Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-math (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-12-28 Thread Mikkel Meyer Andersen
Hi, Thanks. I've purified the tests in 2.2 in revision 1053471 and in 3.0 in revision 1053472. Cheers, Mikkel. 2010/12/28 Phil Steitz : > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 4:11 AM, Mikkel Meyer Andersen wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm not sure

Re: [pool] reorganizing pool2.impl package and new possible pool implementations

2010-12-28 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Phil, thanks a lot, that's the kind of feedback I was waiting for :) I don't have a single use case to submit to justify why keeping the synchronization feature, but something suggests me to propose to maintain it. Since, as you already noticed, we can avoid to maintain synchronized pool implem

Re: [pool] reorganizing pool2.impl package and new possible pool implementations

2010-12-28 Thread Phil Steitz
I am +0 for replacing the synchronized pools in PoolUtils with this approach. The "0" is because the impls are already there and may perform better (quite possibly not), the "+" because there is less code in the proxy impl. I am also not 100% convinced that we should be providing these at all. T

Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-math (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-12-28 Thread Phil Steitz
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 4:11 AM, Mikkel Meyer Andersen wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm not sure I understand this. According to >> >> http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/apache-commons/commons-math/gump_work/build_apache-commons_commons-math.tx

Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-math (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-12-28 Thread Phil Steitz
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 4:11 AM, Mikkel Meyer Andersen wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not sure I understand this. According to > > http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/apache-commons/commons-math/gump_work/build_apache-commons_commons-math.txt > it fails at CauchyDistributionTest, FDistributionTest, and >

Re: [pool] reorganizing pool2.impl package and new possible pool implementations

2010-12-28 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi again guys, just realized that pasted code is not so readable, I just copied it on pastie[1]. If you don't have any objections, I can start committing that stuff so you can review it. Many thanks in advance, Simo [1] http://pastie.org/1411379 http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-collections4 (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-12-28 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-collections4 has an issue affecting its community integration. Thi

Re: [GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-math (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-12-28 Thread Mikkel Meyer Andersen
Hi, I'm not sure I understand this. According to http://vmgump.apache.org/gump/public/apache-commons/commons-math/gump_work/build_apache-commons_commons-math.txt it fails at CauchyDistributionTest, FDistributionTest, and TDistributionTest. I have a suspicion that it is my patch for MATH-385, but l

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-math (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-12-28 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue