On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 12:00 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
> Not sure why one of our own never mentioned the existence of ProxyToys, but
> go figure. ;) I hate to exhibit NIH, but since I jumped into [proxy]
> partly to find a home for my fluent stubbed proxy code, I guess I'll
> persevere here.
>
Pr
On Jul 16, 2010, at 5:40 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
James Carman wrote:
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Matt Benson
wrote:
But you can agree that making the first class a separate argument
preserves the usability of varargs while accomplishing the typed
result
in a single method?
Mos
Commons Parent POM version 17 has been released.
This fixes some problems in version 16.
Changes since v16 are:
COMMONSSITE-60 - Profile "rc" lost ability to release to
/www/people.apache.org/builds/commons; "ci" dropped unnecessarily
NOTE: this means that the changes since v15 are:
- dropped "tr
We could perhaps set ourselves up for success in many situations. I
like the idea of using ServiceLoader which is part of the JDK. All
that means is that we include a file called
META-INF/services/org.apache.commons.proxy.ProxyFactory and in it we
have the implementation class name. Very low imp
Hello everybody.
First of all, let me apologize if i'm doing something wrong. I've been
reading the Contributors Guide and the Volunteering note
(http://commons.apache.org/volunteering.html) wrote by Mr. Craig, then
i decided to use this way.
My name is Santiago Basulto, i'm from Argentina. I've
On Jul 16, 2010, at 5:02 PM, James Carman wrote:
> One of the other major requests I've had from folks is the
> "auto-discovery" mechanism. So, basically they just call one static
> method somewhere to obtain a ProxyFactory and based on what's on the
> classpath, we determine what they're talkin
On Jul 16, 2010, at 5:40 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> James Carman wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>>>
>>> But you can agree that making the first class a separate argument
>>> preserves the usability of varargs while accomplishing the typed result
>>> in a single
On Jul 16, 2010, at 4:58 PM, James Carman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>> Consider it done, then. :)
>>
>> Poor birds.
>>
>
> Sorry, my wife has that "angry birds" application on her ipod touch,
> so I've been on a bird killing spree for the past few weeks.
>
James Carman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>>
>> But you can agree that making the first class a separate argument
>> preserves the usability of varargs while accomplishing the typed result
>> in a single method?
>>
>
> Most definitely! I like that idea. I would
Thank you for the tip. It was in my spam as well.
Jake
On 10-07-16 06:25 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
Notification emails have now been sent out by Google, subject starting
with "Midterm Evaluations results processed for ...". Check your Spam
folders for false positives, thats where these showed up
Notification emails have now been sent out by Google, subject starting
with "Midterm Evaluations results processed for ...". Check your Spam
folders for false positives, thats where these showed up for me.
-Rahul
-
To unsubscribe
One of the other major requests I've had from folks is the
"auto-discovery" mechanism. So, basically they just call one static
method somewhere to obtain a ProxyFactory and based on what's on the
classpath, we determine what they're talking about. Perhaps we can
just add that into ProxyUtils? We
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> Consider it done, then. :)
>
> Poor birds.
>
Sorry, my wife has that "angry birds" application on her ipod touch,
so I've been on a bird killing spree for the past few weeks.
--
On Jul 16, 2010, at 4:43 PM, James Carman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>>
>> But you can agree that making the first class a separate argument preserves
>> the usability of varargs while accomplishing the typed result in a single
>> method?
>>
>
> Most defini
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> But you can agree that making the first class a separate argument preserves
> the usability of varargs while accomplishing the typed result in a single
> method?
>
Most definitely! I like that idea. I would think that would be the
best w
On Jul 16, 2010, at 3:56 PM, James Carman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>> * WRT modules, what do you intend for the code remaining in the parent
>> project? I thought we might have a module each where we provide specialized
>> implementations of Invoker|Interce
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> * WRT modules, what do you intend for the code remaining in the parent
> project? I thought we might have a module each where we provide specialized
> implementations of Invoker|Interceptor|ObjectProvider...
>
The code is just sitting there
On Jul 14, 2010, at 9:21 PM, James Carman wrote:
> All,
>
> One of the biggest complaints I've received from folks about the proxy
> library is that it's not based on interfaces. The main class is the
> ProxyFactory class and it's a concrete class which implements all
> proxying logic using JDK
2010/7/16 Xun Long Gui :
> Yeah, I will improve my commit message in the future
> BTW, i have closed JIRA issue SCXML-153
>
OK, I've edited the log message for the SVN rev to include the JIRA issue.
-Rahul
> 2010/7/16 Rahul Akolkar
>
>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:02 PM, wrote:
>> > Author:
Hi,
I will do that brother. I will surely help you in this.
Regards,
jd
2010/7/16 Xun Long Gui
> Hi Jitesh,
> My project is going well, this is my project web site:
> http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/gsoc/2010/scxml-eclipse/
>
> Thank you for your interest, you can learn more my project info
Hi all,
CLI is almost ready for a release. The latest issues have been resolved.
The documentation still needs some work to better explain the subtleties
of the command line parsing. I would really welcome some help on this part.
I'd like to push a beta before the final release to get some fe
Yeah, I will improve my commit message in the future
BTW, i have closed JIRA issue SCXML-153
2010/7/16 Rahul Akolkar
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:02 PM, wrote:
> > Author: guixl
> > Date: Fri Jul 16 03:02:10 2010
> > New Revision: 964665
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=964665&vie
Hi Jitesh,
My project is going well, this is my project web site:
http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/gsoc/2010/scxml-eclipse/
Thank you for your interest, you can learn more my project info here
2010/7/16 jitesh dundas
> Hello Xun Long,
>
> Just wanted to catch up on things and ask how were you
23 matches
Mail list logo
