To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
I just (hopefully) fixed the output jar name in gump metadata.
Phil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-pool2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Prior to the fix for DBCP-333, DriverManager was always used to load
drivers. As documented in the patch and updated javadoc,
DriverManager is now used only when loading via configured
driverClassLoader or the context classloader fails. Might this
change cause problems for implementations that so
Probably wrapped integers would also do badly. The issue seemed to be that all object creates and method calls were expensive, far
more expensive than a final static int or array access. The JDK magically transforms the literal use of objects and methods into
much faster, but equivalent code.
It would be interesting to see how an int wrapper would perform on Android.
-Adrian
On 4/25/2011 2:21 PM, Stephen Williams wrote:
Note that, as of Android 2.2's Dalvik at least, that Java5 enums are
much much slower than using constants. For anything that gets used
frequently, and that might
On 4/25/11 1:40 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all,
> in the first pool2 attempt we agreed on replacing numeric/byte
> constants with Java5 enums, do we agree on doing it also for first
> pool2 release?
> Thanks in advance!
> Simo
Let's hold for now so we can get DBCP working with just the base
cha
Note that, as of Android 2.2's Dalvik at least, that Java5 enums are much much slower than using constants. For anything that gets
used frequently, and that might be used on Android, that is a problem. I wrote and optimized a SAX and DOM parser on Android.
While the JDK will optimize out most
That would fall under the Java 5 umbrella, like generics, so that's OK with
me for an ASAP pool2 release.
Gary
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all,
> in the first pool2 attempt we agreed on replacing numeric/byte
> constants with Java5 enums, do we agree on doing it a
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Gary Gregory
>>> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
Hi all,
in the first pool2 attempt we agreed on replacing numeric/byte
constants with Java5 enums, do we agree on doing it also for first
pool2 release?
Thanks in advance!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> >> On Apr 23, 2011, at 7:10, "Jörg Schaible"
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Gary Gregory wrote:
> >>>
> Hi All:
>
> I fin
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Am 25.04.2011 09:17, schrieb Henri Yandell:
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Henri Yandell
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Gary Gregory
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Matt Benson
wrote:
>
Shouldn't the FormattableUtils SIMPLEST_FORMAT be "%s"?
Gary
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Henri Yandell
> wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
>
Am 25.04.2011 09:17, schrieb Henri Yandell:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
Hi All:
Now that we have the sh
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 3:17 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Henri Yandell
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Matt Benson
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Gary Gregory
> >>>
Hi Phil/all,
after restored/merging the generics, the test method
TestGenericKeyedObjectPool.testMaxTotalLRU is stuck :(
I tried to debug it to understand what happened but didn't figure out
what happened ;(
Can anyone help me please? I put the @Ignore annotation ATM on that method.
Thanks in advan
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Gary Gregory
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi All:
>>> >
>>> > Now that we have the shiny and new Forma
20 matches
Mail list logo
