Re: [VFS] Maven 3.0.1?

2010-12-02 Thread Ralph Goers
It is very noisy but it works for me. I actually tried it before I voted to release 3.0.1 and just did an svn up and ran it again on my MacBook Pro. I've not tried the site plugin. I'm not planning on doing the vfs release with 3.0.1 though. Ralph On Dec 2, 2010, at 8:06 PM, Gary Gregory wrot

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-12-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-quartz (in module commons-jelly) failed

2010-12-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-quartz has an issue affecting its community integratio

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-12-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [math] max evaluations in new root solvers

2010-12-02 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hi. > > I think that the suggestion is to preserve the old signatures in 3.0, but > > have them not only be deprecated but also throw an error. This is an > > incompatible change that can't really be done in a point release. Simply > > removing the old signatures makes it harder to track down th

Re: [math] max evaluations in new root solvers

2010-12-02 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 02/12/2010 09:41, Ted Dunning a écrit : > I think that the suggestion is to preserve the old signatures in 3.0, but > have them not only be deprecated but also throw an error. This is an > incompatible change that can't really be done in a point release. Simply > removing the old signatures ma

RE: VFS release

2010-12-02 Thread Jörg Schaible
Gary Gregory wrote: > How about warnings like: > > Description ResourcePathLocationType > The serializable class FileNotFolderException does not declare a static > final serialVersionUID field of type long FileNotFolderException.java > /commons-vfs2/src/main/java/org/ap

RE: VFS release

2010-12-02 Thread Gary Gregory
How about warnings like: Description ResourcePathLocationType The serializable class FileNotFolderException does not declare a static final serialVersionUID field of type long FileNotFolderException.java /commons-vfs2/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/vfs2 li

Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-net (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-12-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2010-12-02, sebb wrote: > On 2 December 2010 11:10, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> This - and most other mvn built projects - fail during the current Gump >> run because the Maven repo returns an HTML page indicating a 404 error >> for the SHA1 checksums. >>

Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-net (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-12-02 Thread sebb
On 2 December 2010 11:10, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi, > > This - and most other mvn built projects - fail during the current Gump > run because the Maven repo returns an HTML page indicating a 404 error > for the SHA1 checksums. > >

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-javaflow (in module commons-sandbox) failed

2010-12-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-javaflow has an issue affecting its community integration. This is

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-12-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-vfs2 (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-12-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-vfs2 has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-vfs (in module commons-vfs-1.x) failed

2010-12-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-vfs has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-12-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-flatfile (in module commons-sandbox) failed

2010-12-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-flatfile has an issue affecting its community integration. This is

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-jexl (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-12-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jexl has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-email (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-12-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-email has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-lang3 (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-12-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-lang3 has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-net (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-12-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi, This - and most other mvn built projects - fail during the current Gump run because the Maven repo returns an HTML page indicating a 404 error for the SHA1 checksums. Maven seems to ignore the HTTP er

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-sanselan (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-12-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-sanselan has an issue affecting its community integration. This is

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-io-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-12-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-io-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This iss

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-functor (in module commons-sandbox) failed

2010-12-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-functor has an issue affecting its community integration. This iss

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-exec (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-12-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-exec has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-dbutils (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-12-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-dbutils has an issue affecting its community integration. This iss

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-collections4 (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-12-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-collections4 has an issue affecting its community integration. Thi

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-cli2 (in module commons-sandbox) failed

2010-12-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-cli2 has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-csv (in module commons-sandbox) failed

2010-12-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-csv has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-compress (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-12-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-compress has an issue affecting its community integration. This is

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-cli (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-12-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-cli has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-net (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-12-02 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-net has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

Re: [math] max evaluations in new root solvers

2010-12-02 Thread Ted Dunning
I think that the suggestion is to preserve the old signatures in 3.0, but have them not only be deprecated but also throw an error. This is an incompatible change that can't really be done in a point release. Simply removing the old signatures makes it harder to track down the problem. Preservin