RE: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on RC3

I am looking around and I notice set of class names that are IMO incorrectly camel-cased: Filesystem* should be FileSystem because "filesystem" is not a word in English. Gary Gregory Senior Software Engineer Rocket Software 3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 820 . Atlanta, GA 30326 . USA Tel: +1.404.760

Re: [POOL] can the CheckedObjectPool be removed when introducing Java5 generics?

Thanks for your feedback Matt, maybe I got blind because of the generics strong typing, but it would make sense in he scenario when an existing ObjectPool instance doesn't expose the raw type. Thanks, Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 5

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on RC4

On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > I do not understand warnings "Expected @throws tag for 'EOFException'." in: > > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-2.0-rc4/site/checkstyle.html > > when the Javadocs look right. > > It must be missing something obvious... The methods declar

Re: Releasing Daemon 1.0.4

On 10/09/2010 02:57 PM, Nick Griffiths wrote: Done! Daemon-177 - https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ManageAttachments.jspa?id=12476921 Let me know if you want some changes made to it, or whether I've missed the point somewhere. You have made java code 1.4 dependent by using Throwable.get

RE: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on RC4

Oh, but I am looking at trunk code, not the actual source... Gary Gregory Senior Software Engineer Rocket Software 3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 820 . Atlanta, GA 30326 . USA Tel: +1.404.760.1560 . Mobile: +1.310.403.8747 Email: ggreg...@seagullsoftware.com Web: seagull.rocketsoftware.com  -O

RE: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on RC4

I do not understand warnings "Expected @throws tag for 'EOFException'." in: http://people.apache.org/~niallp/io-2.0-rc4/site/checkstyle.html when the Javadocs look right. It must be missing something obvious... Gary Gregory Senior Software Engineer Rocket Software 3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 820

[VOTE] Release commons-exec-1.1 based on RC1

Hi folks, I would like to call a vote for releasing commons-exec-1.1 based on RC1. Below you find the RC coordinates Cheers, Siegfried Goeschl Tag: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/exec/tags/COMMONS_EXEC_1_1_RC1 Site: http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/exec/1.1/RC1/s

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on RC4

Build works fine on Windows 7 on Java 1.5 (both maven and ant). Artifacts and site look good. +1 Oliver Am 10.10.2010 16:59, schrieb Niall Pemberton: I have prepared Commons IO 2.0 RC4. The main change since RC4 was to fix the Ant build The RC3 changes were improvements to some tests which w

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on RC4

Le 10/10/2010 16:59, Niall Pemberton a écrit : > I have prepared Commons IO 2.0 RC4. The main change since RC4 was to > fix the Ant build > > The RC3 changes were improvements to some tests which were causing > intermittent failures in Gump & Continuum and JavaDoc improvements. > For details about

(math] Percentile performance improvement

Hi all, The new implementation of Percentile improving performances has been checked in. It should solve issue . As discussed here, the implementation is based on a selection algorithm instead of a complete sort. A setData method has also been added

Re: [POOL] can the CheckedObjectPool be removed when introducing Java5 generics?

On Oct 10, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all pool team, > I've been working on introducing generics in the pool on trunk, I > noticed the CheckedObjectPool could lose its power when the pool will > use the generics. I don't work on [pool], but I would think that there would be a h

[VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on RC4

I have prepared Commons IO 2.0 RC4. The main change since RC4 was to fix the Ant build The RC3 changes were improvements to some tests which were causing intermittent failures in Gump & Continuum and JavaDoc improvements. For details about Continuum builds/failures, see: http://people.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on RC3

Apologies, this vote is cancelled. I'll roll another RC to fix the issue Gary found in the Ant build. Niall On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 5:30 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > I have prepared Commons IO 2.0 RC3. The main changes since RC2 are > improvements to some tests which were causing intermittent f

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on RC3

On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hi All: > > Is the ant build still supported? I get: > > BUILD FAILED > C:\temp\commons-io-2.0-src\commons-io-2.0-src\build.xml:184: Test > org.apache.commons.io.monitor.AbstractMonitorTestCase failed >        at > org.apache.tools.ant.taskd

[POOL] can the CheckedObjectPool be removed when introducing Java5 generics?

Hi all pool team, I've been working on introducing generics in the pool on trunk, I noticed the CheckedObjectPool could lose its power when the pool will use the generics. So, can this class (and relative static methods) be removed from PoolUtils[1], or do you have suggestions why/how to maintain i

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

RE: [VOTE] Release Commons IO 2.0 based on RC3

Hi All: Is the ant build still supported? I get: BUILD FAILED C:\temp\commons-io-2.0-src\commons-io-2.0-src\build.xml:184: Test org.apache.commons.io.monitor.AbstractMonitorTestCase failed at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTask.actOnTestResult(JUnitTask.java:1863)