Lets continue on the user list if needed. Response inline below.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Michael musset wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i would like to do that :
>
>
>
>
>
>
> and be able to get what's is inside the CDATA balise from this :
>
> public class protocol implements
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=770&projectId=127
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Fri 1 Oct 2010 03:36:34 +
Finished at: Fri 1 Oct 2010 03:37:00 +
Total time: 25s
Build Trigger: Sched
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=761&projectId=82
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Fri 1 Oct 2010 03:29:50 +
Finished at: Fri 1 Oct 2010 03:29:55 +
Total time: 5s
Build Trigger: Schedul
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=748&projectId=65
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Fri 1 Oct 2010 03:20:03 +
Finished at: Fri 1 Oct 2010 03:22:28 +
Total time: 2m 25s
Build Trigger: Sch
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=744&projectId=97
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Fri 1 Oct 2010 02:42:24 +
Finished at: Fri 1 Oct 2010 02:42:48 +
Total time: 24s
Build Trigger: Forced
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=731&projectId=108
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Fri 1 Oct 2010 02:31:52 +
Finished at: Fri 1 Oct 2010 02:35:38 +
Total time: 3m 45s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=724&projectId=97
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Fri 1 Oct 2010 02:24:30 +
Finished at: Fri 1 Oct 2010 02:25:01 +
Total time: 30s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build Number:
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=718&projectId=82
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Fri 1 Oct 2010 02:19:15 +
Finished at: Fri 1 Oct 2010 02:19:22 +
Total time: 6s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build Numb
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=715&projectId=79
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Fri 1 Oct 2010 02:17:17 +
Finished at: Fri 1 Oct 2010 02:17:27 +
Total time: 10s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build Number:
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=710&projectId=73
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Fri 1 Oct 2010 02:15:18 +
Finished at: Fri 1 Oct 2010 02:15:29 +
Total time: 10s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build Number:
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=708&projectId=71
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Fri 1 Oct 2010 02:11:02 +
Finished at: Fri 1 Oct 2010 02:12:54 +
Total time: 1m 52s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build Numb
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=703&projectId=65
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Fri 1 Oct 2010 02:06:49 +
Finished at: Fri 1 Oct 2010 02:09:12 +
Total time: 2m 22s
Build Trigger: Forced
Build
>
> There are still a few private immutable fields which have yet to be
> made final - see example below
>
> I can fix those, or do you want me to create a JIRA and patch for them?
No problem, I'll do another pass for the "final" keyword.
> [...]
>
> Also, there are still (deprecated) setters
We should add these methods to the interfaces in the 3.0 branch.
On Sep 30, 2010, at 9:47 AM, Gilles Sadowski
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> In package "distribution", the methods related to sampling are defined in
> the abstract classes ("Abstract{Continuous|Integer}Distribution") but not
> declared in
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:25 AM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
>
> But keeping it simple here means leaving out any thread stuff and
> leaving it as a simple Runnable implementation. The more you include
> and hide, the more you reduce flexibility.
>
+1! What's with this obsession over holding the use
On 30 September 2010 13:55, wrote:
> Author: erans
> Date: Thu Sep 30 12:55:02 2010
> New Revision: 1003048
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1003048&view=rev
> Log:
> ade all distribution classes immutable (as per the conclusion of MATH-349).
There are still a few private immutable fiel
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 4:11 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 30 September 2010 12:06, James Carman wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 7:01 AM, sebb wrote:
>>>
>>> OK.
>>>
>>> So how about allowing the user to pass in an Executor when creating
>>> the instance?
>>> Would that be sufficient?
>>>
>>
>> KISS.
On 30 September 2010 12:06, James Carman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 7:01 AM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> OK.
>>
>> So how about allowing the user to pass in an Executor when creating
>> the instance?
>> Would that be sufficient?
>>
>
> KISS. Why add complexity here if it's not needed? Leaving it as
Hi.
In package "distribution", the methods related to sampling are defined in
the abstract classes ("Abstract{Continuous|Integer}Distribution") but not
declared in the corresponding interfaces ("{Continuous|Integer}Distribution").
Is it intended or can I make them visible at the interface level?
Hi all,
and sorry again to be late, but unfortunately I've some work that has
to be deployed asap that's driving me crazy :P
About the site fix, I'd really appreciate if someone could help me,
for next releases I'll move the guide under a proper dir so it will be
easier to prevent errors. Thanks i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-javaflow has an issue affecting its community integration.
This is
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 12:06 PM, James Carman
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 7:01 AM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> OK.
>>
>> So how about allowing the user to pass in an Executor when creating
>> the instance?
>> Would that be sufficient?
>>
>
> KISS. Why add complexity here if it's not needed? Leaving
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 7:01 AM, sebb wrote:
>
> OK.
>
> So how about allowing the user to pass in an Executor when creating
> the instance?
> Would that be sufficient?
>
KISS. Why add complexity here if it's not needed? Leaving it as a
Runnable allows the user to choose how to run it.
---
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On 30 September 2010 06:39, Julien Aymé wrote:
> 2010/9/30 sebb :
>> On 30 September 2010 02:58, Niall Pemberton
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:46 AM, sebb wrote:
Just wondering if the Tailer API could be simplified by performing the
thread start within the class?
Is it
26 matches
Mail list logo
