Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=674&projectId=83
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Wed 29 Sep 2010 02:20:39 +
Finished at: Wed 29 Sep 2010 02:23:20 +
Total time: 2m 41s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=667&projectId=83
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Tue 28 Sep 2010 22:33:14 +
Finished at: Tue 28 Sep 2010 22:35:14 +
Total time: 2m 0s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build N
On 09/28/2010 04:29 PM, Nick Griffiths wrote:
I asked a question on the list the other week about the fail method not
being callable during startup - any idea? I've got a patch ready...
Open a JIRA issue and attach the patch.
Patches *are* welcome :)
Regards
--
^TM
On 28 September 2010 16:18, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 28/09/2010 16:56, sebb a écrit :
>> On 28 September 2010 15:42, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>> Le 28/09/2010 16:25, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
>
> It seems some recent changes break compilation. Not in this specific
> set, but probably on
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:13 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 28 September 2010 15:46, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Simone Tripodi
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all guys,
>>> first of all thanks everybody mentored me during the path of the 2.1
>>> release, especially Rahul and Sebastian, al
Le 28/09/2010 16:56, sebb a écrit :
> On 28 September 2010 15:42, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Le 28/09/2010 16:25, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
It seems some recent changes break compilation. Not in this specific
set, but probably one of the previous ones from today or yesterday.
>>>
>>> B
On 28 September 2010 15:46, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
>> Hi all guys,
>> first of all thanks everybody mentored me during the path of the 2.1
>> release, especially Rahul and Sebastian, always ready to provide a
>> valid help, I appreciate it
On 28 September 2010 15:42, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 28/09/2010 16:25, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
>>>
>>> It seems some recent changes break compilation. Not in this specific
>>> set, but probably one of the previous ones from today or yesterday.
>>
>> Break compilation?
>> "mvn clean site" produc
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> first of all thanks everybody mentored me during the path of the 2.1
> release, especially Rahul and Sebastian, always ready to provide a
> valid help, I appreciate it very much :)
>
> I'd like to discuss with you what I'd li
Le 28/09/2010 16:25, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
>>
>> It seems some recent changes break compilation. Not in this specific
>> set, but probably one of the previous ones from today or yesterday.
>
> Break compilation?
> "mvn clean site" produces a "BUILD SUCCESSFUL" here.
>
>> The problems are some
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Gilles Sadowski
wrote:
>>
>> It seems some recent changes break compilation. Not in this specific
>> set, but probably one of the previous ones from today or yesterday.
>
> Break compilation?
> "mvn clean site" produces a "BUILD SUCCESSFUL" here.
>
>> The problems
I asked a question on the list the other week about the fail method not
being callable during startup - any idea? I've got a patch ready...
Previous message:
Hi list,
I've been looking at this fail method on DaemonController and it looks
like it is for giving a slightly friendlier error messag
>
> It seems some recent changes break compilation. Not in this specific
> set, but probably one of the previous ones from today or yesterday.
Break compilation?
"mvn clean site" produces a "BUILD SUCCESSFUL" here.
> The problems are some @Override annotations in BetaDistributionImpl
> (getAlpha
Le 28/09/2010 14:38, er...@apache.org a écrit :
> Author: erans
> Date: Tue Sep 28 12:38:09 2010
> New Revision: 1002145
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1002145&view=rev
> Log:
> Removed deprecated code.
>
> Modified:
>
> commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/m
On 09/27/2010 06:57 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 27.09.2010 17:45, sebb wrote:
At least i would be interested as well :)
Here you'll find a README.txt for assembling the
custom VC installation that uses DDK 7.1
Well, Still needs Platform SDK for 2003r2 and
VS 2003 (There are no CRT .obj files fo
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-javaflow has an issue affecting its community integration.
This is
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-io-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This iss
19 matches
Mail list logo
