[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-collections4 (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-01-09 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-collections4 has an issue affecting its community integration. Thi

Re: [lang] math expression parser

2011-01-09 Thread Henri Yandell
Or kick it off at apache-extras.org :) On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:17 AM, Paul Libbrecht wrote: > Frank, > > why not propose this as another project? > It requires more maintenance, that is true. > Sandbox is designed for that, including to evaluate if there are user bases. > > I tend to feel your

Re: [lang] Doing a Lang 2.6 release

2011-01-09 Thread sebb
On 10 January 2011 00:26, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:21 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 9 January 2011 22:46, Niall Pemberton wrote: >>> I would like to do a Lang 2.6 release. I have ported some of the >>> compatible changes from the trunk to the LANG_2_X branch - details in >>> th

RE: [lang] Doing a Lang 2.6 release

2011-01-09 Thread Gary Gregory
I'm all for a 2.6 release, nice work. If we can resolve the clone issue ([LANG-302]), that would be good too. Gary Gregory Senior Software Engineer Rocket Software 3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 820 . Atlanta, GA 30326 . USA Tel: +1.404.760.1560 Email: ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com Web: seagull.rocket

Re: [lang] Doing a Lang 2.6 release

2011-01-09 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:21 PM, sebb wrote: > On 9 January 2011 22:46, Niall Pemberton wrote: >> I would like to do a Lang 2.6 release. I have ported some of the >> compatible changes from the trunk to the LANG_2_X branch - details in >> the release notes: >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/c

Re: [lang] Doing a Lang 2.6 release

2011-01-09 Thread sebb
On 9 January 2011 22:46, Niall Pemberton wrote: > I would like to do a Lang 2.6 release. I have ported some of the > compatible changes from the trunk to the LANG_2_X branch - details in > the release notes: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/branches/LANG_2_X/RELEASE-NOTES.tx

[lang] Doing a Lang 2.6 release

2011-01-09 Thread Niall Pemberton
I would like to do a Lang 2.6 release. I have ported some of the compatible changes from the trunk to the LANG_2_X branch - details in the release notes: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/branches/LANG_2_X/RELEASE-NOTES.txt The site is here: http://people.apache.org/~niallp/lan

Re: HttpClient - use ConcurrentHashMap instead of HashMap?

2011-01-09 Thread sebb
On 9 January 2011 16:20, Ralph Goers wrote: > Why did you post this to the commons dev list instead of http-components dev? Oops, sorry! However, the timings might still be interesting for Commons components... > Ralph > > On Jan 9, 2011, at 7:32 AM, sebb wrote: > >> AbstractCookieSpec uses an

Re: svn commit: r1056747 - in /commons/proper/math: branches/MATH_2_X/src/site/xdoc/changes.xml trunk/src/site/xdoc/changes.xml

2011-01-09 Thread Mikkel Meyer Andersen
Hi, Thanks! It should probably be mikl, my username, instead of mikkel, my name. I don't have access to committing these two weeks, but I'll change it in two weeks time. Cheers, Mikkel. 2011/1/8 : > Author: psteitz > Date: Sat Jan  8 17:50:54 2011 > New Revision: 1056747 > > URL: http://svn.apa

Re: HttpClient - use ConcurrentHashMap instead of HashMap?

2011-01-09 Thread Ralph Goers
Why did you post this to the commons dev list instead of http-components dev? Ralph On Jan 9, 2011, at 7:32 AM, sebb wrote: > AbstractCookieSpec uses an unsynchronised HashMap, so is not thread-safe. > > AIUI, ConcurrentHashMap has much better performance than a > synchronised HashMap - but of

HttpClient - use ConcurrentHashMap instead of HashMap?

2011-01-09 Thread sebb
AbstractCookieSpec uses an unsynchronised HashMap, so is not thread-safe. AIUI, ConcurrentHashMap has much better performance than a synchronised HashMap - but of course we are not using synch here. A quick test using the code at [1] (1 thread, 1 VM) appears to show that the performance of CHM a

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-01-09 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-quartz (in module commons-jelly) failed

2011-01-09 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-quartz has an issue affecting its community integratio

Re: [Math] Explanations for MATH-459

2011-01-09 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hi Michael, Le 09/01/2011 08:58, Michael Giannakopoulos a écrit : > Thanks a lot for the explanation! One question that i have is this: Commons > Math libraries don't include a package with > 'org.apache.commmons.math.exception' (at least as far as the version 2.1 is > concerned...). Is there anot

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-01-09 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This