To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue af
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> No objections from me. Please dive right in.
>
Done.
Gary
>
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> > Hi All:
> >
> > Any objections to adding test jar generation to the POM for the next RC?
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Gary
No objections from me. Please dive right in.
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> Any objections to adding test jar generation to the POM for the next RC?
>
> Thank you,
> Gary
>
> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
> http://garygregory.com/
> http://people.apache.org/
On 4 May 2011 16:28, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:46 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 4 May 2011 06:01, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:36 PM, sebb wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 4 May 2011 03:42, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> >> > Now that I've can see my monitor clearly (no more f
Thanks for the explanation Gary, very appreciated!!!
Have a nice day,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> The immediate use I have is to be able to run the unit tests for a given
> component as part of the b
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Stephen Colebourne >wrote:
> >
> >> On 4 May 2011 17:58, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >> > I think we still have naming problems with the Pair class reflecte
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Stephen Colebourne
> wrote:
>
>> On 4 May 2011 17:58, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > I think we still have naming problems with the Pair class reflected in
>> this
>> > Javadoc fragment:
>> >
>> > * @param the fir
The immediate use I have is to be able to run the unit tests for a given
component as part of the build for my product. For commons-lang and most
commons projects, this is a low cost item time-wise.
I want to know that the commons-foo jar will run on our build
configurations, with our OSs, JVMs, l
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> On 4 May 2011 17:58, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > I think we still have naming problems with the Pair class reflected in
> this
> > Javadoc fragment:
> >
> > * @param the first element type
> > * @param the second element type
> >
> > Eit
Hey,
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> I think we still have naming problems with the Pair class reflected in this
> Javadoc fragment:
>
> * @param the first element type
> * @param the second element type
>
> Either we call them L left and R right, or we call
On 4 May 2011 17:58, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I think we still have naming problems with the Pair class reflected in this
> Javadoc fragment:
>
> * @param the first element type
> * @param the second element type
>
> Either we call them L left and R right, or we call them F first and S
> second,
Hi All:
I think we still have naming problems with the Pair class reflected in this
Javadoc fragment:
* @param the first element type
* @param the second element type
Either we call them L left and R right, or we call them F first and S
second, but mixing both is not good IMO.
My preference
On 5/3/11 1:06 AM, Nick Burch wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Nick Burch wrote:
>> On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Nick Burch wrote:
>>> At the moment, the Email Validator considers @localhost email
>>> addresses to be invalid, due to the Domain Validator not
>>> considering it to be valid.
>>>
>>> Initially I t
I don't see any blocking issue.
Can I you explain me please how this artifact can be reused? It's just
a matter of filling a lack in my knowledge, many thanks in advance!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
On 4 May 2011 16:23, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Ah, well, it would make it easier to port my current code: create subclasses
> with the desired formatting and replace package names. Each subclass would
> call toString(format) and that's it. The alternative is to either call
> toString(format) from the
Hi All:
Any objections to adding test jar generation to the POM for the next RC?
Thank you,
Gary
http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
http://garygregory.com/
http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:46 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 4 May 2011 06:01, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:36 PM, sebb wrote:
> >
> >> On 4 May 2011 03:42, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >> > Now that I've can see my monitor clearly (no more fever!), I
> understand
> >> why
> >> > this did no
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> > On May 4, 2011, at 8:36, Matt Benson wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Stephen Colebourne <
> scolebou...@joda.org> wrote:
> >>> (review now back from holiday)
> >>>
> >
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On May 4, 2011, at 8:36, Matt Benson wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Stephen Colebourne
>> wrote:
>>> (review now back from holiday)
>>>
>>> -1
>> [SNIP]
>>> I'm still looking for ImmutablePair to be final too, but perhaps I
>>>
On May 4, 2011, at 9:02, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> On 4 May 2011 13:47, Matt Benson wrote:
>> At some point Hen mentioned the idea of a PairFormat class. I don't
>> think this is a bad idea, but the parsing capabilities of such a beast
>> would be minimal to nonexistent, and it still doesn't
On May 4, 2011, at 8:36, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Stephen Colebourne
> wrote:
>> (review now back from holiday)
>>
>> -1
> [SNIP]
>> I'm still looking for ImmutablePair to be final too, but perhaps I
>> missed the conclusion of that debate... (NOT DONE in SVN)
>>
>
>
On 4 May 2011 13:47, Matt Benson wrote:
> At some point Hen mentioned the idea of a PairFormat class. I don't
> think this is a bad idea, but the parsing capabilities of such a beast
> would be minimal to nonexistent, and it still doesn't seem that it
> would be configurable in a simple way witho
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 6:24 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> So
>
> While I can see the benefits of toString(String format), I'm
> struggling to understand what formatTo(...) gains Pair.
>
> I've added a test (in svn), and removed the Formattable interface from
> Pair (not in svn), and get the
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> (review now back from holiday)
>
> -1
[SNIP]
> I'm still looking for ImmutablePair to be final too, but perhaps I
> missed the conclusion of that debate... (NOT DONE in SVN)
>
Gary, now that you have toString(format) back, can you functi
On 4 May 2011 13:10, sebb wrote:
>> /**
>> - * {@link FormattableUtils} instances should NOT be constructed in
>> + * {@code FormattableUtils} instances should NOT be constructed in
>
> What's wrong with @link here?
In general, it is not advisable to use @link in the first sentence of
On 4 May 2011 12:22, wrote:
> Author: scolebourne
> Date: Wed May 4 11:22:29 2011
> New Revision: 1099416
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1099416&view=rev
> Log:
> Javadoc
>
> Modified:
>
> commons/proper/lang/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/text/FormattableUtils.java
So
While I can see the benefits of toString(String format), I'm
struggling to understand what formatTo(...) gains Pair.
I've added a test (in svn), and removed the Formattable interface from
Pair (not in svn), and get the same output, so implementing
Formattable appears to be pointless to me.
On 4 May 2011 12:11, sebb wrote:
> On 29 April 2011 07:47, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
>>
>> RC3 is available here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC3/
>>
>> Maven artifacts:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-
On 29 April 2011 07:47, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
>
> RC3 is available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC3/
>
> Maven artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC3/maven/
>
> Website:
>
> http://peopl
On 4 May 2011 11:48, karnakar t wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am using Tomhawk 2.0 for JSF 2.0 for file uploading.
Please subscribe to the Commons User list and ask there.
Also, please do not attach files (they are often stripped).
Save them somewhere public (e.g. pastebin) and include a link.
And do
On 4 May 2011 11:42, karnakar t wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I am using Tomhawk 2.0 for JSF 2.0 for file uploading.
>
>
>
> Am able to upload video ,image files(all types of files other than audio
> files)
>
>
>
> But am not able to upload some files like mp3 and some other audio files.
Please subscribe
Hi,
I am using Tomhawk 2.0 for JSF 2.0 for file uploading.
Am able to upload video ,image files(all types of files other than audio
files)
But am not able to upload some files like mp3 and some other audio files.
Let me know Tomhawk or apache-commo- file upload support all type of mime
On 4 May 2011 06:01, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 11:36 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 4 May 2011 03:42, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > Now that I've can see my monitor clearly (no more fever!), I understand
>> why
>> > this did not work.
>> >
>> > Running a standard test build for [lang] as
Hi,
I am using Tomhawk 2.0 for JSF 2.0 for file uploading.
Am able to upload video ,image files(all types of files other than audio
files)
But am not able to upload some files like mp3 and some other audio files.
Let me know Tomhawk or apache-commo- file upload support all type of mime
(review now back from holiday)
-1
I'm unhappy with the change in FastDateFormat from new
GregorianCalendar() to Calendar.getInstance(). This will pick up
alternate calendar systems based on the default locale, and probably
mess up the rest of the code which I expect relies on it being
gregorian.
37 matches
Mail list logo
