Re: [Digester] working toward a release

2010-09-01 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all, just to give you a brief recap of the completed actions: - tests have been migrated to JUnit 4; - project structure has been moved to default Maven archetype structure; - ant build & config have been removed; - whole documentation has been moved to site, in the xdoc format. There still is

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-javaflow (in module commons-sandbox) failed

2010-09-01 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-javaflow has an issue affecting its community integration. This is

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-09-01 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-09-01 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-io-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-09-01 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-io-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This iss

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons - Commons JCI - Continue test if possible; use Java 1.5

2010-09-01 Thread contin...@vmbuild
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=336&projectId=108 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous Build: No previous build. Started at: Wed 1 Sep 2010 17:40:36 + Finished at: Wed 1 Sep 2010 17:44:06 + Total time: 3m 30s Build Trigger: Fo

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons - Commons JCI - Continue test if possible; use Java 1.5

2010-09-01 Thread contin...@vmbuild
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=335&projectId=108 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Wed 1 Sep 2010 17:36:29 + Finished at: Wed 1 Sep 2010 17:39:51 + Total time: 3m 22s Build Trigger: Forced Build

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons - Commons JCI - Continue test if possible

2010-09-01 Thread contin...@vmbuild
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=334&projectId=108 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Wed 1 Sep 2010 16:20:40 + Finished at: Wed 1 Sep 2010 16:24:07 + Total time: 3m 27s Build Trigger: Schedule Bui

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-io-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-09-01 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-io-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This iss

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons - Commons JCI - Continue test if possible

2010-09-01 Thread contin...@vmbuild
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=333&projectId=108 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Wed 1 Sep 2010 15:20:48 + Finished at: Wed 1 Sep 2010 15:24:18 + Total time: 3m 30s Build Trigger: Schedule Bui

Re: [sanselan] project dead?

2010-09-01 Thread Charles Matthew Chen
Hi Damjan, When your patch(es) are ready, I will be happy to review them. Charles Matthew Chen On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Torsten Curdt wrote: >> SVN is not like Git or or Mercurial, it doesn't allow you to develop a >> decentralized patchset of small independent patches that apply seq

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons - Commons JCI - Continue test if possible

2010-09-01 Thread contin...@vmbuild
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=330&projectId=108 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous Build: No previous build. Started at: Wed 1 Sep 2010 14:28:00 + Finished at: Wed 1 Sep 2010 14:31:53 + Total time: 3m 53s Build Trigger: Fo

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons - Commons JCI - Default Maven 2 Build Definition

2010-09-01 Thread contin...@vmbuild
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=328&projectId=108 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Wed 1 Sep 2010 13:29:39 + Finished at: Wed 1 Sep 2010 13:33:06 + Total time: 3m 26s Build Trigger: Forced Build

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons - Commons JCI - Default Maven 2 Build Definition

2010-09-01 Thread contin...@vmbuild
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=327&projectId=108 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Wed 1 Sep 2010 13:21:04 + Finished at: Wed 1 Sep 2010 13:27:01 + Total time: 5m 56s Build Trigger: Schedule Bui

[Math] Point 13 in MATH-413

2010-09-01 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Referring to MATH-413: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-413 I think that point 13 is the easiest to solve. Please let me know whether you agree on the proposed change. Gilles - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr.

Re: [Math] Deprecation in 2.2 (Was: svn commit: r990792 [1/5] - ...)

2010-09-01 Thread Ted Dunning
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:51 AM, Gilles Sadowski < gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> wrote: > > [...] > > > > The x.9 release can be viewed as a bridge release ... your code will > > probably run and if you get rid of deprecation warnings > > moving to the next .0 release will be very easy. > > This is

Re: [Math] Deprecation in 2.2 (Was: svn commit: r990792 [1/5] - ...)

2010-09-01 Thread Gilles Sadowski
> [...] > > The x.9 release can be viewed as a bridge release ... your code will > probably run and if you get rid of deprecation warnings > moving to the next .0 release will be very easy. This is probably the nicest way but I'm afraid that with the changes proposed in CM, it would require a huge

Re: [Digester] working toward a release

2010-09-01 Thread Simone Tripodi
Unfortunately they are just components mocks used in proper unit tests, they don't contain test methods, so 1) should be the better solution. Thanks Seb! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 12:50 PM, sebb wrote: > On 1 September 2010 09:2

Re: [Digester] working toward a release

2010-09-01 Thread sebb
On 1 September 2010 09:24, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi guys, > migrating to Junit4 I met a small issue that can be easily resolved in > more that 1 way, I'd like to discuss with you how we want doing it: > > Tests in error: >  initializationError(org.apache.commons.digester.xmlrules.TestDigesterRul

Re: [sanselan] project dead?

2010-09-01 Thread Torsten Curdt
> SVN is not like Git or or Mercurial, it doesn't allow you to develop a > decentralized patchset of small independent patches that apply sequentially > after each other and then send it through to an issue. Currently my patch is > at 1368 lines in 46 kB, and still growing - this takes a good while

Re: [sanselan] project dead?

2010-09-01 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Thank you Christian. SVN is not like Git or or Mercurial, it doesn't allow you to develop a decentralized patchset of small independent patches that apply sequentially after each other and then send it through to an issue. Currently my patch is at 1368 lines in 46 kB, and still growing - this take

Re: [Digester] working toward a release

2010-09-01 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi guys, migrating to Junit4 I met a small issue that can be easily resolved in more that 1 way, I'd like to discuss with you how we want doing it: Tests in error: initializationError(org.apache.commons.digester.xmlrules.TestDigesterRulesSource) initializationError(org.apache.commons.digester

Re: [sanselan] project dead?

2010-09-01 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Hello Damjan, i think that the Sanselan developers will welcome your patches. Once they arrived, somebody will have a little time to apply them, I would guess. Before you continue, I would like to suggest you these links: * http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html * http://commons.apach