--
From: "Mladen Turk"
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 4:13 AM
To: "Commons Developers List"
Subject: [VOTE] Release Daemon 1.0.3 based on RC3
Hi,
I'm back :)
Almost six months after 1.0.3.RC2 attempt, but been
busy with other stuff.
I really can
Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 07/31/2010 05:10 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> # As a special exception to the GNU General Public License, if you
>> # distribute this file as part of a program that contains a
>> # configuration script generated by Autoconf, you may include it under
>> # the same distribution t
+1.
On OS X, both native/unix and Java built without error from source.
Sigs etc fine.
Hen
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 4:13 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm back :)
> Almost six months after 1.0.3.RC2 attempt, but been
> busy with other stuff.
>
> I really can't even remember what was the reaso
On 07/31/2010 05:10 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
# As a special exception to the GNU General Public License, if you
# distribute this file as part of a program that contains a
# configuration script generated by Autoconf, you may include it under
# the same distribution terms that you use for the rest
Le 31/07/2010 01:19, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
>
> Are there a definite coding style guidelines that justifies all those
> changes?
Yes, it is the checkstyle.xml file.
> I give below my preferences when they don't match yours.
>
>> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ public interface BivariateRealFunction {
>>
ok thanks, please don't forget me :P ;)
have anice conference,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Simone Tripodi
> wrote:
>> Hi all guys,
>> any news on this?
>
>
> No
Correct.
Jake
On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 11:49 -0400, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Jacob Beard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I answered your question on Stack Overflow.
> >
>
>
> Wrong thread?
>
> -Rahul
>
>
> > Jake
> >
> > On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 12:37 -0400, Rahul Akolkar w
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> any news on this?
None from me, plus I am at a conference next week. It is still on my
list, however!
-Rahul
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 3:
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Jacob Beard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I answered your question on Stack Overflow.
>
Wrong thread?
-Rahul
> Jake
>
> On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 12:37 -0400, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Jacob Beard wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I've discovered a f
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Jacob Beard wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 15:57 +0800, Xun Long Gui wrote:
>
>
>> >
>> > 3) There seems to be no way to have executable content on a transition. Is
>> > this under development?
>> >
>> I do not find any executable content on a transition in W3C's
Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm back :)
Great!
> Almost six months after 1.0.3.RC2 attempt, but been
> busy with other stuff.
>
> I really can't even remember what was the reason
> why the RC2 failed to get released.
>
> Anyhow RC3 release is available for testing at:
> http://people.apache.o
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=377924&projectId=2634
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Fri 30 Jul 2010 19:01:53 -0700
Finished at: Fri 30 Jul 2010 19:06:42 -0700
Total time: 4m 48s
Build Trigger: Schedule
B
Hi,
I answered your question on Stack Overflow.
Jake
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 12:37 -0400, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Jacob Beard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've discovered a few other potential issues with the external
> > communications module of the SCXML specificati
Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Are there a definite coding style guidelines that justifies all those
> changes?
Yes. Like most Commons components, [math] uses CheckStyle to
specify and enforce coding style guidelines. The file including the
checks is "checkstyle.xml" in the top-level svn directory. W
On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 15:57 +0800, Xun Long Gui wrote:
> >
> > 3) There seems to be no way to have executable content on a transition. Is
> > this under development?
> >
> I do not find any executable content on a transition in W3C's SCXML
> specification recommendtaion, so i am not clear what y
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=377858&projectId=2634
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Fri 30 Jul 2010 13:17:20 -0700
Finished at: Fri 30 Jul 2010 13:19:14 -0700
Total time: 1m 53s
Build Trigger: Schedule
B
Hi Chris,
Thank you for your feedback, see commends below:
在 2010年7月30日 上午4:28，Christopher Dragert 写道：
> I've gone through some of the basic functionality of the plug-in and
> generally found it to be good. I have several points of feedback:
>
> 1) A small feature request: Can you display the e
17 matches
Mail list logo
