just done, thanks Phil!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 6:36 AM, wrote:
>
>> Author: simonetripodi
>> Date: Wed Dec 22 11:36:49 2010
>> New Revision: 1051852
>>
>> URL: http://sv
Hi Phil,
>>
>> org.apache.commons.pool2.impl
>> | generic
>> | reference
>> | stack
>>
>> common stuff could be included directly under impl.
>>
>
> What exactl
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-email has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-collections4 has an issue affecting its community integration.
Thi
Apologies, IO 2.0.1 RC1 is available for review here:
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-2.0.1-rc1/
Niall
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 4:15 AM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> There have been a couple of bugs fixed since the IO 2.0 release, so I
> would like to release IO 2.0.1
>
> [ ] +1 Yes go ahead
There have been a couple of bugs fixed since the IO 2.0 release, so I
would like to release IO 2.0.1
[ ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC1
[ ] -1 No, because...
IO 2.0.1 RC1 is available for review here:
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-2.01.-rc1/
Maven artifacts are here:
http://peop
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 6:36 AM, wrote:
> Author: simonetripodi
> Date: Wed Dec 22 11:36:49 2010
> New Revision: 1051852
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1051852&view=rev
> Log:
> made classes fields volatile
> removed synchronization on getters/setters methods
>
> Modified:
>
>
> comm
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all mates,
> I'd like to propose a small stuff reorganization in the `impl` package
> that is growing up and we could arrange stuff in a cleaner way.
> I propose the following packages:
>
> org.apache.commons.pool2.impl
>
Hi Gary!
In the generic package would go the Generic(Keyed)ObjectPool and
related Configuration/Factory, and agreed, ref sounds better than
reference :)
What does anyone think about it?
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Gary Gr
On Dec 22, 2010, at 9:43, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all mates,
> I'd like to propose a small stuff reorganization in the `impl` package
> that is growing up and we could arrange stuff in a cleaner way.
> I propose the following packages:
>
> org.apache.commons.pool2.impl
>
What goes in the generic package?
Gary
On Dec 22, 2010, at 9:43, "Simone Tripodi" wrote:
> Hi all mates,
> I'd like to propose a small stuff reorganization in the `impl` package
> that is growing up and we could arrange stuff in a cleaner way.
> I propose the following packages:
>
> org.apache
On Dec 21, 2010, at 11:43 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>>
>>> But the RM should definitely *look at* the generated release notes and,
>> IMO, intentionally committing them is a good thing. Nothing generated
>> directly from maven has ever met my expectations in terms of formatting
>> and
>> conten
going to fix it now, thanks :)
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 3:53 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 22 December 2010 11:36, wrote:
>> Author: simonetripodi
>> Date: Wed Dec 22 11:36:49 2010
>> New Revision: 1051852
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apach
Hi Seb,
thanks a lot, there's always something to learn :)
Have a nice day,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 3:51 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 22 December 2010 11:52, wrote:
>> Author: simonetripodi
>> Date: Wed Dec 22 11:52:09 2010
>> New
On 22 December 2010 11:36, wrote:
> Author: simonetripodi
> Date: Wed Dec 22 11:36:49 2010
> New Revision: 1051852
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1051852&view=rev
> Log:
> made classes fields volatile
> removed synchronization on getters/setters methods
Need to remove whichever @Guard
On 22 December 2010 11:52, wrote:
> Author: simonetripodi
> Date: Wed Dec 22 11:52:09 2010
> New Revision: 1051863
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1051863&view=rev
> Log:
> made fields volatile
> removed synchronization on getters/setters methods
>
> Modified:
>
> commons/proper/poo
Hi all mates,
I'd like to propose a small stuff reorganization in the `impl` package
that is growing up and we could arrange stuff in a cleaner way.
I propose the following packages:
org.apache.commons.pool2.impl
| generic
On 22 December 2010 07:43, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:48 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>>> On 22 December 2010 00:11, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Ralph Goers
>>> > >> >wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> On Dec 21, 2010, at 2:55 PM,
18 matches
Mail list logo
