I joined the #asfinfra IRC
channel and bugged Brian Demers, he noticed that discovery was not
setup to synch; he just restored the synchronization and it should
have been synchronized later.
I haven't had the time to check, that's because I didn't rep
Hi Simone,
Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Salut Emmanuel,
> do you have any news? Many thanks in advance, have a nice day!!!
> a bientot!!!
It *is* synced (http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/commons-discovery/commons-
discovery/0.5/commons-discovery-0.5.jar), why do you think it is not? Is it
because you c
43 matches
Mail list logo
