Re: [Lang] Pair toString

2011-04-20 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Hen, Henri Yandell wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Gary Gregory > wrote: [snip] > > PairFormat class needed rather than relying on toString functionality :) > > Could we implement Formattable? +1 Something new learned today :) - Jörg

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-04-20 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [CLI] fixing warnings

2011-04-20 Thread Simone Tripodi
Bonjour Emmanuel! don't worry, since I need to better understand CLI internal code, I just would like to fix minor-minor warnings such Generics, missing @Override/@Deprecated annotations, final fields where possible, etc I don't intend modify the CLI code/behavior at all, once I'll feel more famili

Re: [CLI] fixing warnings

2011-04-20 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 20/04/2011 22:49, Simone Tripodi a écrit : Hi all guys, any objection if I provide help on fixing checkstyle/findbugs/compiler warnings? Thank you for helping, but please don't rush, CLI is a very subtle beast that gets easily broken by an apparently innocent change. Emmanuel Bourg smi

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-04-20 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [Lang] Pair toString

2011-04-20 Thread Henri Yandell
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Matt Benson wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Gary Gregory >> wrote: >> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Jörg Schaible > >wrote: >> > >> >> Gary Gregory wrote: >> >> >> >> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011

Re: [Lang] Pair toString

2011-04-20 Thread Gary Gregory
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Matt Benson wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Gary Gregory > wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Jörg Schaible >wrote: > > > >> Gary Gregory wrote: > >> > >> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Matt Benson > >> wrote: > >> > > >> >> On Wed, Apr 2

Re: [CLI] fixing warnings

2011-04-20 Thread Gary Gregory
Fire away I say. G On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, > any objection if I provide help on fixing checkstyle/findbugs/compiler > warnings? > Thanks in advance, > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > >

Re: [Lang] Pair toString

2011-04-20 Thread Matt Benson
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Matt Benson wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: >> >>> Gary Gregory wrote: >>> >>> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Matt Benson >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:

Re: [Lang] Pair toString

2011-04-20 Thread Matt Benson
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > >> Gary Gregory wrote: >> >> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Matt Benson >> wrote: >> > >> >> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Henri Yandell >> >> wrote: >> >> > Is Pair now good (fo

[CLI] fixing warnings

2011-04-20 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys, any objection if I provide help on fixing checkstyle/findbugs/compiler warnings? Thanks in advance, Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commo

Re: [Lang] Pair toString

2011-04-20 Thread Gary Gregory
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Gary Gregory wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Matt Benson > wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Henri Yandell > >> wrote: > >> > Is Pair now good (for a value of consensually agreed good)? > >> > >> Good enough, al

Re: [Lang] Pair toString

2011-04-20 Thread Jörg Schaible
Gary Gregory wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Matt Benson wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Henri Yandell >> wrote: >> > Is Pair now good (for a value of consensually agreed good)? >> >> Good enough, although Stephen noted in ImmutablePair's javadoc that >> being non-final,

Re: [Lang] Pair toString

2011-04-20 Thread Gary Gregory
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Matt Benson wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > > Is Pair now good (for a value of consensually agreed good)? > > Good enough, although Stephen noted in ImmutablePair's javadoc that > being non-final, a subclass could add > undesirabl

Re: [Lang] Pair toString

2011-04-20 Thread sebb
On 20 April 2011 18:24, Matt Benson wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: >> Is Pair now good (for a value of consensually agreed good)? > > Good enough, although Stephen noted in ImmutablePair's javadoc that > being non-final, a subclass could add > undesirable/counter-t

Re: [net] binary compatibility be damned

2011-04-20 Thread sebb
Many applications rely on a single class-loader. Not all applications can easily be changed to use multiple classloaders, and anyway I don't think Commons should force end-users to use multiple class-loaders to fix compatibility issues. Since a single class loader can only load a single instance

Re: [Lang] Pair toString

2011-04-20 Thread Matt Benson
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > Is Pair now good (for a value of consensually agreed good)? Good enough, although Stephen noted in ImmutablePair's javadoc that being non-final, a subclass could add undesirable/counter-to-expectation behavior. I can't see any reason why we

Re: [lang] Time for RC3?

2011-04-20 Thread Jörg Schaible
Henri Yandell wrote: > I think we're ready for another release candidate. > > Does anyone know of any remaining items? JIRA is clean, and I don't > see anything in the email threads that implies more work needs to be > done. It's about time ;-) - Jörg -

Re: [lang] Time for RC3?

2011-04-20 Thread Gary Gregory
There is the get simple class name API issue from another email today. I am in transit and can't file a jira ATm. Gary On Apr 20, 2011, at 2:56, Henri Yandell wrote: > I think we're ready for another release candidate. > > Does anyone know of any remaining items? JIRA is clean, and I don't > se