To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
> -Original Message-
> From: Simone Tripodi [mailto:simone.trip...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 22:41
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [pool] Reusing Config
>
> Hi Gary!
> unfortunately the link replied with 404 code, can you give me please
> the issue ID?
It
Hi Gary!
unfortunately the link replied with 404 code, can you give me please
the issue ID?
Many thanks in advance, have a nice day!!!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> Hi Simone,
>
> Please see my exper
Hi Simone,
Please see my experiment in progress here
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12457710/pool2config.diff
Gary Gregory
Senior Software Engineer
Rocket Software
3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 820 • Atlanta, GA 30326 • USA
Tel: +1.404.760.1560
Email: ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com
Hi,
sorry for not having been clear, but in my previous email my intent
was saying that depending on how we manage the Config class, it could
influence de JMX support design, nothing more, and since I'm not
expert on JMX I was waiting for feedbacks from who knows more than me
About Gary's question
So I am doing an experimental refactoring to see what the code would look like
with a Config class extracted and I ran into the following.
The class GenericObjectPool has an _softMinEvictableIdleTimeMillis ivar but the
equivalent GenericKeyedObjectPool does not.
Is that a little hole in implem
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Siebert [mailto:smsi...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 12:51
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [pool] Reusing Config
>
> I apologize for not getting the proposal for the MBean API out quite yet -
> needed some sleep last night
I apologize for not getting the proposal for the MBean API out quite yet -
needed some sleep last night =)
Gary, it seems your question is more approaching the issue academically,
asking if the configuration can be extracted (indeed, abstracted) for reuse.
Depending on your intent, this may or ma
On Oct 20, 2010, at 2:25 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Am 20.10.2010 17:37, schrieb Stephen Colebourne:
>> Essentially, a more valid version is in [configuration] IIRC, but this
>> one remained because people didn't want to load another jar just for
>> this "simple functaionlity". All IIRC.
>
> The
Am 20.10.2010 17:37, schrieb Stephen Colebourne:
Essentially, a more valid version is in [configuration] IIRC, but this
one remained because people didn't want to load another jar just for
this "simple functaionlity". All IIRC.
The Javadocs of ExtendedProperties recommend using the
PropertiesC
sure, I always wait for feedbacks before coding :P Cool expression
"Rambo through the code", that was the first time I read it and made
me laugh :D
All the best,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> It seems
It seems to me there is a reason the code is the way it is so I'd really like
to hear thoughts from some of the original authors before we go and Rambo
through the code ;)
Gary
On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:13, "Simone Tripodi" wrote:
> Hi Gary,
> yes that's me that raised the question[1] and discus
Hi Gary,
yes that's me that raised the question[1] and discussed a little with
Seb. What blocked me was the JMX support proposal since I'm not
familiar with that technology, so I was consulting documentation to
study.
My very big +1 for that, with the wish of work directly on that stuff.
Anyone el
In the same department, I see the following ivars:
lifo : boolean
maxActive : int
maxIdle : int
maxTotal : int
maxWait : long
minEvictableIdleTimeMillis : long
minIdle : int
numTestsPerEvictionRun : int
testOnBorrow : boolean
testOnReturn : boolean
testWhileIdle : boolean
timeBetweenEvictionRunsMi
Hi All:
I think this came up recently. Any thoughts or plans on extracting the Config
class out of GenericKeyedObjectPool and GenericObjectPool so it can be reused.
The constants for default values could then also be moved to Config.
Gary Gregory
Senior Software Engineer
Rocket Software
3340 Pea
Essentially, a more valid version is in [configuration] IIRC, but this
one remained because people didn't want to load another jar just for
this "simple functaionlity". All IIRC.
Stephen
On 20 October 2010 16:32, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> On Oct 19, 2010, at 9:29 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> IMO, the Exte
On Oct 19, 2010, at 9:29 PM, sebb wrote:
> IMO, the ExtendedProperties class has rather odd behaviour.
>
> It is documented as an extension of normal Java properties, yet it
> allows Objects to be used as values:
>
> addProperty(String, Object)
> setProperty(String, Object)
>
> The save() meth
On Oct 19, 2010, at 1:14 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 19 October 2010 14:44, Matt Benson wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 19, 2010, at 7:00 AM, sebb wrote:
>>
>>> I'm trying to get my head round the generic signature of the
>>> decorate() method, for example in TransformedCollection:
>>>
>>> public static Collec
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On 20 October 2010 11:07, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 10/20/2010 10:50 AM, s...@apache.org wrote:
>>
>> Another recent update
>>
>> +* DAEMON-144: Drop sample dependency on Commons Collections
>> ExtendedProperties (1.0.4)
>
> Just wondering. Do we really need to list changes like that?
> From the rel
On 10/20/2010 10:38 AM, sebb wrote:
+981461,COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_3,/commons/proper/daemon/tags/COMMONS_DAEMON_1_0_3,tag
What's that about?
Can you explain why is this needed and for what purpose?
When you do a "Show History", such tags shows up in the display, so
you can easily see what chang
On 20 October 2010 05:38, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 10/20/2010 12:39 AM, s...@apache.org wrote:
>>
>> Author: sebb
>> Date: Tue Oct 19 22:39:58 2010
>> New Revision: 102
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=102&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Add 1.0.3 tag marker
>>
>> Modified:
>> commons/pr
> -Original Message-
> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 01:35
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VFS] Build problem
>
> On 20 October 2010 04:53, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com
On 20 October 2010 04:53, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 04:11
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Subject: Re: [VFS] Build problem
>>
>> Mvn site works OK for me with Maven 2.2.1, but you may need to run m
25 matches
Mail list logo
