[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-collections4 (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-01-05 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-collections4 has an issue affecting its community integration. Thi

Re: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.5 based on RC1

2011-01-05 Thread Phil Steitz
+1 Phil On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: > Hi, > > Commons Daemon 1.0.5 release candidate is available for > testing at [1]. The SVN tag is [2] and if voted will be > renamed to COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_5. > > This is bug-fix release fixing regression [3] so please > vote ASAP so we

Re: [lang] math expression parser

2011-01-05 Thread Gary Gregory
On Jan 5, 2011, at 18:05, "Stephen Colebourne" wrote: > I would recommend against this for [lang]. > > [lang] is a low-level project intended to have no framework or > "religious" aspects, just simple relatively non-controversial elements > that assist the basic Java packages. A maths parser, ho

Re: [lang] math expression parser

2011-01-05 Thread Stephen Colebourne
I would recommend against this for [lang]. [lang] is a low-level project intended to have no framework or "religious" aspects, just simple relatively non-controversial elements that assist the basic Java packages. A maths parser, however useful, isn't that closely related IMO. Stephen On 5 Janu

Re: [lang] math expression parser

2011-01-05 Thread Ted Dunning
These things tend to be a slippery slope. Turing completeness is at the bottom of that hill. On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:18 PM, frank asseg wrote: > Hola Ted, > > On 05.01.2011 21:02, Ted Dunning wrote: > > Or bsh or jruby or rhino or groovy? > sorry, i did not make myself clear but i was talking

Re: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.5 based on RC1

2011-01-05 Thread sebb
On 5 January 2011 12:21, Mladen Turk wrote: > Hi, > > Commons Daemon 1.0.5 release candidate is available for > testing at [1]. The SVN tag is [2] and if voted will be > renamed to COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_5. > > This is bug-fix release fixing regression [3] so please > vote ASAP so we can release this

RE: [lang] math expression parser

2011-01-05 Thread Gary Gregory
Bonjour Frank, I think of [lang] as "what is missing in java.lang", and, to be honest, evaluating math expressions is not on my list ;) Complex or not I expect math things in [math]. I, as others, am leery of introducing yet another expression language. Gary Gregory Senior Software Engineer R

Re: [lang] math expression parser

2011-01-05 Thread frank asseg
Hola Gary! On 05.01.2011 22:04, Gary Gregory wrote: > Why should this be in [lang] instead of [math]? I actually thought about posting on [math] but when i browsed the math library i gained the impression that it's much more concerned with more complex mathematical issues like integration of numer

Re: [lang] math expression parser

2011-01-05 Thread frank asseg
Hola Paul, On 05.01.2011 21:49, Paul Libbrecht wrote: > I find the classname PostfixExpression pretty bizarre... should it be simply > MathExpressionParser ? heh, you got me there, the naming is pretty awkward and stems from the fact that an infix expression "2 + 2", where the operator stands bet

RE: [lang] math expression parser

2011-01-05 Thread Gary Gregory
Why should this be in [lang] instead of [math]? Gary Gregory Senior Software Engineer Rocket Software 3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 820 . Atlanta, GA 30326 . USA Tel: +1.404.760.1560 Email: ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com Web: seagull.rocketsoftware.com  > -Original Message- > From: Paul Lib

Re: [lang] math expression parser

2011-01-05 Thread Paul Libbrecht
Well... I never thought about such but maybe it's indeed useful. Something short and tiny that is a lot more compact than the java syntax for math but would have about the same capabilities. I am not used to commit to lang so we'll have to wait for them to answer. I find the classname Post

Re: [lang] math expression parser

2011-01-05 Thread Jason Young
While we're at it, I also have a feature complete mathematical parser that evaluates sets of expressions, variables and functions all at once over an arbitrary domain. Go to http://zee.dev.java.net and see the code samples. What do you think? On Jan 5, 2011 3:18 PM, "frank asseg" wrote: > Hola Te

Re: [lang] math expression parser

2011-01-05 Thread frank asseg
Hola Ted, On 05.01.2011 21:02, Ted Dunning wrote: > Or bsh or jruby or rhino or groovy? sorry, i did not make myself clear but i was talking about a pure mathematical expresssion parser, intended for evaluating user input and the like, not a turing complete grammer but simply a way to evaluate thi

Re: [lang] math expression parser

2011-01-05 Thread frank asseg
Hola Paul, On 05.01.2011 20:51, Paul Libbrecht wrote: > I don't see why langs would have this, especially since it generally involves > variables, scopes, objects, etc. > Can you compare that to JEXL ? In comparison to JEXL i was looking for a possiblity to pass a simple math expression to an eva

Re: [lang] math expression parser

2011-01-05 Thread Ted Dunning
Or bsh or jruby or rhino or groovy? Why yet another? On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Paul Libbrecht wrote: > Frank, > > I don't see why langs would have this, especially since it generally > involves variables, scopes, objects, etc. > Can you compare that to JEXL ? > > paul > > > Le 5 janv. 20

Re: [lang] math expression parser

2011-01-05 Thread Paul Libbrecht
Frank, I don't see why langs would have this, especially since it generally involves variables, scopes, objects, etc. Can you compare that to JEXL ? paul Le 5 janv. 2011 à 20:49, frank asseg a écrit : > hola guys, > > i am currently working on a math expression parser, and wanted to ask if >

[lang] math expression parser

2011-01-05 Thread frank asseg
hola guys, i am currently working on a math expression parser, and wanted to ask if there is interest in adding such a functionality to commons-lang? it's a simple algorithm and id be happy to contribute to this project... http://projects.congrace.de/exp4j/download.html have fun! -- *frank asse

Re: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.5 based on RC1

2011-01-05 Thread Jörg Schaible
Mladen Turk wrote: > Hi, > > Commons Daemon 1.0.5 release candidate is available for > testing at [1]. The SVN tag is [2] and if voted will be > renamed to COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_5. > > This is bug-fix release fixing regression [3] so please > vote ASAP so we can release this update promptly. > Not

Re: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.5 based on RC1

2011-01-05 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Mladen Just to let you know I checked out the site, is fully online :) thanks for the suggestions, very appreciated, I'll give a try!!! All the best, Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 01/05/2011 03:28

Re: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.5 based on RC1

2011-01-05 Thread Mladen Turk
On 01/05/2011 03:28 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: Hi Mladen, java sources work good, unfortunately I'm not able to compile C sources on my mac. You will need Java Developer Package for Mac OS X since Apple has first said it will deprecate Java, and then sign a deal with Oracle. However this require

Re: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.5 based on RC1

2011-01-05 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Mladen, java sources work good, unfortunately I'm not able to compile C sources on my mac. On the release note, I'd replace 'Compatibility with 1.0.3' with 'Compatibility with 1.0.4', but that's not blocking. Site[1] dir is empty, is it wished? I don't see blocking issues, so I'm +1 All the best

Re: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.5 based on RC1

2011-01-05 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 01/05/2011 01:21 PM, Mladen Turk wrote: Hi, Commons Daemon 1.0.5 release candidate is available for testing at [1]. The SVN tag is [2] and if voted will be renamed to COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_5. This is bug-fix release fixing regression [3] so please vote ASAP so we can release this update promptl

[VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.5 based on RC1

2011-01-05 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi, Commons Daemon 1.0.5 release candidate is available for testing at [1]. The SVN tag is [2] and if voted will be renamed to COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_5. This is bug-fix release fixing regression [3] so please vote ASAP so we can release this update promptly. Not all binaries for all platforms have b

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-01-05 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-quartz (in module commons-jelly) failed

2011-01-05 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-quartz has an issue affecting its community integratio

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-01-05 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-email (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-01-05 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-email has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue