Re: [VFS] Build problem

2010-10-19 Thread Ralph Goers
On Oct 19, 2010, at 9:44 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > On Oct 19, 2010, at 8:53 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > >>> -Original Message- >>> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 04:11 >>> To: Commons Developers List >>> Subject: Re: [VFS] Build problem >>> >>>

Re: [VFS] Build problem

2010-10-19 Thread Ralph Goers
On Oct 19, 2010, at 8:53 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 04:11 >> To: Commons Developers List >> Subject: Re: [VFS] Build problem >> >> Mvn site works OK for me with Maven 2.2.1, but you may need to

RE: [VFS] Build problem

2010-10-19 Thread Gary Gregory
> -Original Message- > From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 04:11 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [VFS] Build problem > > Mvn site works OK for me with Maven 2.2.1, but you may need to run mvn > install once first. That did it. I just ran "mv

[COLLECTIONS] ExtendedProperties oddities

2010-10-19 Thread sebb
IMO, the ExtendedProperties class has rather odd behaviour. It is documented as an extension of normal Java properties, yet it allows Objects to be used as values: addProperty(String, Object) setProperty(String, Object) The save() method ignores anything but String and List, so it won't save suc

Re: [DAEMON] Releasing 1.0.4

2010-10-19 Thread Mladen Turk
On 10/19/2010 08:54 PM, sebb wrote: DAEMON-173 is not marked as completed - was SVN update r997218 incomplete? Or is it just a question of resolving the JIRA issue? Right, I missed that. Closed now. I've updated the RN for the other JIRA issues that were missing. Cool. Regards -- ^TM

Re: [DAEMON] Releasing 1.0.4

2010-10-19 Thread sebb
On 19 October 2010 18:58, sebb wrote: > On 19 October 2010 17:17, Mladen Turk wrote: >> Hi, >> >> A substantial amount of fixes and few neat features >> have been added recently, so release early, release often ... >> >> Note that some new features are not documented yet, but >> IMO this can be d

Re: [COLLECTIONS] TransformedCollection generic signature seems wrong

2010-10-19 Thread sebb
On 19 October 2010 14:44, Matt Benson wrote: > > On Oct 19, 2010, at 7:00 AM, sebb wrote: > >> I'm trying to get my head round the generic signature of the >> decorate() method, for example in TransformedCollection: >> >> public static Collection decorate(Collection coll, >> Transformer transform

Re: [DAEMON] Releasing 1.0.4

2010-10-19 Thread sebb
On 19 October 2010 17:17, Mladen Turk wrote: > Hi, > > A substantial amount of fixes and few neat features > have been added recently, so release early, release often ... > > Note that some new features are not documented yet, but > IMO this can be done later. > It's not like we have a completed d

RE: [DAEMON] Releasing 1.0.4

2010-10-19 Thread Gary Gregory
> -Original Message- > From: Mladen Turk [mailto:mt...@apache.org] > Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 09:18 > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: [DAEMON] Releasing 1.0.4 > > Hi, > > A substantial amount of fixes and few neat features > have been added recently, so release early

[DAEMON] Releasing 1.0.4

2010-10-19 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi, A substantial amount of fixes and few neat features have been added recently, so release early, release often ... Note that some new features are not documented yet, but IMO this can be done later. It's not like we have a completed documentation anyhow, so that would be targeted for 1.0.5.

Re: [COLLECTIONS] TransformedCollection generic signature seems wrong

2010-10-19 Thread Matt Benson
On Oct 19, 2010, at 7:00 AM, sebb wrote: > I'm trying to get my head round the generic signature of the > decorate() method, for example in TransformedCollection: > > public static Collection decorate(Collection coll, > Transformer transformer) > > This does not seem to allow one to transform

Re: [pool] runtime re-configuration

2010-10-19 Thread Simone Tripodi
Well done Steven, I'll take a look at the patch this evening (my timezone in GMT+2) if someone else is not faster than me :) Thanks, Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Steven Siebert wrote: > Sounds like there is a fair amount

[COLLECTIONS] TransformedCollection generic signature seems wrong

2010-10-19 Thread sebb
I'm trying to get my head round the generic signature of the decorate() method, for example in TransformedCollection: public static Collection decorate(Collection coll, Transformer transformer) This does not seem to allow one to transform String into Integer (or vice-versa) without ignoring type

Re: [pool] runtime re-configuration

2010-10-19 Thread Steven Siebert
Sounds like there is a fair amount of interest in the MBean approach. I created a JIRA ticket on this enhancement (#POOL-172). I believe there are some similarities between this and #POOL-159and #POOL-9

Re: [VFS] Build problem

2010-10-19 Thread sebb
Mvn site works OK for me with Maven 2.2.1, but you may need to run mvn install once first. On 19 October 2010 04:42, Gary Gregory wrote: > Ugh! We need an expert! :) > > Gary > >> -Original Message- >> From: jcar...@carmanconsulting.com [mailto:jcar...@carmanconsulting.com] On >> Behalf

Re: [pool] runtime re-configuration

2010-10-19 Thread Phil Steitz
On 10/19/10 1:45 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: +1, I like the idea of using MBeans too! +1 - the Tomcat jdbc-pool code has the beginnings of this. Phil Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Matt Benson wrote: On Oct 18, 2010

Re: [VFS] Build problem

2010-10-19 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi James, James Carman wrote: > I have version 1024102, but the mvn site fails for me, too (I'm > running maven 3.0) . Here's the output: > > [INFO] Scanning for projects... > [WARNING] > [WARNING] Some problems were encountered while building the effective > model for org.apache.commons:common