[scxml-eclipse] Correlating commits and JIRA issues (was: svn commit: r964665)

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:02 PM, wrote: > Author: guixl > Date: Fri Jul 16 03:02:10 2010 > New Revision: 964665 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=964665&view=rev > Log: > add prefix "*.scxml" for document import file selection dialog > In cases where commits can be matched to JIRA issu

[VOTE][RESULT] Release Commons Parent POM version 17

The results of the vote were as follows: Rahul Akolkar +1 (*) Luc Maisonobe +1 (*) Sebastian Bazley +1 (*) Henri Biestro +1 (*) Jörg Schaible +1 (*) With 5 +1 votes (all binding) the vote passes. Thanks to all who voted (again!). S/// On 13 July 2010 10:19, sebb wrote: > On 13 July 2010 07:05

Re: VOTE: Release commons-fileupload 1.2.2

Maven and ant builds work fine for me (tested with Java 1.4 and 1.5 on Windows 7). Artifacts look good, but I have the following nits: - There is no RELEASE-NOTES.txt with the current release notes. - There are no jars with the Javadocs and sources. - There are some checkstyle errors. I think mo

Re: [GSoC] Mid-term evaluations next week

On 10-07-15 01:04 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: Ofcourse, if you feel there is anything else you'd like share from a mid-term survey PoV, please do so today (nothing is required at this point). I think the updates on my blog have been fairly complete, so I'd like to leave it at that. Occas

Re: [GSoC] Mid-term evaluations next week

2010/7/15 Jacob Beard : > Hi Rahul, > > Unfortunately, I had configured my email filters to automatically > archive all Apache Commons traffic that was not in [scxml], > [scxml-js], or [all], and so I missed this email which used the [gsoc] > tag. I just now found it while searching through my arch

Re: [GSoC] Mid-term evaluations next week

Hi Rahul, Unfortunately, I had configured my email filters to automatically archive all Apache Commons traffic that was not in [scxml], [scxml-js], or [all], and so I missed this email which used the [gsoc] tag. I just now found it while searching through my archives. This was a mistake, and I hop

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community integrat

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community integration

Re: [proxy] 2.0 WAS Re: a bit of commons-style code in search of a home

Hi James, James Carman wrote: > Well, the proxy code needs a bit of work. First, I'd say, I need to > rollback the serializability requirement for all generated proxies. Huh? At least JDK and CGLIB generated proxies are always serializable, you have no choice. - Jörg ---

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-net (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-net has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

VOTE: Release commons-fileupload 1.2.2

Hi, I'd like to ask for a release of commons-fileupload 1.2.2. The proposed source and binary distributions as well as the KEYS file are here: http://people.apache.org/~jochen/fileupload The proposed site is here: http://people.apache.org/~jochen/fileupload/site The list of changes: