I'm fine with removing the names. However, I prefer to keep the author tag
pointing to the team list page.
Ralph
On Apr 4, 2011, at 11:09 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> On 4/4/2011 2:22 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 4/4/11 2:18 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
I thought we had settled on '@author Apache
On 4/4/2011 2:22 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 4/4/11 2:18 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
I thought we had settled on '@author Apache Software Foundation',
Did we? TBH I find that pretty pointless and nothing more than noise.
I'd be in favor of removing them all together.
I agree with Torsten. I got st
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 5:13 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Apr 4, 2011, at 1:45, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>
>> Hi Gary!
>> I honestly even thought about it, so sorry! :( Since Discovery
>> activity has not been hight since 2008, I just thought adding the
>> missing generics support and nothing more :(
Thanks a lot you all for the feedbacks, and thanks Henri for the script :)
Have a nice day!!!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 201
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 4/4/11 2:18 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> I thought we had settled on '@author Apache Software Foundation',
Di
+1 to all of the below.
The lesson from Lang imo is to charge in and just do it. It'll
generate ideas once people are free to consider backwards incompatible
changes. Rolling back is always possible if we decide we didn't really
justify a 2.0.
Look at what else is out there. Is the scope of Codec
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 4/4/11 2:18 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
I thought we had settled on '@author Apache Software Foundation',
>>> Did we? TBH I find that pretty pointless and nothing more than noi
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 4/4/11 2:18 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
>>> I thought we had settled on '@author Apache Software Foundation',
>> Did we? TBH I find that pretty pointless and nothing more than noise.
>> I'd be in favor of removing them all together.
> I agree w
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> If this goes into the apache-release profile (in other words, if the
> test-jar is built for releases only), then I have no problems with
> that.
>
There is a 'release' profile and a 'apache.release' profile. I imagine you
mean the latter.
FYI
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-jmeter-dev/200402.mbox/%3c4039f65e.7020...@atg.com%3E
Paul
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Apr 4, 2011, at 17:23, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
> > On 4/4/11 2:18 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> >>> I thought we had settled on '@
On Apr 4, 2011, at 17:23, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 4/4/11 2:18 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
>>> I thought we had settled on '@author Apache Software Foundation',
>> Did we? TBH I find that pretty pointless and nothing more than noise.
>> I'd be in favor of removing them all together.
> I agree with To
In VFS I have been including an @author tag that links to the VFS team page.
Ralph
On Apr 4, 2011, at 2:48 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
>
>>> I thought we had settled on '@author Apache Software Foundation',
>>
>> Did we?
>
>
> Well, yes, ot
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> > I thought we had settled on '@author Apache Software Foundation',
>
> Did we?
Well, yes, otherwise, I would not have bothered to do it. It feels like one
of the topics that comes and goes, were we agree but don't document.
Gary
> TBH I
On 4/4/11 2:18 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
>> I thought we had settled on '@author Apache Software Foundation',
> Did we? TBH I find that pretty pointless and nothing more than noise.
> I'd be in favor of removing them all together.
I agree with Torsten. I got stalled in DBCP/pool because at least
so
> I thought we had settled on '@author Apache Software Foundation',
Did we? TBH I find that pretty pointless and nothing more than noise.
I'd be in favor of removing them all together.
cheers,
Torsten
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: d
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> when joined the Commons as Committer, I remember that someone wrote in
> the ML that @authors tag should be removed from sources because
> committers/contributors are mentioned in the pom.
> Do I remember wrong, or shall I star
Hi all guys,
when joined the Commons as Committer, I remember that someone wrote in
the ML that @authors tag should be removed from sources because
committers/contributors are mentioned in the pom.
Do I remember wrong, or shall I start removing all @authors tags - at
least from Discovery?
Many than
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> What about dropping deprecated items? That should be OK in a 2.0. I was
> planning on doing that today.
>
> That does not preserve drop-in reverse compatibility but we do it in major
> releases.
First step to binary incompatibility, which I s
If this goes into the apache-release profile (in other words, if the
test-jar is built for releases only), then I have no problems with
that.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I'd like to create a test jar for commons components automagically (see
> below for
Hello All,
I'd like to create a test jar for commons components automagically (see
below for the why and how).
Any thoughts against?
Thank you,
Gary
-- Forwarded message --
From: David Karlsen
Date: Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 12:33 PM
Subject: Re: [ALL] Maven magic: creating a test ja
Thank you sir!
Gary
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 12:33 PM, David Karlsen wrote:
> Add this
>
>org.apache.maven.plugins
>maven-jar-plugin
>
>
>
>test-jar
>
Add this
org.apache.maven.plugins
maven-jar-plugin
test-jar
2011/4/4 Gary Gregory
Hi All,
For Codec 2 I want to generate a jar file that contains all the unit tests
along with the product jar.
My goal is be able to use this test jar in our product as a sanity check. In
my perfect world, I'd like to have one for each Commons component, but I'll
start at home, in [codec] first.
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=6736&projectId=97
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Mon 4 Apr 2011 16:21:02 +
Finished at: Mon 4 Apr 2011 16:23:16 +
Total time: 2m 14s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build N
Thank you Phil! And now on to the juicy 2.0 bits. I want my generics...
yesterday :)
Gary
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the release of
> version 1.5.6 of Commons Pool. Commons Pool provides a general
> purpose object poolin
Hi Phil!
I'm at work now, but this evening at home I'll be able start taking
care of 0) and 1)!
Just for the record: time ago, in the commons-pool wiki page, I
reported some points we already discussed in the ML, I hope they can
help you for designing the roadmap.
Have a nice day!
Simo
http://pe
On 4/4/11 7:19 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Phil,
> I think I can be helpful there, but I din't understand which steps are
> needed to get the trunk in a better order, I would be glad to fix it!
> Thanks in advance! :)
Thanks, Simo!
After cleaning up my local checkout, I see now that things are
The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the release of
version 1.5.6 of Commons Pool. Commons Pool provides a general
purpose object pooling API, an implementation toolkit and some pool
implementations.
Version 1.5.6 is a patch release including bug fixes only. Source
and binary distribut
Hi Phil,
I think I can be helpful there, but I din't understand which steps are
needed to get the trunk in a better order, I would be glad to fix it!
Thanks in advance! :)
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
On 4/4/11 4:25 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 4 April 2011 07:36, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> I will be sending the 1.5.6 release announcement shortly. When
>> updating the pool website, I started by trying to use trunk, but
>> found the output confusing, since we are in process of changing the
>> groupId and pa
Thanks for the feedback, thanks!!! :)
Have a nice day!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Apr 4, 2011, at 8:36, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>
>> Hi Gary,
>> I opted for fixing all the warnings before releasin
On Apr 4, 2011, at 8:36, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Gary,
> I opted for fixing all the warnings before releasing, it is not hard
> to do and doesn't require a large amount of effort, so since I'm
> working on it, I take advantage to clean up the component as much as
> possible.
> I would like to
I'll try it when pushing discovery-05-RC2 and I'll let you know! :)
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Apr 4, 2011, at 8:24, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>
>> OK, I understand :)
>> btw do you see any issue if I ad
Hi Gary,
I opted for fixing all the warnings before releasing, it is not hard
to do and doesn't require a large amount of effort, so since I'm
working on it, I take advantage to clean up the component as much as
possible.
I would like to follow a path to 1.0, let's see how the Discovery can
be impr
On Apr 4, 2011, at 8:24, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> OK, I understand :)
> btw do you see any issue if I add the wagon-scp in the parent for the
> maven-3 profile? It should be painless...
> Thanks in advance!
> Simo
What happens when you try https?
Gary
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
OK, I understand :)
btw do you see any issue if I add the wagon-scp in the parent for the
maven-3 profile? It should be painless...
Thanks in advance!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I have https URLs in
On Apr 4, 2011, at 1:45, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Gary!
> I honestly even thought about it, so sorry! :( Since Discovery
> activity has not been hight since 2008, I just thought adding the
> missing generics support and nothing more :(
> I don't think that should be a blocking issue since we've
Gary
> Warnings :)
Hm. The top of the report says 0 warnings and 329 errors.
Gary
>
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> Any thoughts on fixing the 300+ checkstyle errors?
>>
>> Gary
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Simone Tripodi
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all guys!
>>> we ha
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Nick Burch wrote:
At the moment, the Email Validator considers @localhost email addresses
to be invalid, due to the Domain Validator not considering it to be
valid.
Initially I thought this was wrong for all cases, so I opened
VALIDATOR-292 and attached a patch that fixed
I have https URLs in my settings.xml. Maybe that's it.
Gary
On Apr 4, 2011, at 1:52, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Gary,
> I honestly don't know why, I'm not in the position to reply, but while
> trying to release the discovery-0.5-RC1 using mvn3 I got the error
> below; after a little investigati
On 4 April 2011 08:38, Supun Kamburugamuva wrote:
> I'm interested in writing a FTPS client with client certificate
> authentication. Is there a sample that I can follow?
This is a question for the Commons User list
> Thanks,
> --
> Supun Kamburugamuva
> Technical Lead & Product Manager, WSO2 I
On 4 April 2011 07:36, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I will be sending the 1.5.6 release announcement shortly. When
> updating the pool website, I started by trying to use trunk, but
> found the output confusing, since we are in process of changing the
> groupId and package name. I decided, therefore, to
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>
>> I've rolled the code back. Now I'm thinking the following are
>> candidates to roll back to String:
>>
>> public static String stripAccents(CharSequence input) {
>> public static
I'm interested in writing a FTPS client with client certificate
authentication. Is there a sample that I can follow?
Thanks,
--
Supun Kamburugamuva
Technical Lead & Product Manager, WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
Member, Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org
WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.org
E
Hi all,
the points discussed by Phil are valid enough to declare this vote
cancelled. I'll push a new RC as soon as I'm ready :)
Thanks everybody for the feedbacks!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
-- Forwarded message --
From: Simone Tripodi
Hi Phil,
that makes a lot of sense, I'll cancel this vote and discuss in a
separated thread about JIRA issues.
Have a nice day and thanks for your feedback!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 4/3/11 2:11
On 4/3/11 2:11 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys!
> we haven't released a new version of Apache Commons Discovery since
> 2008 (!!!), since I recently had to use it in a project I thought it
> would have been fine having at least the Java5 generics support.
> So, after 2 days of hard work - a
48 matches
Mail list logo
