Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
RC3 is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC3/
Maven artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC3/maven/
Website:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC3/site/
Note that there
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> These are the current blocking items in play afaik:
>>
>> * Email thread - what else should implement Formattable?
>
> Sounds like this is now:
>
> * Update javadoc for Mutable classe
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Need to get the md5's restored before I can vote on this.
One other thing that I am not sure about is the content of the
maven-metadata.xml file. It lists only the new release. I remember
us getting some backlash a year or so ago when we released something
with metadata like that, since it appar
+1.
Note that src/conf/* can be excluded if the Ant build is not included
in the src distro.
Hen
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys!
> After the failed RC1, I'm here to propose a new Apache
> Commons-DIscovery release, based on RC2, please cast your votes!
> M
On 20/04/2011, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> Is Pair now good (for a value of consensually agreed good)?
>
> Good enough, although Stephen noted in ImmutablePair's javadoc that
> being non-final, a subclass could add
> undesirable/counter-to-expecta
Thanks a lot for your feedback Joerg, very appreciated!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Simone,
>
> Simone Tripodi wrote:
>
>> Hi all guys,
>> during the first attemp of pool2 we agreed on changing
Hi Simone,
Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys!
> After the failed RC1, I'm here to propose a new Apache
> Commons-DIscovery release, based on RC2, please cast your votes!
> Many thanks in advance to everybody will take part to the vote process :)
> All the best,
> Simo
>
> Release notes:
>
> h
Sure. I've gone ahead and subscribed.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi Hen,
> I think that we should move this discussion on general@incubator, or not?
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:41 PM,
Hi Simone,
Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> during the first attemp of pool2 we agreed on changing the groupId to
> `org.apache.commons`, do you agree on restore this groupId?
> Just let me know, many thanks in advance,
Since the package name has been changed, we agreed IIRC to adjust the
Hi all guys,
during the first attemp of pool2 we agreed on changing the groupId to
`org.apache.commons`, do you agree on restore this groupId?
Just let me know, many thanks in advance,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
---
Hi Phil,
sorry I overlooked the fact that the issue key is incomplete, apologizes :(
Going to apply your suggestions, thanks for reviewing!!!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 4/28/11 7:43 AM, simonetri
On 4/28/11 7:43 AM, simonetrip...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: simonetripodi
> Date: Thu Apr 28 14:43:18 2011
> New Revision: 1097486
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1097486&view=rev
> Log:
> added latest resolved issues for 2.0 release
>
> Modified:
> commons/proper/pool/trunk/src/cha
Hi Phil,
indeed I abused of bash scripting :( going to re-update them in a while :P
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 4/28/11 1:16 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Hi Oliver,
>> thanks for your review! Abou
On 4/28/11 1:40 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 28/04/2011 00:43, Gump a écrit :
>> To whom it may engage...
>>
>> This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
>> more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
>> and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.a
On 4/28/11 1:16 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
> thanks for your review! About your questions:
>
> - I should have deleted the md5/sha1 files because I got confused by
> the paragraph "C.2 Remove SHA1 and MD5 Fingerprints of PGP Signatures"
> on wiki[1], but I can easily re-upload them;
Wh
Hi Hen,
I think that we should move this discussion on general@incubator, or not?
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Oh, and private@ is for PMC members, so no. Does a private ppmc list
> get created? it
Oh, and private@ is for PMC members, so no. Does a private ppmc list
get created? it's been a few years since I did Incubator things :)
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> I agree that this approach would simplify the process of merging in
> the future OGNL to
Both the ognl-incubator and commons-dev groups can be given rw perms in svn.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> I agree that this approach would simplify the process of merging in
> the future OGNL to Commons, good thought!!!
> Just a question: how do we solve
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=7780&projectId=97
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Thu 28 Apr 2011 10:24:31 +
Finished at: Thu 28 Apr 2011 10:26:13 +
Total time: 1m 42s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
> As a side note: Christian, can you help me with the Issue I filled to
> INFRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3597
> Many thanks in advance!!!
Unfortunately I have no karma to do the most of the stuff - I am not
in infra team
I just can help with creating incubator website etc.
Chr
Le 28/04/2011 00:43, Gump a écrit :
> To whom it may engage...
>
> This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
> more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
> and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
>
> Project commons-math has an issu
Hi all guys,
I agree that this approach would simplify the process of merging in
the future OGNL to Commons, good thought!!!
Just a question: how do we solve the fact the initial committers list
are in the PPMC? Shall other people join private@c.a.o?
As a side note: Christian, can you help me with
Hi Emmanuel,
as I replied to Oliver, 0.5 is just a maintenance release, (fixed
bugs, checkstyle errors, ...) and any other improvement wasn't even
planned.
Feel free to fill a JIRA issue to remind everybody this is a work has
to be done for 0.6.
Many thanks for your review, have a nice day!!!
Simo
Hi Oliver,
thanks for your review! About your questions:
- I should have deleted the md5/sha1 files because I got confused by
the paragraph "C.2 Remove SHA1 and MD5 Fingerprints of PGP Signatures"
on wiki[1], but I can easily re-upload them;
- About the description: I'll add it as well and re-up
It's not a regression issue though. I'd recommend opening up a JIRA
item to make sure it's something that 0.6 thinks about.
Hen
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I'm a bit concerned by the low test coverage (~40%). Some classes like
> ServiceDiscoveryTask are not even tes
26 matches
Mail list logo
