[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-04-15 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-04-15 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [lang] Remaining interesting varargs list

2011-04-15 Thread Gary Gregory
Yes, vararg away! :) Gary On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > I think this is the remaining list of things that might be interesting > for varargs: > > $ findj src/main/java/ | xg '\[\][^,(]*)' | grep 'public static' | > grep -v ArrayUtils.java | grep -v NumberUtils.java | g

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-math (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-04-15 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[lang] Remaining interesting varargs list

2011-04-15 Thread Henri Yandell
I think this is the remaining list of things that might be interesting for varargs: $ findj src/main/java/ | xg '\[\][^,(]*)' | grep 'public static' | grep -v ArrayUtils.java | grep -v NumberUtils.java | grep -v IEEE | grep -v EntityArrays.java | grep -v ExceptionUtils.java | grep -v ConstructorUt

Re: [net] binary compatibility be damned

2011-04-15 Thread Gary Gregory
If your are going to break binary compatibility then a major release is the time to do it. Is there any question that the design is wrong? Gary On Apr 15, 2011, at 10:49, "Daniel F. Savarese" wrote: > > Prior to the 3.0 release, I'm trying to review recent code changes and > test the code in wh