On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> on behalf of the Digester committers I'd like to invite you to vote
> the 2.1 release of the commons-digester, based on the RC2
>
> -
>
> [X] +1 release it
> [ ] +0 OK,
On 19 September 2010 09:55, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> on behalf of the Digester committers I'd like to invite you to vote
> the 2.1 release of the commons-digester, based on the RC2
>
> Tag:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/digester/tags/DIGESTER_2_1_RC2/
>
> Releas
Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> on behalf of the Digester committers I'd like to invite you to vote
> the 2.1 release of the commons-digester, based on the RC2
>
> Tag:
>
>
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/digester/tags/DIGESTER_2_1_RC2/
>
> Release notes:
>
> http://peo
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> I had just had that thought this morning: that in particular, only a
> delegating type proxy, an Interceptor proxy in [proxy] speak, would be
> subject to the condition James outline where an interceptor proxy and its
> target should *no
On Sep 21, 2010, at 2:23 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Matt and James,
>
> Matt Benson wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 20, 2010, at 6:11 PM, James Carman wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Matt Benson
>>> wrote:
This would seem quite complicated to execute, would it not?
>
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-javaflow has an issue affecting its community integration.
This is
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On 21 September 2010 09:40, Mikkel Meyer Andersen wrote:
> 2010/9/21 Luc Maisonobe :
>> Le 21/09/2010 10:08, Mikkel Meyer Andersen a écrit :
>>> 2010/9/21 Luc Maisonobe :
Le 21/09/2010 09:26, Mikkel Meyer Andersen a écrit :
>> Here is an extract from the answer from Pierre L'Ecuyer:
>
> [...]
> >
> > They do not use this kind of tricks in their implementation. By using
> > them in ours, it would make more clear our code is really an original
> > one and not derived from their GPL code.
> It sounds reasonable, but I'm thinking that it might be better to add
> the current code, an
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-io-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This iss
2010/9/21 Luc Maisonobe :
> Le 21/09/2010 10:08, Mikkel Meyer Andersen a écrit :
>> 2010/9/21 Luc Maisonobe :
>>> Le 21/09/2010 09:26, Mikkel Meyer Andersen a écrit :
> Here is an extract from the answer from Pierre L'Ecuyer:
>
> Our code can be released under either a GPL or a commerc
Le 21/09/2010 10:08, Mikkel Meyer Andersen a écrit :
> 2010/9/21 Luc Maisonobe :
>> Le 21/09/2010 09:26, Mikkel Meyer Andersen a écrit :
Here is an extract from the answer from Pierre L'Ecuyer:
Our code can be released under either a GPL or a commercial license.
>>> Well, what about
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=571&projectId=108
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Tue 21 Sep 2010 08:20:48 +
Finished at: Tue 21 Sep 2010 08:25:29 +
Total time: 4m 40s
Build Trigger: Schedule
B
2010/9/21 Luc Maisonobe :
> Le 21/09/2010 09:26, Mikkel Meyer Andersen a écrit :
>>> Here is an extract from the answer from Pierre L'Ecuyer:
>>>
>>> Our code can be released under either a GPL or a commercial license.
>> Well, what about the Apache License then?
>
> It is their code and I did not
Le 21/09/2010 09:26, Mikkel Meyer Andersen a écrit :
>> Here is an extract from the answer from Pierre L'Ecuyer:
>>
>> Our code can be released under either a GPL or a commercial license.
> Well, what about the Apache License then?
It is their code and I did not use it. The main point is we
reimp
> Here is an extract from the answer from Pierre L'Ecuyer:
>
> Our code can be released under either a GPL or a commercial license.
Well, what about the Apache License then?
> There is also a Java implementation with multiple streams and
> substreams in SSJ: see the package rng:
> http://www.i
Hi Matt and James,
Matt Benson wrote:
>
> On Sep 20, 2010, at 6:11 PM, James Carman wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Matt Benson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> This would seem quite complicated to execute, would it not?
>>>
>>
>> What do you propose?
>>
>
> I don't know for sure yet. My i
Thanks for the test. I give a +1 fir this (with the already mentioned
"but"'s like documentation etc.). Inclusion would also make it easier
for others to test it a bit.
2010/9/21 Luc Maisonobe :
> Le 20/09/2010 15:28, Mikkel Meyer Andersen a écrit :
>
>> I would like to see/try a comparison betwee
Le 20/09/2010 14:40, Phil Steitz a écrit :
> On 9/20/10 6:30 AM, luc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
>> The paper does not put any restriction on the algorithm. The
>> reference implementation in C on the other hand is limited to
>> non-commercial use only. In my implementation, I did not refer to
>> thi
20 matches
Mail list logo
