Thanks for you job :-)
2010/8/18 Rahul Akolkar
> I filled out both surveys today.
>
> -Rahul
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>
I filled out both surveys today.
-Rahul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Hi Ted:
Thanks for your reply.
The first 5 failing test is due to a null value in the top level (when
constructing the object), though
not in the argument place. The test case generated by the tool reveals a
corner case like:
Closure var0 = null;
Closure[] var1 = new Closure[]{var0};
ChainedClo
But it looks to me like you have null values embedded in the inputs.
I think the same would happen if you called Arrays.sort and some of the
objects in the array being sorted were null.
Why do you think that non-nullity of the top level arguments is all that
matters?
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:30
Please find it in the following url:
http://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B_sGdVRvWdcXOGRhYmZkZjctODJhZS00Nzg5LThkN2EtMzZjZGY5ZjIyNTRk&hl=en&authkey=COXhhb8F
It should be accessible.
thanks
-Sai
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Attachments are stripped. Can you put the repor
Attachments are stripped. Can you put the reports onto a web-site?
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Sai Zhang wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> I am now writing an automated test generation tool for Java, and use Apache
> Common Collections
> version 3.2 (latest release) as one of the experimental benchmark
On 2010-08-17, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> On 2010-08-17, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2010-08-16, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> For the two scxml test failures, there is no such usage
Am 16.08.2010 22:55, schrieb Stefan Bodewig:
On 2010-08-16, Oliver Heger wrote:
Am 16.08.2010 22:03, schrieb Stefan Bodewig:
On 2010-08-16, Oliver Heger wrote:
Does anybody have an idea what breaks Gump? Looks as if multiple
projects are affected.
An idea, yes, but didn't have time to an
Hi all:
I am now writing an automated test generation tool for Java, and use Apache
Common Collections
version 3.2 (latest release) as one of the experimental benchmarks.
According to the tool design and its internal checking mechanism, it
generates many failing tests.
I attach 10 (executable fa
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2010-08-17, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>>> On 2010-08-16, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>
For the two scxml test failures, there is no such usage. I think I'll
let things settle som
Thanks a lot! :) Feel free to contact me whenever you need for clarifications.
All the best,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:15 AM, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
>> Hi Rahul,
>> th
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Jacob Beard wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For those who are interested, I've written a blog post describing the status
> of my Google Summer of Code project:
> http://blog.echo-flow.com/2010/08/16/google-summer-of-code-2010-final-update/
>
Post was useful, thanks. I have
On 2010-08-17, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> On 2010-08-16, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>>> For the two scxml test failures, there is no such usage. I think I'll
>>> let things settle some before taking a look.
>> No, for scxml things are different.
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 4:15 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi Rahul,
> this mail just as a reminder since you told me there was no problem at
> all on ping you :) Can we plan in a short-therm a review on this?
Yes, thats no problem at all, sometimes even necessary. I will try to
get to this within
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2010-08-16, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>
>> For the two scxml test failures, there is no such usage. I think I'll
>> let things settle some before taking a look.
>
> No, for scxml things are different. Until last week Gump didn't build
> scxml
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-io-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This iss
On 17 August 2010 12:27, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:10 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> BTW, I note that fileupload [1] does not contain the bin and src
>> archives, whereas compress 1.0 [2] does.
>
> That's coincidentally because I wasn't able to use Nexus at the time.
That cannot b
On 17 August 2010 12:27, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:10 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> BTW, I note that fileupload [1] does not contain the bin and src
>> archives, whereas compress 1.0 [2] does.
>
> That's coincidentally because I wasn't able to use Nexus at the time.
That cannot b
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:10 PM, sebb wrote:
> BTW, I note that fileupload [1] does not contain the bin and src
> archives, whereas compress 1.0 [2] does.
That's coincidentally because I wasn't able to use Nexus at the time.
Jochen
--
I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye)
--
On 17 August 2010 12:03, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>
>> My preference is currently not to remove the unnecessary files and let
>> stay complete
>
> I wouldn't even bet that's possible. In particular, I never tried.
Yes, you can remove
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> My preference is currently not to remove the unnecessary files and let
> stay complete
I wouldn't even bet that's possible. In particular, I never tried.
Jochen
--
I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye)
>> Which means:
>> 1) I will copy it to apache dist from my local box to people
>> 2) push the release button on nexus
>
> You're free to do so. My personal procedure is to use "wget -np -r
> " to copy the files from the repository to the dist folder on
> people.apache.org. Some shifting and removi
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:52 PM, sebb wrote:
> I'm surprised that the non-Maven archives end up in Nexus.
> Is there some pom magic that somehow attaches them to the deploy target?
In the case of commons-parent, search for "maven-assembly-plugin" on
http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/
On 17 August 2010 11:43, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Christian Grobmeier
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Interesting... were is this content from? Has this been grabbed by
>>> nexus automatically?
>>
>> That's what we had been discussing initially. The projects I am aware
>>
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Which means:
> 1) I will copy it to apache dist from my local box to people
> 2) push the release button on nexus
You're free to do so. My personal procedure is to use "wget -np -r
" to copy the files from the repository to the dist
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Christian Grobmeier
> wrote:
>
>> Interesting... were is this content from? Has this been grabbed by
>> nexus automatically?
>
> That's what we had been discussing initially. The projects I am aware
> of are building the source and binary distributions as part o
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> Interesting... were is this content from? Has this been grabbed by
> nexus automatically?
That's what we had been discussing initially. The projects I am aware
of are building the source and binary distributions as part of the
Maven
>> 1) copy the released artifacts to the dist directory
>> (/x1/www/www.apache.org/dist/commons) on people.apache.org
> Wasn't that step 1 in your list?
Yes but I cannot find the place from which I can copy from Nexus to
the dist folder.
I searched whole people server... so, where are the nexus a
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> 1) copy the released artifacts to the dist directory
> (/x1/www/www.apache.org/dist/commons) on people.apache.org
> 2) delete the old release from the dist directory (it's archived)
> 3) login to https://repository.apache.org with your
Hi Rahul,
this mail just as a reminder since you told me there was no problem at
all on ping you :) Can we plan in a short-therm a review on this?
Thanks in advance, have a nice day,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Simone Tri
30 matches
Mail list logo
