Re: [cli] Heading to 1.3

2010-07-17 Thread Henri Yandell
+1. Sounds good. Hen On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 3:46 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Hi all, > > CLI is almost ready for a release. The latest issues have been resolved. The > documentation still needs some work to better explain the subtleties of the > command line parsing. I would really welcome some

Re: VOTE: Release commons-fileupload 1.2.2

2010-07-17 Thread Henri Yandell
+1. Agreed with all the non-blocking bits others pointed out. I compared to 1.2.1 and none are a regression. Hen On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 3:33 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to ask for a release of commons-fileupload 1.2.2. The > proposed source and binary distributions as well as

Re: [all] ApacheCon North America 2010

2010-07-17 Thread Ralph Goers
I can probably fill anywhere from 30 mins to the full hour. It would be nice for Oliver, Mario and Emmanuel to be there but I guess they all are on a different continent. It would be nice to finally meet them. For that matter, anyone who wants to get involved with Commons should go to Atlan

Re: VOTE: Release commons-fileupload 1.2.2

2010-07-17 Thread sebb
On 15 July 2010 11:33, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to ask for a release of commons-fileupload 1.2.2. The > proposed source and binary distributions as well as the KEYS file are > here: > >   http://people.apache.org/~jochen/fileupload > > The proposed site is here: > >   http://peopl

Re: [all] ApacheCon North America 2010

2010-07-17 Thread Phil Steitz
Ralph Goers wrote: > If you want another talk I could put something together to talk about VFS and > Configuration and how we are using it for multi-tenant configuration. > Great! How much time would you like? In any case, can you provide a short blurb for the web site? Thanks! Phil > Ralph >

Re: [all] ApacheCon North America 2010

2010-07-17 Thread Ralph Goers
If you want another talk I could put something together to talk about VFS and Configuration and how we are using it for multi-tenant configuration. Ralph On Jul 17, 2010, at 11:37 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > Phil Steitz wrote: >> Phil Steitz wrote: >>> We are in luck! Our friends in ComCom are cr

Re: [all] ApacheCon North America 2010

2010-07-17 Thread Phil Steitz
Phil Steitz wrote: > Phil Steitz wrote: >> We are in luck! Our friends in ComCom are creating a "tracklet" for >> us. We have three hours to work with, which we can cut up as we >> wish. So who wants to volunteer to speak? >> >> As I said above, I will volunteer for [math] and/or [dbcp]/[pool] >

Re: [chain]

2010-07-17 Thread Phil Steitz
Santiago Basulto wrote: > Hello everybody. > > First of all, let me apologize if i'm doing something wrong. I've been > reading the Contributors Guide and the Volunteering note > (http://commons.apache.org/volunteering.html) wrote by Mr. Craig, then > i decided to use this way. Welcome to Commons

Re: VOTE: Release commons-fileupload 1.2.2

2010-07-17 Thread Phil Steitz
Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to ask for a release of commons-fileupload 1.2.2. The > proposed source and binary distributions as well as the KEYS file are > here: > >http://people.apache.org/~jochen/fileupload > > The proposed site is here: > >http://people.apache.org/~joch

Re: [proxy] Changing the API to an interface (AGAIN)...

2010-07-17 Thread Matt Benson
On Jul 17, 2010, at 8:07 AM, James Carman wrote: I've toyed (pardon the pun) with the idea of being more builderish with proxy, but not necessarily with the main API. +1. I had a deeper look at how ProxyToys does its ToyFactories and I like the fact that [proxy] has a lower-level API; th

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2010-07-17 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community integrat

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme (in module commons-jelly) failed

2010-07-17 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community integration

Re: [proxy] Changing the API to an interface (AGAIN)...

2010-07-17 Thread James Carman
I've toyed (pardon the pun) with the idea of being more builderish with proxy, but not necessarily with the main API. I have ideas for introducing some of the proxying "patterns" (dare I say, they might ask me to write a book) from HiveMind, such as pipeline and whatever the other one was that pic

Re: [proxy] Changing the API to an interface (AGAIN)...

2010-07-17 Thread Jörg Schaible
Matt Benson wrote: > > On Jul 16, 2010, at 5:40 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > >> James Carman wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Matt Benson >>> wrote: But you can agree that making the first class a separate argument preserves the usability of varargs while accomplish