On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Torsten Curdt wrote:
>
> For me that's exactly the other way around - most of the time I don't
> need the static access.
>
But, if you use static, you can access the log both ways.
>
> > (log objects aren't serializable for instance)
>
> How is that a problem?
>
> That can't be used most of the time
For me that's exactly the other way around - most of the time I don't
need the static access.
> (log objects aren't serializable for instance)
How is that a problem?
> and it's inefficient.
http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?PrematureOptimization
I plan to write an article about the changes in the new Lang version for
a German Magazine and would like to quote some statistics about the
usage of this library to stress its importance.
Can you point me somewhere where to find such figures? For instance, are
there statistics about downloads
That can't be used most of the time (log objects aren't serializable
for instance) and it's inefficient.
2010/8/7 Torsten Curdt :
> private Log log = LogFactory.getLog(this.getClass());
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/commons/Logging/StaticLog
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 18:36, Ted Dunning wrote:
>
private Log log = LogFactory.getLog(this.getClass());
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/Logging/StaticLog
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 18:36, Ted Dunning wrote:
> This really would be nice to have.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 6, 2010, at 8:36 PM, "cmaj135" wrote:
>
>> nod
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> cmaj13
This really would be nice to have.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 6, 2010, at 8:36 PM, "cmaj135" wrote:
nod
cmaj135
2010-08-07
发件人： Doug Bateman
发送时间： 2010-08-07 10:11:35
收件人： Commons Developers List
抄送：
主题： LogFactory.getLog()
Dear Commons Developers,
Here's a suggestion for the commons
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community
integrat
No worries. Should have run the test myself
On Aug 7, 2010 8:36 AM, "Jörg Schaible" wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> James Carman wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Jörg Schaible
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Can you please revert this? They are failing now. The provided generic
>>> type was exactly the rea
Hi James,
James Carman wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Jörg Schaible
> wrote:
>>
>> Can you please revert this? They are failing now. The provided generic
>> type was exactly the reason for the test!
>>
>
> My IDE (IntelliJ IDEA) gave me a "warning" that said "Explicit type
> arguments
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>
> Can you please revert this? They are failing now. The provided generic type
> was exactly the reason for the test!
>
My IDE (IntelliJ IDEA) gave me a "warning" that said "Explicit type
arguments can be inferred" for those two changes. I've
Hi James,
jcarman-1odqgaof3lkdnm+yrof...@public.gmane.org wrote:
> Author: jcarman
> Date: Fri Aug 6 22:58:03 2010
> New Revision: 983141
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=983141&view=rev
> Log:
> Removing some unnecessary boxing/casting/generics params
>
> Modified:
>
commons/pro
> >There may be some cases where it makes sense to propagate NPEs
> >directly. I don't see any in the code now, but I would not rule it
> >out for the future. I am fine, however, dispensing with
> >MathRuntimeException.createNullPointerException (that's what I meant
> >by "wrapped NPE." Technical
But hey, this also will stage build artifacts to the staging repos we
had before -
I thought we would like to avoid this with Nexus. Therefore we cannot
use mvn release:prepare, except we want to keep the whole old
procedure except the last step.
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Christian Grobmeier
> I am a bit puzzled about the new "create SVN tag" section. Isn't this
> exactly what "mvn release:prepare" does?
Yes you are right... I used the "manual way" here described in some
other commons-documents. I will change it with the parts of the
M2-Procedure http://wiki.apache.org/commons/Creatin
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-lang3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
16 matches
Mail list logo
