[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-04-09 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-04-09 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [discovery] 0.5 almost ready for RC2

2011-04-09 Thread sebb
On 10 April 2011 00:52, Simone Tripodi wrote: > nice idea! is `mvn deploy` enough to upload a snapshot? You can use mvn deploy -Ptest-deploy to deploy locally to target/deploy to check that the contents are OK. I've no idea if snapshot deployment works without Nexus (and Discovery is not using

Re: [discovery] 0.5 almost ready for RC2

2011-04-09 Thread Simone Tripodi
nice idea! is `mvn deploy` enough to upload a snapshot? thanks in advance! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 1:42 AM, sebb wrote: > On 10 April 2011 00:29, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> Hi all guys, >> first of all I'd like to say a big "t

Re: [discovery] 0.5 almost ready for RC2

2011-04-09 Thread sebb
On 10 April 2011 00:29, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, > first of all I'd like to say a big "thank you" to Jochen, Joerg and > Seb for the help and for reviewing the issues :) > If there are no more errors related to latest issues, we've finally > arrived at the situation that discovery has

Re: svn commit: r1090700 - in /commons/proper/discovery/trunk: RELEASE-NOTES.txt src/changes/changes.xml src/java/org/apache/commons/discovery/resource/classes/DiscoverClasses.java

2011-04-09 Thread Simone Tripodi
right, I originally intended handling different situation, but the null check is more than enough thanks! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 1:26 AM, sebb wrote: > On 9 April 2011 23:48,   wrote: >> Author: simonetripodi >> Date: Sat Ap

[discovery] 0.5 almost ready for RC2

2011-04-09 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys, first of all I'd like to say a big "thank you" to Jochen, Joerg and Seb for the help and for reviewing the issues :) If there are no more errors related to latest issues, we've finally arrived at the situation that discovery has 0 checkstyle errors, 0 open issues and I'm tempted to pro

Re: svn commit: r1090700 - in /commons/proper/discovery/trunk: RELEASE-NOTES.txt src/changes/changes.xml src/java/org/apache/commons/discovery/resource/classes/DiscoverClasses.java

2011-04-09 Thread sebb
On 9 April 2011 23:48, wrote: > Author: simonetripodi > Date: Sat Apr  9 22:48:40 2011 > New Revision: 1090700 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1090700&view=rev > Log: > DISCOVERY-13: Problem with Oracle JVM classLoader [...] > > Modified: > commons/proper/discovery/trunk/src/java/org

Re: svn commit: r1090656 - in /commons/proper/math/trunk: ./ src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/optimization/linear/ src/site/xdoc/ src/test/java/org/apache/commons/math/optimization/linear/

2011-04-09 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello Luc. > >> for (int i = tableau.getNumObjectiveFunctions(); i < > >> tableau.getWidth() - 1; i++) { > >> -if (MathUtils.compareTo(tableau.getEntry(0, i), minValue, > >> epsilon) < 0) { > >> -minValue = tableau.getEntry(0, i); > >> +final doub

Re: svn commit: r1090656 - in /commons/proper/math/trunk: ./ src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/optimization/linear/ src/site/xdoc/ src/test/java/org/apache/commons/math/optimization/linear/

2011-04-09 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 09/04/2011 23:08, Gilles Sadowski a écrit : > On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 07:20:48PM -, l...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: luc >> Date: Sat Apr 9 19:20:47 2011 >> New Revision: 1090656 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1090656&view=rev >> Log: >> Fixed two errors in simplex solver when

Re: svn commit: r1090656 - in /commons/proper/math/trunk: ./ src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/optimization/linear/ src/site/xdoc/ src/test/java/org/apache/commons/math/optimization/linear/

2011-04-09 Thread Gilles Sadowski
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 07:20:48PM -, l...@apache.org wrote: > Author: luc > Date: Sat Apr 9 19:20:47 2011 > New Revision: 1090656 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1090656&view=rev > Log: > Fixed two errors in simplex solver when entries are close together or > when variables are not

Re: [lang] Collections -> Lang

2011-04-09 Thread Fadil
unsubscribe On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > Deja Vu time. > > Collections is dead. I hereby give notice that there are a few basic > classes in Collections that I want to copy into Lang and genericize > (ComparableComparator, ReverseComparator etc - dull stuff instead of >

Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC2)

2011-04-09 Thread Oliver Heger
Build works fine on Java 1.5 and 1.6 on Windows 7. Artifacts and side look good. +1 Many thanks for taking care! Oliver Am 09.04.2011 07:06, schrieb Henri Yandell: Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again. RC2 is available here: http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC2/

Re: [lang] Collections -> Lang

2011-04-09 Thread James Ring
Hey David, On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 6:44 AM, David Karlsen wrote: > We dropped collections in favour of guava and are quite happy with that - > but I'd like to see the MultiKey class survive - any chance for that? If your keys have dimension of 2 then com.google.common.collect.Table might be good

Re: [lang] Collections -> Lang

2011-04-09 Thread David Karlsen
We dropped collections in favour of guava and are quite happy with that - but I'd like to see the MultiKey class survive - any chance for that? 2011/4/7 Simone Tripodi > Hi all guys, > I don't want to hijack the thread but also Discovery was in "critical > care" but we gave it a new life, if it

Re: [NET] 3.0 release packaging

2011-04-09 Thread sebb
On 9 April 2011 12:54, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Apr 9, 2011, at 6:45, sebb wrote: > >> On 9 April 2011 04:00, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> On Apr 8, 2011, at 21:51, sebb wrote: >>> On 9 April 2011 01:21, Gary Gregory wrote: > Can we add a test jar to the list please? The apache release pro

Re: [NET] 3.0 release packaging

2011-04-09 Thread Gary Gregory
On Apr 9, 2011, at 6:45, sebb wrote: > On 9 April 2011 04:00, Gary Gregory wrote: >> On Apr 8, 2011, at 21:51, sebb wrote: >> >>> On 9 April 2011 01:21, Gary Gregory wrote: Can we add a test jar to the list please? The apache release profile should take care of it but I want to menti

Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC2)

2011-04-09 Thread Gary Gregory
On Apr 9, 2011, at 3:11, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > FYI, I don't think I can review until Tuesday > Stephen > Same here. No laptop on this vacation. Back on Monday. Gary > On 9 April 2011 06:25, Henri Yandell wrote: >> Ignore the date btw. This vote will close at a time greater than 72 >> h

Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC2)

2011-04-09 Thread sebb
On 9 April 2011 06:06, Henri Yandell wrote: > Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again. > > RC2 is available here: > >  http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC2/ > > Maven artifacts: > >  http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC2/maven/ Packaging etc all looks OK. S

Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC2)

2011-04-09 Thread Henri Yandell
That'll be the one. On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 3:54 AM, sebb wrote: > On 9 April 2011 11:50, Henri Yandell wrote: >> The obvious one. >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/ > > I take it you mean > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC2/ > >

Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC2)

2011-04-09 Thread sebb
On 9 April 2011 11:50, Henri Yandell wrote: > The obvious one. > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/ I take it you mean http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC2/ > On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 3:48 AM, sebb wrote: >> SVN tag? >> >> On 9 April 201

Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC2)

2011-04-09 Thread Henri Yandell
The obvious one. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/ On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 3:48 AM, sebb wrote: > SVN tag? > > On 9 April 2011 06:06, Henri Yandell wrote: >> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again. >> >> RC2 is available here: >> >>  http://people.apache.org/~bayard/

Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC2)

2011-04-09 Thread sebb
SVN tag? On 9 April 2011 06:06, Henri Yandell wrote: > Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again. > > RC2 is available here: > >  http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC2/ > > Maven artifacts: > >  http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC2/maven/ > > Website: > >  htt

Re: [NET] 3.0 release packaging

2011-04-09 Thread sebb
On 9 April 2011 04:00, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Apr 8, 2011, at 21:51, sebb wrote: > >> On 9 April 2011 01:21, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> Can we add a test jar to the list please? The apache release profile >>> should take care of it but I want to mention it here explicitly. >> >> Do you mean the "

Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC2)

2011-04-09 Thread Stephen Colebourne
FYI, I don't think I can review until Tuesday Stephen On 9 April 2011 06:25, Henri Yandell wrote: > Ignore the date btw. This vote will close at a time greater than 72 > hours (or sooner if I see consensus towards -1). > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: >> Lang is ready to