On 11/2/10 10:05 AM, Steven Siebert wrote:
Hey all,
Sorry I've been away from the discussion, I was stuck in a building with no
windows for the last week (quite literally) and had very little time to
breath. At ApacheCon now, so have a bit of time to hack.
I caught up on the messages, and I ag
On 11/2/10 7:07 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Agree, we should be consistent with the JLS, so throwing exceptions in case
of overflow isn't the right thing to do.
"ArithmeticException" is currently used for that purpose in many methods of
"MathUtils".
For floating point values? Which methods?
> Agree, we should be consistent with the JLS, so throwing exceptions in case
> of overflow isn't the right thing to do.
"ArithmeticException" is currently used for that purpose in many methods of
"MathUtils".
Gilles
-
To unsu
Agree, we should be consistent with the JLS, so throwing exceptions in case
of overflow isn't the right thing to do.
Den 02/11/2010 22.06 skrev "Ted Dunning" :
exp(1000) is also not equal to infinity, but that is what the JVM returns.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Gilles Sadowski <
gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote:
> > > In "MathUtils", the documentation of method "factorialDouble" says that
> it
> > > will return INFINITY when the result is large
Note that VFS also runs on Continuum:
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/projectView.action?projectId=129
On 2 November 2010 20:10, Henning Schmiedehausen
wrote:
> To support a possible soon tag and build for commons vfs, I set up a
> CI build for the project at
> https://hudson.apache.org/huds
To support a possible soon tag and build for commons vfs, I set up a
CI build for the project at
https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/commons-vfs-trunk/
-h
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For addition
Just create one Jira for "multi-threading issues". Please go ahead and fix
them.
Ralph
On Nov 2, 2010, at 10:02 AM, sebb wrote:
> There are quite a few private instance fields that are not changed
> after construction, but which are not final.
>
> OK if I add the final qualifer to them?
>
>
On 11/2/10 1:16 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
In "MathUtils", the documentation of method "factorialDouble" says that it
will return INFINITY when the result is larger than MAX_VALUE. It also says
that this will happen when n> 170. So, I think that it should be more
appropriate to throw an "Arithm
> > In "MathUtils", the documentation of method "factorialDouble" says that it
> > will return INFINITY when the result is larger than MAX_VALUE. It also says
> > that this will happen when n > 170. So, I think that it should be more
> > appropriate to throw an "ArithmeticException" (as is done in
There are quite a few private instance fields that are not changed
after construction, but which are not final.
OK if I add the final qualifer to them?
Also, SoftRefFilesCache and DefaultFileMonitor use a boolean to
communicate between threads, but don't use synch.
Adding volatile would fix this.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On Nov 2, 2010, at 6:07 AM, Gilles Sadowski
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> In "MathUtils", the documentation of method "factorialDouble" says that it
> will return INFINITY when the result is larger than MAX_VALUE. It also says
> that this will happen when n > 170. So, I think that it should be more
Hey all,
Sorry I've been away from the discussion, I was stuck in a building with no
windows for the last week (quite literally) and had very little time to
breath. At ApacheCon now, so have a bit of time to hack.
I caught up on the messages, and I agree with Gary as well. What can I do
to help
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-email has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Hello.
In "MathUtils", the documentation of method "factorialDouble" says that it
will return INFINITY when the result is larger than MAX_VALUE. It also says
that this will happen when n > 170. So, I think that it should be more
appropriate to throw an "ArithmeticException" (as is done in the met
Hi all, Phil,
thanks for the explanations, very appreciated, I join Gary on saying
that maybe my thoughts on Pool are based on incorrect assumptions.
Assembling thought from various email and this thread IMHO starts
being a little difficult, If we could resume all that thoughts in a
wiki page I can
18 matches
Mail list logo
