Hello,
Commons Compress 1.1 RC2 is available - please vote :-)
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/compress/tags/commons-compress-1.1/
Site:
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/compress/1.1/RC2/
Binaries:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommon
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-vfs-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This is
Torsten Curdt wrote:
>>> I feel kind of the opposite -- RAT is an important tool that's required
>>> of all the Incubator projects, but pretty widely integrated (at least in
>>> Java land) outside of the Incubator as a tool to help check ASF
>>> policies. To me, that's a big scope and an important
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <
> chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>
>> I feel kind of the opposite -- RAT is an important tool that's required of
>> all the Incubator projects, but pretty widely integra
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2010-08-12, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>
...but anyway - let's give it another go?
>
>>> Do you feel this requires another go? So far my vote count is 3 +1s and
>>> and one -1 which means it is one its way to pass.
>
>> Two voted -
On 2010-08-12, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> ...but I do think we should remove the dists from the maven repo and
> fix them to have the READMEs included. Not sure that makes it a full
> +1 or not :)
Looks as if Christian deems it important enough to re-roll, so let's
just do that.
Stefan
On 2010-08-12, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>> ...but anyway - let's give it another go?
>> Do you feel this requires another go? So far my vote count is 3 +1s and
>> and one -1 which means it is one its way to pass.
> Two voted -1: Sebastian + Torsten
I thought Torsten was just quoting sebb -
>> ...but anyway - let's give it another go?
>
> Do you feel this requires another go? So far my vote count is 3 +1s and
> and one -1 which means it is one its way to pass.
Two voted -1: Sebastian + Torsten
I think lets give another try - the problems are already solved and
the release process it
> COMPRESS-72
Yeah ... I remember that. I still don't think it's right. But whatever :)
>> ...but anyway - let's give it another go?
>
> Do you feel this requires another go? So far my vote count is 3 +1s and
> and one -1 which means it is one its way to pass.
I am +1 for the jar to be released
On 2010-08-12, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> Should be fixed in trunk.
thanks.
> That said: The README is not what I would expect.
> I would expect that content to be in the NOTICE.
COMPRESS-72
> ...but anyway - let's give it another go?
Do you feel this requires another go? So far my vote count is
>> [ ] +1 release it
>> [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
>> [X] -1 no, do not release it because
>
> version error in release-notes
> 2 files missing from archives.
Should be fixed in trunk.
That said: The README is not what I would expect.
I would expect that content to be in the NOTICE.
...but any
>> I feel kind of the opposite -- RAT is an important tool that's required of
>> all the Incubator projects, but pretty widely integrated (at least in Java
>> land) outside of the Incubator as a tool to help check ASF policies. To me,
>> that's a big scope and an important community, and just based
12 matches
Mail list logo
